Casual Spouse Sharing Among In-Laws

[RedHatter76]

This is another idea that I might put into a story of my own at some point, but in any case, I'd like to see what anyone else might do with it too.

The basic premise is fairly simple. A sexually liberated family has a tradition in which the sharing of sexual access to spouses is considered an expression of familial solidarity. Each spouse and the other spouse's siblings (and maybe even parents) are at least permitted if not gently encouraged to aid in satisfying each other's sexual needs.

The other key aspect is that nobody in this unusually close-knit family really cares about privacy among fellow members. They often treat sex almost as if it's just scratching an itch. They don't care if anyone else is in the room or not, and any incidental witnesses react with amusement at most.

For example, let's say we have a married couple of 24-year-olds who've taken in hubby's 19-year-old brother since they live near the university he attends. For double the fun, maybe wifey's similarly aged sister also lives with them for the same reason. Little bro wakes up with morning wood and groggily trudges into the kitchen, where sis-in-law is making breakfast. He casually pulls her pajama pants down and unloads himself into her pussy. She clearly enjoys it and may even climax herself. On the flip side, maybe little sis likes to drop her pants and ask hubby to fill her hole as a means of after-school relaxation.

Personally, I think it would be hottest if they usually do it from behind (e.g. doggy or prone-bone) and undress only to the extent needed for easy access. That would highlight the largely spontaneous and pragmatic nature of most encounters.

 

[CuteSlaveLisa]

There are societies, at least some Alaskan Esskimo groups come to mind, where life is tough, fragile and fleeting. Just as in biblical times in the middle eastern desert HOSPITALITY is a guiding societal feature.

Within these societies the 'gift' of one man's woman to another is what Jews refer to as a Mitzvah, which is like a super extra good deed. The Bible contains 613 of them. (To my knowledge there are no Jewish Eskimoes but that would be an interesting concept too.)

Maybe one family is ethnically Hawkawi Indian and they introduce thier new-in-laws to the tradition when the prim and proper WASP in-laws visit for Christmas at Aspen. The WASP father is totally ok with accepting such a 'gift' after a day on the slopes and a hot cocoa with schnapps. Will the WASP mom let go of what her neighbors back in Bridgeport would think. They are not here, and the 'kids' are a married couple who know about the tradition...

Love and Kisses

Lisa Ann

 

[Hypoxia]

(To my knowledge there are no Jewish Eskimoes but that would be an interesting concept too.)

You missed the Mad Magazine version of Ride The Wild Surf with Iceberg, a Jewish Eskimo super-surfer IIRC. So there's precedent.

Spin an alt.history: A heretical Sabbatean rabbi fled north from pogroms. Lapps passed him on to Inuits, who sent him to Athapaskans, who sent him to Yupiks, who passed him to Aleuts, and he converted a clan. All along the way, Eskimo guys and gals thought circumcision was kewl. Taking Sabbath breaks was great, too, and communal feeding, and no rules against mate-swapping, but that stuff about enslaving and selling daughters was a bit much. Still, they stayed kosher.

There's mighty surf in the Aleutian chain. Those Jewish Eskimo surfers worked hard and developed hard, icy styles. A clutch of guys, all capped with sealskin yarmulkes, descended on Maverick's Beach and stomped the competition like Kenyan marathon runners. They got all the surfer girls, of course. To the victors go the spoiled.

Oh wait, the mate-swapping. Well, spouses back home; and prize girls in Santa Cruz can pretend to be inlaws. Close enough for LIT. Or they brought their spouses; all the inlaws and prize girls are swapped around, grouped, kinked, fun fun fun. And all because of Chief Iceberg.

 

[Gunter99]

Fabulous idea!

This is another idea that I might put into a story of my own at some point, but in any case, I'd like to see what anyone else might do with it too.

The basic premise is fairly simple. A sexually liberated family has a tradition in which the sharing of sexual access to spouses is considered an expression of familial solidarity. Each spouse and the other spouse's siblings (and maybe even parents) are at least permitted if not gently encouraged to aid in satisfying each other's sexual needs.

The other key aspect is that nobody in this unusually close-knit family really cares about privacy among fellow members. They often treat sex almost as if it's just scratching an itch. They don't care if anyone else is in the room or not, and any incidental witnesses react with amusement at most.

