Can The SCROTEs Be Held Liable For Violating The ADA?

[jaF0]

They have said the disabled cannot vote at polling sites by handing their ballots to official poll workers from their cars.

This seems like nothing less than a violation of the ADA and vote suppression. Are the SCROTEs that voted against disabled Americans subject to Impeachment?

 

[butters]

how do they get away with this shit? it's a clear example of trying to suppress voting, especially since the disabled people have a 'pre-existing condition' and so might be invested in not losing that protection the aca affords them

 

[icanhelp1]

They have said the disabled cannot vote at polling sites by handing their ballots to official poll workers from their cars.

This seems like nothing less than a violation of the ADA and vote suppression. Are the SCROTEs that voted against disabled Americans subject to Impeachment?

What state?

 

[Lazaran]

.
icanhelp1 is obviously a Trump supporter who doesn't follow the news and can't perform a simple Internet search. I'll give him/her a hint; it's one of the southern A-hole states.

SAD!!!

 

[phrodeau]

It’s Alabama.

If you’re disabled in Alabama, voting is the least of your problems.

 

[icanhelp1]

.
icanhelp1 is obviously a Trump supporter who doesn't follow the news and can't perform a simple Internet search. I'll give him/her a hint; it's one of the southern A-hole states.

SAD!!!

If someone post a partial statement from a news article I would half expect a supporting document or at least cite the source.

That's impolite to force everyone to chase it down.

How could you possibly ascertain I'm a Trump supporter by my merely posting a relevant question?

 

[Lazaran]

.
icanhelp1 is obviously a lazy snowflake who relies on others to do everything for him/her.

SAD!!!

 

[KeithD]

They have said the disabled cannot vote at polling sites by handing their ballots to official poll workers from their cars.

This seems like nothing less than a violation of the ADA and vote suppression. Are the SCROTEs that voted against disabled Americans subject to Impeachment?

Yes, that was a very strange ruling. Ammunition for packing the court with better justices--ones centered on the law as it serves common sense and service to the citizenship, not some party line.

 

[icanhelp1]

I interpreted the article as more along the lines of protecting against an activist judge who was attempting to change the state's constitution by circumventing the proper legislative process.