Cellphone Jammers

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
The use of a cellphone jammer is illegal, immoral, but probably not fattening. However, why do I find myself so tempted? Comments?

SHUT THE CELL UP

February 20, 2005 -- Can you hear me now?
Unsuspecting cellphone users may find themselves saying that more often now that cellphone jammers — illegal gizmos that interfere with signals and cut off reception — are selling like hotcakes on the streets of New York.

"I bought one online, and I love it," said one jammer owner fed up with the din of dumb conversations and rock-and-roll ringtones.

"I use it on the bus all the time. I always zap the idiots who discuss what they want from the Chinese restaurant so that everyone can hear them. Why is that necessary?"

He added, "I can't throw the phones out the window, so this is the next best thing."

Online jammer seller Victor McCormack said he's made "hundreds of sales" to New Yorkers.

"The interest has gone insane in the last few years. I get all sorts of people buying them, from priests to police officers."

Jammers come in a variety of shapes and sizes, from portable handhelds that look like cellphones to larger, fixed models as big as suitcases.

Their sole goal is to zip inconsiderate lips. The smaller gadgets emit radio frequencies that block signals anywhere from a 50- to 200-foot radius. They range in price from $250 to $2,000.

But don't expect to find jammers at the local Radio Shack — they're against Federal Communications Commission regulations because they interfere with emergency calls and the public airwaves. They are illegal to buy, sell, use, import or advertise.

A violation means an $11,000 fine, but the FCC's Enforcement Bureau has yet to bust one person anywhere in the country.

"This is not a crime that they're going after," said Rob Bernstein, deputy editor at New York City-based Sync magazine.

He said jammers are here, and their use is multiplying.

"Right now, there's a growing curiosity about jammers in the United States and New York," Bernstein said. "There's no better way to shut up a loudmouth on the phone, so people definitely want them and are finding ways to get them."

One way is at a spy shop on Third Avenue, which sells medium-sized jammers out of a back room for $1,500. The sales clerk there said he had sold jammers to a 50-year-old man who bought one to use on the Long Island Rail Road, and to restaurateurs.

Folks who run auto auctions also buy them to stop people from chit-chatting about prices and rigging their bids, the clerk said.

An employee at a West Village spy store said the shop also sells jammers, but only to people from other countries.

One local purchaser bought a portable jammer last year, and said he likes using it at Roosevelt Field mall on Long Island.

"One time I followed this guy around for 20 minutes," he said. "I kept zapping him and zapping him, until finally he threw the phone on the floor. I couldn't stop laughing. It was so cool."

Jammers were first developed to help government security forces avert eavesdropping and thwart phone-triggered bombings. But by the late 1990s they were being sold to the public.

There are suspicions that some hotel chains employ jammers to cut down on guests' cellphone use and boost in-room phone charges.
 
i had no idea.
and i dont know why, but i find this insanely funny...
 
Cellphone jammers aren't exactly illegal. They're used everywhere: in churches, in India's parliament, in theatres in Tokyo...

The technology was developed by Israel to stop cellphone-triggered bombs like the ones used in Madrid on 11-Mar, but has many applications. Even some restaurants have them, around here.
 
On one hand, I regard these as infringement on freedom of speech and possibly dangerous if used to stop emergency calls.

On the other hand, I want one! Gimme, gimme, gimme.
 
rgraham666 said:
On one hand, I regard these as infringement on freedom of speech and possibly dangerous if used to stop emergency calls.

On the other hand, I want one! Gimme, gimme, gimme.

Of course, the blockage of emergency calls is the main reason why the FCC makes cellphone blockers illegal in the US. However, if you have to take public transportation, the idea of capital punishment for excessive cellphone use does not seem all that far out at the time.
 
rgraham666 said:
On one hand, I regard these as infringement on freedom of speech and possibly dangerous if used to stop emergency calls.

On the other hand, I want one! Gimme, gimme, gimme.
Ditto. On all counts. :D
 
Lauren Hynde said:
Cellphone jammers aren't exactly illegal. They're used everywhere: in churches, in India's parliament, in theatres in Tokyo...

The technology was developed by Israel to stop cellphone-triggered bombs like the ones used in Madrid on 11-Mar, but has many applications. Even some restaurants have them, around here.

I assume the article was published in the US, Lauren. There's plenty o' stuff that's legal elsewhere, but illegal here...;)

Edited to add: But we've got guns. So there. :rolleyes: ;)
 
Last edited:
minsue said:
I assume the article was published in the US, Lauren. There's plenty o' stuff that's legal elsewhere, but illegal here...;)

Edited to add: But we've got guns. So there. :rolleyes: ;)

I suppose we could just shoot the damned things out of their hands. That wouldn't be a crime would it? (Maybe they could fine you for littering.)

This brings up my common daydream of tossing a smoke grenade into the back seat of one of those wonderfull boombox cars running in our streets. Of course I would wait until they were stopped at a traffic light.

Cat
 
I don't know, the idea that people are jamming other people for fun seems kind of sad. And, I would be willing to bet that if someone jammed the jammers when they were using their cell phone, the jammers would be plenty pissed.
 
Wow.... I could only hope to have one of those! I'd have so many places to use it! There's so many people that talk on the phone out of sheer boredom, and don't notice how loud they're talking! About anything! :eek:
 
yui said:
I don't know, the idea that people are jamming other people for fun seems kind of sad. And, I would be willing to bet that if someone jammed the jammers when they were using their cell phone, the jammers would be plenty pissed.

