Climate continues to change.

[Richard_P_Feynman]

You keep saying that about anyone who you have engaged in this thread. Yet, you continue to engage people in the thread and you continue not to have anything at all to illustrate why they are "wrong."

You say that while assiduously ignoring the links and information that's put in front of your face. Now, tell me how the climate scientists have got their account of radiative forcing wrong.

 

[Que]

You say that while assiduously ignoring the links and information that's put in front of your face. Now, tell me how the climate scientists have got their account of radiative forcing wrong.

I must have missed the "links and information" that you (as Dick Fagman) have "put in front" of me.

Link?

 

[Que]

RDS never was able to put any of these concepts into his own words either but at least he had his handy climate change cheatsheet to refudiate various points. Why don't you contact him and see if you can borrow it?

Interesting that you felt the need to edit out the above. Have you asked RDS if you can borrow his cheatsheet?

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

I must have missed the "links and information" that you (as Dick Fagman) have "put in front" of me.

Link?

Apparently you did miss them. Why don't you read back over the climate threads and the blurt thread, and report back when you found them.

Interesting that you felt the need to edit out the above. Have you asked RDS if you can borrow his cheatsheet?

Because that particular snipe was irrelevant.

 

[Que]

Apparently you did miss them. Why don't you read back over the climate threads and the blurt thread, and report back when you found them.



Because that particular snipe was irrelevant.

So no links of "links and information" provided by you as Dick Fagman then?

How is pointing you to RDS for his tattered cheatcheat a "snipe?" I mean, granted, RDS might be offended that I point out his hackneyed use of that tired "refudiation" list, but why would you feel impugned, Dick?

 

[Hypoxia]

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/climate-change-models-fail-to-accurately-simulate-droughts/

From the right-wing, petro-funded, non-scientists at Scientific American. Just one small part of "Climate Models Continue to Fail."

Right up front: "That does not mean there are no correct predictions, but it does mean that surprises are more common than we think and that many phenomena are impossible to model within a very precise window of accuracy. "

When a model isn't accurate enough, learn, and rebuild the model. That's what science does: builds ever-closer models, none perfect, but heading towards a closer approximation of reality. If you think your model is perfect, you've done something terribly wrong.

 

[Luk]

I'm such an effective stalker that in the what are you reading thread I posted Feynman's biography long before "Skiddles" chose that particular name for for this one of his incarnations.

Feynman is one of the most often quoted scientists of the modern era, because of his fantastic sense of humor and keen insights. Something the both of you lack.

320,000 Google results for "Feynman Climate." That's a lot of gin joints.

"Feynman Quotes" returns almost one million results.

"Feynman Science" has 660,000.

Lol @ Q-Bert talking about Rob being Skiddles in the same post as "keen observation". What a fuckin dope.

 

[Que]

Lol @ Q-Bert talking about Rob being Skiddles in the same post as "keen observation". What a fuckin dope.

Wait, wut?

So you are saying that Dick Fagman is Rob?

Huh.

Are you sure?

Rob insists that he has never used an alt. "No, not once. Honest!"

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

Wait, wut?

So you are saying that Dick Fagman is Rob?

Huh.

Are you sure?

Rob insists that he has never used an alt. "No, not once. Honest!"

Thanks for the larf, doofus.

 

[KUJACK]

A butterfly flaps its wings in China

How does this affected the weather in Maryland?

Not much by maybe a little.

When we can predict the weather 50 years from now, , then I will believe in man made climate change, maybe..

 

[Hypoxia]

How does this affected the weather in Maryland?

Not much by maybe a little.

When we can predict the weather 50 years from now, , then I will believe in man made climate change, maybe..

How long can you tread water?

 

[Que]

Thanks for the larf, doofus.

Luke thinks you are Rob. Is that true, or is Luke too high to comprehend what he read?

 

[Luk]

Luke thinks you are Rob. Is that true, or is Luke too high to comprehend what he read?

Thanks for the larf, doofus.

 

[Que]

Thanks for the larf, doofus.

What made you suggest that Fagman is (exclusively) Rob?

 

[Luk]

What made you suggest that Fagman is (exclusively) Rob?

Do you really want to keep betting on that dead horse? Do you really think that I think Rob is Dick?

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

What made you suggest that Fagman is (exclusively) Rob?

You must really enjoy digging yourself holes. You do it at least as well as vetteman.

 

[Luk]

You must really enjoy digging yourself holes. You do it at least as well as vetteman.

If either one of them committed Liticide again, I'd be a little sad.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

If either one of them committed Liticide again, I'd be a little sad.

Ever since Que talked about reading Rob's divorce papers, I've had a hard time seeing him as any better than lace. But it is fun to see him stumble around his own feet.

 

[Luk]

Ever since Que talked about reading Rob's divorce papers, I've had a hard time seeing him as any better than lace. But it is fun to see him stumble around his own feet.

That's disgusting.

 

[Que]

I'm not sure why the two of you are so obsessed with Rob. He has so infrequently stopped by lately. He is probably busy.

 

[phrodeau]

How does this affected the weather in Maryland?

Not much by maybe a little.

When we can predict the weather 50 years from now, , then I will believe in man made climate change, maybe..

A butterfly, not so much. But Hurricane Harvey sure did reduce smog levels in Houston. Temporarily, anyway.

 

[thør]

There's more snow!

 

[Hypoxia]

There's more snow!

global warming --> energized hydrosphere --> extreme weather --> more snow and floods etc

 

[trysail]

global warming --> energized hydrosphere --> extreme weather --> more snow and floods etc

There's just a slight, teeny, weeny problem with your speculative assertion:

no evidence​

There is no evidence, whatsoever, of any change in the variation and intensity of weather systems including drought, rain storms or hurricanes. You've been manipulated into believing the untrue. The charlatans have played you like a chump.

An Energetic Perspective on United States Tropical Cyclone Landfall Droughts
Authors Ryan E. Truchelut, Erica M. Staehling

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017GL076071/full

Abstract
The extremely active 2017 Atlantic hurricane season concluded an extended period of quiescent continental United States tropical cyclone landfall activity that began in 2006, commonly referred to as the landfall drought. We introduce an extended climatology of U.S. tropical cyclone activity based on accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) and use this data set to investigate variability and trends in landfall activity. The drought years between 2006 and 2016 recorded an average value of total annual ACE over the U.S. that was less than 60% of the 1900–2017 average. Scaling this landfall activity metric by basin-wide activity reveals a statistically significant downward trend since 1950, with the percentage of total Atlantic ACE expended over the continental U.S. at a series minimum during the recent drought period...
​

​

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

WTF does landfall activity have to do with how energetic the Atlantic basin is?