Castration of a womaniser, can this be considered erotic fiction?

SGP85

Virgin
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Posts
14
This is the basic storyline I have in mind:

Main character is something of a misogynist who enjoys fucking women and dominating them in a degrading manner, using and abusing. However, he meets a woman he falls in love with and his behaviour changes.

Then, a recently jilted ex returns after several weeks to collect some belongings, having been thrown out onto the street to make way for his new lover. She catches the pair of lovers engaging in some kinky sex with her ex tied to a chair, defenceless. She decides to do the dirty deed of depriving him of his penis. A brief catfight ensues, and the vengeful ex ties her rival to chair, then turns her attentions to her helpless victim and removes his manhood after making he begs her not to do it. She then seeks to dispose of it. His lover looks on in horror, helpless to intervene.

He is taken to hospital and treated by a group of female doctors who descend into hilarity as they discuss the wound and make jokes as they assess his stump and/or attempt to reattach the remnants.

The later part of the story revolves around his lover who stays with him, nursing him through the humiliation, soothing his torments, and trying to have a sex life.

I see it as a twisted love story with a heavy dose of black humour...tell me what you think!
 
Last edited:
I guess it could, but...

I doubt that you would get it passed the Lit censors.
 
Castration of a womaniser, can this be considered erotic fiction?
Only if you are a sadistic lesbian.

And I agree with nakedsub, you would probably have difficulties, except perhaps in erotic horror if the castrator is a magical entity.
 
Bizarrely, almost all castration erotica is written by men. Or perhaps not so bizarrely, if you realize that women generally don't think about balls very often.

It is bizarre, given that most women are tickled by castration and fantasise about it, apparently just not on a sexual level. Or perhaps a lot of women are uncomfortable in admitting or presenting these fantasies as erotica?
 
Although I would think it would not pass initially upon thinking about it, why shouldn't it?

There are more hardcore rape stories on this site and uncountable stories of sexual trafficking where girls are drugged and repeatedly gang raped.

Why shouldn't this go through? Because it's a man getting his?

Write it and post it and I'll give you a 5!
 
Write it and post it and I'll give you a 5!

Regardless of the quality? I think we now have evidence to the contrary of sunandshadow's claim.

Perhaps you can play a role in it...

Occupation:
Medical field


Urology by any chance? ;)
 
Last edited:
Regardless of the quality? I think we now have evidence to the contrary of sunandshadow's claim.

Perhaps you can play a role in it...

Occupation:
Medical field


Urology by any chance? ;)

Ha-ha! No, I manage a doctor's office during the day and I see patients at night as a counselor (my own business). I also volunteer at a home for abused women and deal with a lot of women who have been raped.

That is why I will give your story a five.:kiss:
 
Ha-ha! No, I manage a doctor's office during the day and I see patients at night as a counselor (my own business). I also volunteer at a home for abused women and deal with a lot of women who have been raped.

That is why I will give your story a five.:kiss:

I see...makes sense. Well, I don't like to disappoint so I'll have a go at getting it typed up and posted over the weekend.
 
Last edited:
Well technically, "castration" is removal of the testicles, not the penis.

Not that that would make much difference to the victim! Loss of either asset is bound to be a cause for concern......
 
Castration can mean the removal of either or both; removal of the penis is referred to as castration in several fields, psychology and psychoanalysis most notably...

I think most guys would opt to keep their dick, viagra would solve any problems with impotence...I am unaware of any successful remedies for dicklessness!
 
Castration can mean the removal of either or both; removal of the penis is referred to as castration in several fields, psychology and psychoanalysis most notably...

I think most guys would opt to keep their dick, viagra would solve any problems with impotence...I am unaware of any successful remedies for dicklessness!
There is also "chemical castration" where sexual desire is removed by prescribed medication.
 
Castration can mean the removal of either or both; removal of the penis is referred to as castration in several fields, psychology and psychoanalysis most notably...

I think most guys would opt to keep their dick, viagra would solve any problems with impotence...I am unaware of any successful remedies for dicklessness!

No, castration is all about the 'nads. Anyone who uses it otherwise is using it incorrectly. Removal of the penis is properly called a penectomy.
 
Anyone who uses it otherwise is using it incorrectly.

You can arbitrate semantics to vindicate your own incorrect preconception of a word's meaning if you want, but it doesn't change the fact that castration has been used in reference to penis removal for well over 100 years, at least since Freud.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castration_anxiety

There is nothing incorrect about its usage in this context.
 
