Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's kinda silly to either idolize or demonize particular individuals for historical currents which are beyond their control.
Columbus was an outstanding sailor and he deserves credit for his navigational accomplishments.
He was a less than accomplished governor.
To claim he "discovered" the Americas is inaccurate. Clearly, there were earlier explorers and even colonies (AKA the Vikings).
There is even some debate about whether the Chinese Admiral Zheng He may have sailed and mapped part of the eastern seaboard in the early 15th century, though that is mostly speculation with little credible confirming evidence.
To lay the blame of Spanish and Portuguese colonization at Columbus's feet, or the devastation of the indigenous populations from subsequent diseases, or the polices of Ecomienda and the Latifundia system is ridiculous.
Millennia of isolation from the Eurasia/Africa landmass meant that any sort of prolonged contact, before the advent of modern medicine, was going to expose indigenous populations to massive epidemics with extremely high mortality rates.
Centuries of the Spanish Reconquista formed the institutions of the Encomienda and the Latifundia system.
And it also has to be said that not only were the indigenous societies still at stone-age or bronze age levels of material technology, but also at stone-age and bronze age levels of social technology.
There was just no way sustained contact was going to end well for the indigenous populations, no matter which civilization made that contact.
It's stupid, you don't even get the day off, but the bank is closed and the mail doesn't come.
The man was one helluva sailor.
He was going to the East Indies, though...
The man was one helluva sailor.
Is it fair to hold historical figures to modern standards? Apart from self loathing, what's the difference?
Is it fair to hold historical figures to modern standards?
Apart from self loathing, what's the difference?
I think it's ridiculous to compare Columbus to Hitler.
But that's just my opinion.
you're a fart smeller bro.
Stew
I venture to point out that both the English and the Indians spring from a common stock, called the Indo-Aryan. … A general belief seems to prevail in the Colony [of India in Africa] that the Indians are little better, if at all, than savages or the Natives of Africa. Even the children are taught to believe in that manner, with the result that the Indian is being dragged down to the position of a raw Kaffir.
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, open letter to the Natal Parliament, 1893
I have no doubt about the soundness of my advice. However much one may sympathise with the Bantus, Indians cannot make common cause with them.
- Gandhi, 1939
Poor widdle self-enslaved despicables of perpetual victimhood better start cleansing themselves of their own numerous exaltations for heroes they've previously and proudly held-up as champions anti-minority oppression:
Forty-six years later, one of history's most proclaimed humanitarian champions of the oppressed fully backed-up his "racist" slant:
See, Gandhi intrinsically believed blacks were inferior and yet even black racist pieces of shit here on the GB have held him up as their champion, viewing themselves as common, oppressed victims, first.
Here's a big newsflash, folks: human beings - IN GENERAL - are savages. Every skin pigmentation under the sun has outright murdered, oppressed and enslaved other skin pigmentations since the dawn of time. Blacks in Africa and America most certainly can be total savages, just as whites or reds in America, or whites in Europe, or yellows in Asia, or browns in the mideast most definitely can be and are, too; thus, what all the whine is really about is who is the recognized king of the savage hill at any specific time - everyone else is then moaned-over as being oppressed, simply because their own savagery wasn't as effective at that time.
Boo-fucking-hoo - get back to me when your time to be the oppressor again comes around.
BTW, all you pposs, regardless of whatever skin pigmentation you show or your essential need to claim perpetual victimhood just so it's so much easier for you to ignore your own, natural savagery:
If you champion the intentional and torturous killing of completely innocent and totally defenseless human life simply for convenience, you cannot be in any other way oppressed or a victim...
...all you simply are is a fucking savage babykiller.
you're a fart smeller bro.
Stew
http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article6125095.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/underwear.jpg
Don't disparage the joy of alternative sexualities, that's an actual fetish, bro!
Zoom