I've had all three (cut, uncut, and half cut) and I'm gonan have to go with it's not the size of the vessel or the shape of the vessel, it's the motion of the ocean.
I don't think any of them inhibit sexual play....
But i tend to think cut cocks look more attractive, but that is just my 2 cents!!!
it is circumsized with out having all the excess skin removed....so he has a tip but still has lots of lee way on the skin like a guy that is not cut. it's hard to explain, i had to see it to understand...LOL
Half-cut means halfway to getting seriously drunk from where I come from ! I was cicrumsized at birth - went from 10lbs 12 ounces down to 9lb 8 oz in seconds!!!
I am uncut, and I much prefer it that way: first, it's easier to masturbate, as the skin can be used as a form of lubricant, slipping back and forth over the head. Some women who have never been with a man with an uncut cock have found it amusing to play with the extra skin. Unless there are religious reasons, I see circumcision as unnecessary surgery. Washing an uncut cock is no more difficult than washing hands, and it is no more likely to smell than fingers on a hand.
The sight of an uncut cock isn't that bad. I mean, if the forsekin isn't too massive, it's fine. You have to know what to do with an uncut shaft. I didn't circumsize my son because quite frankly, it's an unnecessary procedure. And I agree with everything Sappholovers says.
I actually have to write a paper on this topic.
I'm uncut as you can tell in the Picture Thread..lol... but I never got any complaints. When I was in Europe, its the norm there and people look at cut differently. I only ran into one chick who at first didnt like it, but then changed her mind real quick lol.
Either way I dont think it should make that much of a difference..or does it?
I was uncut for several days after birth. The primary doctor was out of town when I was born and the guy who delivered me had no idea that my parents wanted me circumsized. Several days after I was born, I was tied down to a something resembling a cross and was snipped.
When erect or even with the skinned pulled back, an uncut cock looks very much like a cut cock. The appearance should make do difference. When aroused, the skin automatically pulls back, but a man who is uncut has the choice to pull back the skin any time he wants. Uncut gives you some alternatives: You can play a little hide and seek with the head, and more can be done with manual play. I love it when a woman caresses my balls lightly and gently slides my skin up and down the head, putting light pressure against the ridge. This motion can't be done with a cut cock. I always feel circumcision is just a conspiracy of uptight mothers to make it more difficult for the boys or young men to masturbate. ...and it's aided and abetted by doctors who profit from the operation. Stay natural. Be natural. Don't circumcise your kids....(unless compelled to because of religious faith).
Totally fascinated by the uncut cock. Have noticed that most European men tend to be uncut but seems to be rare here in the U.S. Have not noticed a difference sexually other than pre erection and during oral initially.