Whatever, dude. In this day and age when "Phat" is a good thing and L8R is an acceptable spelling of "later," your particular brand of illiteracy seems to fly with the general public. I'll stick with my accurate and correct definitions of words, if you don't mind.......Carney
 
No, castration is all about the 'nads. Anyone who uses it otherwise is using it incorrectly. Removal of the penis is properly called a penectomy.
You can arbitrate semantics to vindicate your own incorrect preconception of a word's meaning if you want, but it doesn't change the fact that castration has been used in reference to penis removal for well over 100 years, at least since Freud.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castration_anxiety

There is nothing incorrect about its usage in this context.
The dreaded Oxford English Dictionary says:
1 Remove the testicles of; geld; fig. deprive of potency, vigour, or force.
2 Expurgate (a text).

Merriam-Webster says:
1: to render impotent or deprive of vitality especially by psychological means
2: a: to deprive of the testes : geld - b: to deprive of the ovaries : spay

Perhaps Merriam-Webster is out of date?
 
immasculation: cutting their dick off

Castration: balls

As for the story idea, I don't think it will pass, not so much for the dick chopping off (there was a horror story on here about a defense lawyer who got a rapist acquited so she could chop his dick off after he came and got it taxidermied after he suffocated from her sitting on his face/blood loss) more for the humiliation by the doctor and attempts to have sex with the stump being played for laughs.

It seems excessively cruel to have him be humiliated while he just had his dick cut off (how'd he survive anyway? if his girlfriend was tied up and he had his dick cut off, he should have died in about 20 minutes from the blood loss (unless he wasn't tied up and didn't go into shock from having his manhood removed)).

Men getting theirs is a fine theme and even immasculation/castration can be done right...but not the way you're suggesting...frankly, I think it's sick
 
Whatever, dude. In this day and age when "Phat" is a good thing and L8R is an acceptable spelling of "later," your particular brand of illiteracy seems to fly with the general public. I'll stick with my accurate and correct definitions of words, if you don't mind.......Carney

Do you really believe that someone using a term correctly in its Freudian psychosexual context, in reference to a story inspired directly be those same psychosexual theories, on a forum called Literotica, is really akin to someone using "Phat" or "L8R" and truly representative of the general public's trend towards illiteracy?

Regardless of your apparent disdain for the dumbing-down of society, you're evidently ignorant of Freudian, Jungian or psychoanalytic theory any sort and therefore ignorant of psychology in general; an insistence that "I must be right" prevents you from learning a well-established meaning of the word in a highy influential field of thought.

If cognitive dissonance is something you can overcome, you should learn its meaning also...

:caning:

The dreaded Oxford English Dictionary says:
1 Remove the testicles of; geld; fig. deprive of potency, vigour, or force.
2 Expurgate (a text).

Merriam-Webster says:
1: to render impotent or deprive of vitality especially by psychological means
2: a: to deprive of the testes : geld - b: to deprive of the ovaries : spay

Perhaps Merriam-Webster is out of date?

If you were familiar with these ideas, you would have realised that both dictionaries give a perfectly acceptable definition - fig. deprive of potency, vigour, or force and to render impotent or deprive of vitality especially by psychological means.

You will find a lot of dictionaries also define Freudian terms specifically...

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/castration+complex?q=castration+complex

noun
Psychoanalysis

(in Freudian theory) an unconscious anxiety arising during psychosexual development, represented in males as a fear that the penis will be removed by the father in response to sexual interest in the mother, and in females as a compulsion to demonstrate that they have an adequate symbolic equivalent to the penis, whose absence is blamed on the mother.
 
Last edited:
As for the story idea, I don't think it will pass, not so much for the dick chopping off (there was a horror story on here about a defense lawyer who got a rapist acquited so she could chop his dick off after he came and got it taxidermied after he suffocated from her sitting on his face/blood loss) more for the humiliation by the doctor and attempts to have sex with the stump being played for laughs.

Hmmm...and that was where I started!

It seems excessively cruel to have him be humiliated while he just had his dick cut off (how'd he survive anyway? if his girlfriend was tied up and he had his dick cut off, he should have died in about 20 minutes from the blood loss (unless he wasn't tied up and didn't go into shock from having his manhood removed)).

She would free herself, call an ambulance, and try to stop the bleeding blow-job style with her mouth.

Men getting theirs is a fine theme and even immasculation/castration can be done right...but not the way you're suggesting...frankly, I think it's sick

Its disturbing but probably not as sick as you're probably thinking, its essentially a love story.

In what ways do you think can it be done right, out of interest?
 
SGP85 - you are free to dumb down the language all you want in your own 'hood. Just don't expect the educated members of society to adopt your hip-hop bastardizations of the language as standard usage. Fo shizzle?
 
Back
Top