Can You Get Dear With A Dead Deer?

[Wildcard Ky]

Okay, this one takes the cake. It definitely falls in the Too strange to be fiction category. Dude screwed a roadkill deer.

Wisconsin motion argues sex with animal carcass not a crime

NOVEMBER 16--Meet Bryan James Hathaway, alleged venison lover. The Wisconsin man, 20, is facing charges that he had sex last month with a dead deer. Hathaway, who previously has served time for killing a horse he intended to sexually assault, allegedly found the deer in a ditch alongside a roadway. Now Hathaway's lawyer has filed a court motion (a copy of which you'll find here) arguing that since the animal was already dead, Hathaway should not face a misdemeanor rap of sexual gratification with an animal. "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass," lawyer Fredric Anderson wrote in the motion filed in Douglas County Circuit Court. As reported in today's Daily Telegram, in response to Anderson's motion, prosecutor James Boughner noted that state criminal statutes did not seem to "draw a line between the living and the dead." Judge Michael Lucci, who heard motion arguments Tuesday, said he will issue a decision by December 1.


This guy AND his lawyer should both be taken out and shot at sunrise....

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1116061deer1.html

 

[cheerful_deviant]

Well, In the wierdo's defence, the deer definitly didn't care anymore.

Gotta kinda pitty the Judge that got this case, don't cha?

 

[Zeb_Carter]

Okay, this one takes the cake. It definitely falls in the Too strange to be fiction category. Dude screwed a roadkill deer.

Wisconsin motion argues sex with animal carcass not a crime

NOVEMBER 16--Meet Bryan James Hathaway, alleged venison lover. The Wisconsin man, 20, is facing charges that he had sex last month with a dead deer. Hathaway, who previously has served time for killing a horse he intended to sexually assault, allegedly found the deer in a ditch alongside a roadway. Now Hathaway's lawyer has filed a court motion (a copy of which you'll find here) arguing that since the animal was already dead, Hathaway should not face a misdemeanor rap of sexual gratification with an animal. "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass," lawyer Fredric Anderson wrote in the motion filed in Douglas County Circuit Court. As reported in today's Daily Telegram, in response to Anderson's motion, prosecutor James Boughner noted that state criminal statutes did not seem to "draw a line between the living and the dead." Judge Michael Lucci, who heard motion arguments Tuesday, said he will issue a decision by December 1.


This guy AND his lawyer should both be taken out and shot at sunrise....

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1116061deer1.html

Was he wearing boots? *too lazy to read the story

 

[CrimsonMaiden]

Let me just say: EWWWWW!!!!

 

[bronzeage]

No where in this story, does it say how he got caught.

Was he still on the public right of way? It also doesn't specify if the carcass was a doe. This is important, because buck fucking carries a heavier fine.

 

[TheeGoatPig]

Why the laywer? He doesn't care if the person is guilty or not. It's his job to get the person out of trouble no matter what.

 

[R. Richard]

Let's try to analyze the problem, not the symptoms.

The guy was arrested before for killing a horse in order to have sex with the dead horse. Sort of reading between the lines, the guy found an already dead deer and had sex with it.

In my unlicensed, professional opinion, the guy is in the mental state, "nutty as a fruitcake." His specific symptom is that he likes to have sex with dead animals. Children [and adults] are animals. Given the situations for which he has already been arrested, it is reasonable to assume that "fruitcake boy" will continue to want to have sex with dead animals. From the story, he was already at least preparing to have sex with a dead horse and had sex with a dead deer. Once "fruitcake boy" tries a dead cow, dead dog, dead etc., it seems that he might well try a dead human. This last presents a clear and present danger to the communities in which he lives/around where he lives.

There are two ways to attack the problem:

1) Reactive: Wait until he kills a kid or young woman and then grieve.
2) Proactive: Make it impossible for him to kill a kid or young woman.

The choice is yours. The choice does not exist for the child or young woman.

JMNTHO.