For example, let's say we have a married couple of 24-year-olds who've taken in hubby's 19-year-old brother since they live near the university he attends. For double the fun, maybe wifey's similarly aged sister also lives with them for the same reason. Little bro wakes up with morning wood and groggily trudges into the kitchen, where sis-in-law is making breakfast. He casually pulls her pajama pants down and unloads himself into her pussy. She clearly enjoys it and may even climax herself. On the flip side, maybe little sis likes to drop her pants and ask hubby to fill her hole as a means of after-school relaxation.

Personally, I think it would be hottest if they usually do it from behind (e.g. doggy or prone-bone) and undress only to the extent needed for easy access. That would highlight the largely spontaneous and pragmatic nature of most encounters.

Would really like to see this turn into a multi-part story with a new couple joining the fun

 

[CuteSlaveLisa]

You missed the Mad Magazine version of Ride The Wild Surf with Iceberg, a Jewish Eskimo super-surfer IIRC. So there's precedent.

Spin an alt.history: A heretical Sabbatean rabbi fled north from pogroms. Lapps passed him on to Inuits, who sent him to Athapaskans, who sent him to Yupiks, who passed him to Aleuts, and he converted a clan. All along the way, Eskimo guys and gals thought circumcision was kewl. Taking Sabbath breaks was great, too, and communal feeding, and no rules against mate-swapping, but that stuff about enslaving and selling daughters was a bit much. Still, they stayed kosher.

There's mighty surf in the Aleutian chain. Those Jewish Eskimo surfers worked hard and developed hard, icy styles. A clutch of guys, all capped with sealskin yarmulkes, descended on Maverick's Beach and stomped the competition like Kenyan marathon runners. They got all the surfer girls, of course. To the victors go the spoiled.

Oh wait, the mate-swapping. Well, spouses back home; and prize girls in Santa Cruz can pretend to be inlaws. Close enough for LIT. Or they brought their spouses; all the inlaws and prize girls are swapped around, grouped, kinked, fun fun fun. And all because of Chief Iceberg.

Cool you could put it to music...
I suggest the S.F. Bay Area's own Meshugge Beach Party
3 escaped east coast "Yiddische Boys," a Goy (named Bacon) and a Goyl (girl) who mash up minor key traditional Jewish melodies and California surf-music...

Not making this up, truth is far stranger than fiction.

Love and Kisses

Lisa Ann

 

[LupusDei]

For a different spin, here, in times of war (and that's pretty much constant occurrence for past eight centuries) it's duty of a man to look after safety and wellbeing not only of his own wife and sisters, but also wife's sisters and wives of brothers in their absence (yes, the list is in order of priority).

For historical example, during German occupation my grandfather was home for a while. (1941-1944, after deserting Red Army he was transferred into from army of Latvia in result of Soviet occupation, and until got forcefully recruited in Wafen SS and sent for anti-tank training to Czechoslovakia. For context, he knew one of his brothers serve as tank commander in Red Army.)

He rebuilt his farm, and in practice joined households with one of his wife's sisters living next door. He also provided for wife of one of his brother's living in the city; older brother took care of the other two. It was specially acceptable back then, even expected. Neither of the guys returned. Brother's wife remarried after the war. Wife's sister never did, continuing to live alone with two sons as close family friend. I spent a lot of time at her home in my childhood, playing with her granddaughters.

Custom has remained from older times when surviving the war for non-combatants involved going out to prepared secret hideouts deep in marshlands, while the farmland was looted and scorched to the point "no rooster can hear another" as Count Sheremetyev wrote back to Peter the Great. It say absolutely nothing about sex, but in the Lit land we can easily imply it's included in basic needs. We can also repurpose it for lot less dramatic circumstances and shorter periods of absence, until it just blends.

 

[Hypoxia]

Cool you could put it to music...
I suggest the S.F. Bay Area's own Meshugge Beach Party ... who mash up minor key traditional Jewish melodies and California surf-music...

Let's not forget heavy-metal Hasids. But when I lived in the Hasid musical hippy commune House Of Love And Prayer all the guitars were acoustic.

For a different spin, here, in times of war (and that's pretty much constant occurrence for past eight centuries) it's duty of a man...

But there's nothing about sharing mates. I've not researched which cultures beside Esquimau practice that. We must merely invent some.

