Clarence The Crosseyed (In)Justice

jaF0

Moderator
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Posts
39,168
Seems to be a lot of chatter about the Gin wife being in contact with people she shouldn't have been and maybe that the old Goat hissef was involved in planning the Insurrection.

Should he be de-seated?

Has that ever happened before?
 
Best Justice we've had on the Court for decades. I'd take eight more of him in a heartbeat.
Seems to me jaF0 has a serious problem with black people in positions of power.

White supremacist same as ever.....
 
Excuse me, but we're talking about the political hack combo of Long Dong Silver and wife.

Long live Anita Hill, who still stands tall and proud above the political hacks.
 
Last edited:
Excuse me, but we're talking about the political hack combo of Long John Silver and wife.

Long live Anita Hill, who still stands tall and proud above the political hacks.
Otherwise known as Christine Blasey Ford in blackface. A liar whose lies weren't believed by any sane person.
 
Not a good example. Ford was believed by all sane people.
As a matter of faith only. There was no evidence anything she said had ever happened. Dhe could barely tell us what decade this all supposedly happened.
 
Yes, the spotlights should continue to be beamed on Clarence Thomas and wife until even they are embarrassed about themselves--and he retires. He's been a drone on the bench anyway other than to provide a Neanderthal vote for decades and to function as the sexual assaulter rep on the bench until Kavanaugh came along to take up that role.
 
Yes, the spotlights should continue to be beamed on Clarence Thomas and wife until even they are embarrassed about themselves--and he retires. He's been a drone on the bench anyway other than to provide a Neanderthal vote for decades and to function as the sexual assaulter rep on the bench until Kavanaugh came along to take up that role.
He's clearly a thought leader on the Court, a stoic Originalist as every Justice ought to be.
 
As a matter of faith only. There was no evidence anything she said had ever happened. Dhe could barely tell us what decade this all supposedly happened.
According to the sources you read, anyway.
 
True. Not even the WaPo or NYT could come up with a single corroborating person or piece of evidence. There's no evidence that the party Ford talked about even took place.
That simply isn't true, which gets back to my earlier point. You use sources that tell people like you what you want to hear, with disregard for the truth. I'm not a huge fan of the Post or the Times either; but yes, it has been corroborated that the party happened and that the accusations about Justice Beer's behavior pass the smell test among those who knew him at the time.
 
He's clearly a thought leader on the Court, a stoic Originalist as every Justice ought to be.
One vexing problem with a republic with Protestant Christianity in its founding DNA is that too many people tend to approach the Constitution like Bible scholars.
 
Not a good example. Ford was believed by all sane people.
She couldn’t remember when the alleged incident took place, where it took place, or who was there. Even her friend she was counting on said she had no recollection. That said, apparently some of her ā€œbeach friendsā€ believed her. šŸ˜‚
 
She couldn’t remember when the alleged incident took place, where it took place, or who was there. Even her friend she was counting on said she had no recollection. That said, apparently some of her ā€œbeach friendsā€ believed her. šŸ˜‚
Not true. Don't believe everything the Gateway Pundit or Newsmax tells you.
 
Not true. Don't believe everything the Gateway Pundit or Newsmax tells you.
I watched the hearings. The ones she initially resisted claiming she was afraid of travel, and ultimately showed up for after getting a lawyer. šŸ˜‚
 
Otherwise known as Christine Blasey Ford in blackface. A liar whose lies weren't believed by any sane person.
^^^A white Deplorable calling Professor Hill a white person in blackface? Can't get any more racist than that. Congratulations.

And, you just outdid Thomas (aka Long Dong Silver), who was equally insulting when he accused Hill of leaving pubic hairs on his can of Coca-Cola.

Anita Hill stands tall and proud above Clarence Thomas and his Deplorable supporters. She paved the way for the new nominee to the Supreme Court.
 
That simply isn't true, which gets back to my earlier point. You use sources that tell people like you what you want to hear, with disregard for the truth. I'm not a huge fan of the Post or the Times either; but yes, it has been corroborated that the party happened and that the accusations about Justice Beer's behavior pass the smell test among those who knew him at the time.
False. Every word.
 
^^^A white Deplorable calling Professor Hill a white person in blackface? Can't get any more racist than that. Congratulations.

And, you just outdid Thomas (aka Long Dong Silver), who was equally insulting when he accused Hill of leaving pubic hairs on his can of Coca-Cola.

Anita Hill stands tall and proud above Clarence Thomas and his Deplorable supporters. She paved the way for the new nominee to the Supreme Court.
Repeating the lie doesn't make it true.
 
Seems to be a lot of chatter about the Gin wife being in contact with people she shouldn't have been and maybe that the old Goat hissef was involved in planning the Insurrection.

Should he be de-seated?

Has that ever happened before?
Get serious. He is not going to be ā€de-seated.ā€
 
Back
Top