G
Guest
Guest
Friends of wit and suaveness: Pierce Brosnan is making only one more (currently) Bond film. The NYTimes article (link below) discusses past and future Bonds. I know anyone who loves “Bond” usually has particular, if not vehement, preferences for the body that fills, and takes off, the Saville Row suits. So I ask for your passionate opinions.
Mine: Sean Connery was it, full stop. But I was satisfied to read why Timothy Dalton did not make it (he is “muy hombre” for me; tr., “all man”). I appreciate Brosnan, best after Sean, but he was not Sean.
I larfed to read Mel Gibson was once a real candidate, the pea brain. You'll read interesting goss too about Ian Fleming, an "elitist's elitist".
Perdita. Perdita.
Bond. James, uh...
Mine: Sean Connery was it, full stop. But I was satisfied to read why Timothy Dalton did not make it (he is “muy hombre” for me; tr., “all man”). I appreciate Brosnan, best after Sean, but he was not Sean.
I larfed to read Mel Gibson was once a real candidate, the pea brain. You'll read interesting goss too about Ian Fleming, an "elitist's elitist".
Perdita. Perdita.
Bond. James, uh...