 

[RedHatter76]

Well, for whatever it's worth, I finally wrote my take on this premise.

https://www.literotica.com/s/swingers-in-law

I might write further installments, depending somewhat on how it performs in terms of ratings/favorites. I welcome feedback!

 

[Hypoxia]

Well, for whatever it's worth, I finally wrote my take on this premise.

https://www.literotica.com/s/swingers-in-law

I might write further installments, depending somewhat on how it performs in terms of ratings/favorites. I welcome feedback!

I find the story hard to read because 1) walls of text, 2) huge info dump at the start, 3) no hook to grab me, and 4) much telling with little showing. I could not get into any story 'flow'. But maybe that's just me.

My take on the concept: The two basic paths are a) mate-sharing but no blood-kin fucking, in-laws only, and b) happy incest, too. Either way, being in a social setting, not just wild anarchy, they're most likely to have firm or flexible rules on status, availability, timings, etc.

A big family is a small tribe. Order matters. It's cousin Nellie Bly's turn with Gramps Redbird tonight but he's flat from doing Dixxi so Uncle Smud fills in. Anyone looking available may be fair game. Same-sex and groups may be welcome, or not, or it depends. Heirarchies, contentions, rule-breaking, pride and jealousy, fevers, visitors, can give internal conflict and drama.

Without kin-fucking it's still a nice Group carnival. With kin-fucking it's hot Incest. With limitations on who fucks whom, it's drama that can morph into Scooby-Doo chases and wild reconciliations. Again, I refer to the concept in general, not your story specifically. I'm just format sensitive. Cheers!

 

[RedHatter76]

I find the story hard to read because 1) walls of text, 2) huge info dump at the start, 3) no hook to grab me, and 4) much telling with little showing. I could not get into any story 'flow'. But maybe that's just me.

I know it's been a while, but I wanted to thank you for the feedback! I do have a habit of trying to comprehensively establish the context/premise up-front. You'll probably notice this in the respective first installments of my breastfeeding fetish series, too. Also, I did sort of whiz through the type of encounters that became semi-routine in the household, perhaps in a rush to get to the part(s) that I at least considered a bit more interesting. In short, I take most of your critiques on board and definitely understand where they're coming from.

My take on the concept: The two basic paths are a) mate-sharing but no blood-kin fucking, in-laws only, and b) happy incest, too. Either way, being in a social setting, not just wild anarchy, they're most likely to have firm or flexible rules on status, availability, timings, etc.

I'm not comfortable with incest, so you'll likely never get such content from me. Now, pseudo-incest (e.g. stepsiblings, adopted siblings) is a completely different story, as I'm actually all for that! No blood, no foul, as I like to say.

A big family is a small tribe. Order matters. It's cousin Nellie Bly's turn with Gramps Redbird tonight but he's flat from doing Dixxi so Uncle Smud fills in. Anyone looking available may be fair game. Same-sex and groups may be welcome, or not, or it depends. Heirarchies, contentions, rule-breaking, pride and jealousy, fevers, visitors, can give internal conflict and drama.

I'm back and forth on what I want the protocol to be regarding inter-generational relations. I'm considering two different options. In the first, any sexual activity at all with parents-in-law is as prohibited as it would be in any other family. In the second, essentially everything except penis-in-vagina (e.g. oral, handjobs/fingering, maybe even anal) is fair game. The main reason is that I think allowing potentially reproductive sex between generations would tangle the family tree beyond what I think is manageable. The arrangement I describe in the introduction to my story is probably already enough of a stretch. Of course, there are such things as condoms and the like, but using them would undercut the spontaneity and nonchalance that, for me at least, make the sex itself especially hot.

I'm quite likely to incorporate some lesbian stuff if the story becomes a series. I've all but decided that the three brothers that have already been introduced (the oldest, Kevin, in name only) have two sisters also, and the oldest brother's wife (Olivia) has been mentioned only in passing. So it would be very easy to make Olivia bisexual and thus inclined to have fun with whichever of her sisters-in-law happens to be compatibly oriented.

As for drama, it's not very likely in my particular take on this premise, since it's not really relevant to the main point/purpose of the story. The main idea is largely just to turn the reader on with the idea of swinging in-laws as well as the often spontaneous and nonchalant nature of the relations that ensue in that context.