morninggirl5
Secret Dream Machine
- Joined
- May 6, 2001
- Posts
- 10,647
Bush asked Congress for $25 million a year — three times current Spending — to pay for character education. The House and Senate, confident the program will be popular at home, recently upped the funding to $50 million a year. Before we rejoice in the new teaching of virtue, however, we need to confront two problems, one philosophical, the other practical. First, the underlying idea behind the rest of Bush's education package is to give states more flexibility in return for holding them more accountable for performance. That's why Bush wants to streamline federal programs — so he can demand results without telling states and schools exactly what to do. But the character education grants do just the opposite. To get the cash, school districts will be required to teach several specific government-approved values: caring, civic virtue and citizenship, justice and fairness, respect, responsibility and trustworthiness. (Districts are free to add their own).
http://www.time.com/time/columnist/goldstein/article/0,9565,166566,00.html
So how do you feel about this part of the education bill? Should teachers spend 30 minutes everyday teaching "values" that may or may not reflect the values of their homes?
The State of Georgia already has mandatory character education, and like the DARE programs, research has shown NO positive effects. I, personally, have argued against character education every time it has come up for discussion, only to be blasted by teachers who say "if they don't learn it at school, they won't learn it at all." How do parents feel about this?