Yui:
Unless you live/have lived in a large city and had to use public transportation, you have no idea of the problem. There may be 50 people in a train car and all of them are trying to conduct what might be charitably called a conmversation at the same time. The conversations typically consist of pretty much the same type of thing, "We are just paassing 59th street, what's for dinner? We are just passing 60th street, we sure having hamburger a lot." We are just passing 61st street . . ." I think you get the idea.

Anyone who is not talking on a cellphone is listening to the ring tone and preparing to talk on his/her cell phone. It is like travelling inside a bass drum.

I do not own and probably never will own a cell phone. That said, I did rent a celll phone for a coast to coast auto trip, just in case I broke down halfway between the towns of Cowflop and Wretched Mess.
 
R. Richard said:
Yui:
Unless you live/have lived in a large city and had to use public transportation, you have no idea of the problem. There may be 50 people in a train car and all of them are trying to conduct what might be charitably called a conmversation at the same time. The conversations typically consist of pretty much the same type of thing, "We are just paassing 59th street, what's for dinner? We are just passing 60th street, we sure having hamburger a lot." We are just passing 61st street . . ." I think you get the idea.

Anyone who is not talking on a cellphone is listening to the ring tone and preparing to talk on his/her cell phone. It is like travelling inside a bass drum.

I do not own and probably never will own a cell phone. That said, I did rent a celll phone for a coast to coast auto trip, just in case I broke down halfway between the towns of Cowflop and Wretched Mess.


Hi RR,

Thanks for your reply! I don't live in a city, so you are right, I don't have an idea of the problem. I live in a rather rural area and my cell is a great source of comfort. I have used it in public places, but like to think that I am a courteous person, so I don't walk around chatting at the top of my lungs. In fact, I am always vaguely embarrassed to receive a call in public and I end up having a hurried, whispered conversation or I leave and find a more private venue.

Ringtones do annoy me especially if someone it text messaging and it's going off every 12 seconds. Use vibrate! I would like to have a Nic Tse ringtone, though, but I can't get one with my carrier. ;)

I use my cell phone predominately in my car. I can do lots of busy phone work while I'm en route to wherever, but I certainly wouldn't do the same thing while in a train car full of strangers. I still think the jammers sound like they have the potential to allow really petty people to be vindictive, but I don't have ride in a train car with fifty people having fifty different, simultaneous, inane conversations, either, so...

Luck,

Yui
 
Last edited:
Jammers come in a variety of shapes and sizes, from portable handhelds that look like cellphones to larger, fixed models as big as suitcases.

I will wait until thay have ones that you can hang about your neck — say in the form of a crucifix, or a clove of garlic.


"Right now, there's a growing curiosity about jammers in the United States and New York," Bernstein said.

Just a quick question: Did New York secede from the Bush League?
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
Just a quick question: Did New York secede from the Bush League?

From what I understand VB, the U.S. has the same relationship to New York that Canada does to Toronto.

Hatred of those cities is one of the few unifying factors of the nation. And the cities regard themselves as unwilling hostages of the nation.

Doesn't make much sense to me, but then little of human behaviour does.
 
rgraham666 said:
From what I understand VB, the U.S. has the same relationship to New York that Canada does to Toronto.

Hatred of those cities is one of the few unifying factors of the nation. And the cities regard themselves as unwilling hostages of the nation.

Doesn't make much sense to me, but then little of human behaviour does.

I thought that was California? :D
 
R. Richard said:
The use of a cellphone jammer is illegal, immoral, but probably not fattening.

You're right it is (not sure about the non-fattening bit).

Just a comment. I thought that cell phones were bad for people with pacemakers so I can only imagine what a jammer would do :confused:

IMHO the "shut the cell up" game is quite dangerous. Hell ignoring the pacemaker case, we don't know what's the real effect of cellphones on the human body and we go on using jamming devices.

I feel like beating up the person that points such a thing at me more than the loudmouth.

DrF
 
DrFreud said:
I feel like beating up the person that points such a thing at me more than the loudmouth.

DrF

Typically a cellphone jammer is a non-directional cellphone frequency transmitter that transmits "white noise" or a sine wave type signal to overwhelm cellphone messages, either incoming or outgoing. It is not necessary to point such a device.
 
R. Richard said:
Typically a cellphone jammer is a non-directional cellphone frequency transmitter that transmits "white noise" or a sine wave type signal to overwhelm cellphone messages, either incoming or outgoing. It is not necessary to point such a device.

Great, so now I have to frisk people to find the bloody jammer?! :(
I'm off to Amish country....

DrF
 
I'd love to have one. provided it would work on the morons driving with their knee while yackin on their cell phone and drinking a coke.
 
Colleen Thomas said:
I'd love to have one. provided it would work on the morons driving with their knee while yackin on their cell phone and drinking a coke.

Nah, then they'd just be swerving all over the road trying to get better reception. :rolleyes:
 
Colleen Thomas said:
I'd love to have one. provided it would work on the morons driving with their knee while yackin on their cell phone and drinking a coke.

There is hope, Colly!
"In 2001, New York became the first state to prohibit any driver from using a hand-held cell phone while driving, except in emergencies. The maximum penalty for illegal cell phone use is $100. New York’s law took effect November 1. A recent study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety suggests that passage of the New York law has reduced the use of hand-held phones while driving. One month before New York’s law took effect, about 2.3% of all drivers were estimated to use hand-held cell phones. Several months after police began issuing citations, hand-held phone usage dropped about 50% to about 1.1% of all drivers."
 
Back
Top