Bush shows his true colors

REDWAVE

Urban Jungle Dweller
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Posts
6,013
My, my, the Repubs just got over that big flap with Trent "I'm not a racist scumbag! I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!" Lott, and here we go again. Bush just came out strongly against Michigan's affirmative action program, deciding to intervene in the pending lawsuit before the Supreme Court. This will really make it difficult to fool anyone into believing the Republicans aren't racists. Why don't they just come clean, and rename themselves the Racist Party? At least then they wouldn't be hypocrites also: just racist, sexist, homophobic pigs! Of course, Bush paid shallow, obviously insincere lip service to "diversity," but he's clearly doing this to please his racist base. He claims he's against Michigan's affirmative action program because it gives underserved rewards based on race. Of course, he has no problem with rich white men like himself receiving undeserved rewards based upon their race and class. It only when they favor blacks he has a problem with it. His feigned moral outrage over affirmative action is especially amusing, considering he owes his Presidency in large part to massive disenfranchisement of African-American voters in Florida by his brother Jeb. What monumental effrontery and audacious hypocrisy on his part, literally breath-taking in its epic scope!
 
REDWAVE said:
My, my, the Repubs just got over that big flap with Trent "I'm not a racist scumbag! I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!" Lott, and here we go again. Bush just came out strongly against Michigan's affirmative action program, deciding to intervene in the pending lawsuit before the Supreme Court. This will really make it difficult to fool anyone into believing the Republicans aren't racists. Why don't they just come clean, and rename themselves the Racist Party? At least then they wouldn't be hypocrites also: just racist, sexist, homophobic pigs! Of course, Bush paid shallow, obviously insincere lip service to "diversity," but he's clearly doing this to please his racist base. He claims he's against Michigan's affirmative action program because it gives underserved rewards based on race. Of course, he has no problem with rich white men like himself receiving undeserved rewards based upon their race and class. It only when they favor blacks he has a problem with it. His feigned moral outrage over affirmative action is especially amusing, considering he owes his Presidency in large part to massive disenfranchisement of African-American voters in Florida by his brother Jeb. What monumental effrontery and audacious hypocrisy on his part, literally breath-taking in its epic scope!

Redrave is clearly a racist, since he favors racial preferences.
 
REDWAVE said:
My, my, the Repubs just got over that big flap with Trent "I'm not a racist scumbag! I'm not! I'm not! I'm not!" Lott, and here we go again. Bush just came out strongly against Michigan's affirmative action program, deciding to intervene in the pending lawsuit before the Supreme Court. This will really make it difficult to fool anyone into believing the Republicans aren't racists. Why don't they just come clean, and rename themselves the Racist Party? At least then they wouldn't be hypocrites also: just racist, sexist, homophobic pigs! Of course, Bush paid shallow, obviously insincere lip service to "diversity," but he's clearly doing this to please his racist base. He claims he's against Michigan's affirmative action program because it gives underserved rewards based on race. Of course, he has no problem with rich white men like himself receiving undeserved rewards based upon their race and class. It only when they favor blacks he has a problem with it. His feigned moral outrage over affirmative action is especially amusing, considering he owes his Presidency in large part to massive disenfranchisement of African-American voters in Florida by his brother Jeb. What monumental effrontery and audacious hypocrisy on his part, literally breath-taking in its epic scope!

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Ishmael
 
cindy_lauper.jpeg
 
Phoenyx said:

Redrave has his panties all twisted in a knot and here we are, hijacking the thread. It hardly seems fair.
Back to the issue at hand …
Redrave is correct when he states Democrats are racists because they foist programs such as welfare and public housing on minorities, helping assure lives of grinding poverty for many of them.
 
So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

I take it from your replies that Bush and the Republican Party are not racists.

Why not tell the rest of us why they're not, or is that an impossible task.

Right Wingers are racist by nature. They're conservatives. No change, no alteration and definitely no deviation from the WASP mentality...

But in the interests of fair play I'd like to see you all lay out your argument...

But then again...

Maybe you can't, because you know it's true...

ppman
 
so i guess that rice lady and hte military dude and others are just wearing a lot of make up, or are they just token players
 
Re: Re: Bush shows his true colors

Ishmael said:
A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Ishmael




Ishmael


You are obviously much more aware of the backgrounds of those you just named as rape victims and the rape thread(s) than I am.

I became aware of Muff's experience and wrote her to let her know how badly I felt about our arguments and her reaction to my one joke BDSM scene post in light of having learned of her experience.

As I told her at the time, I didn't read the details of her post...I scanned it and got out of the thread right away when I realized what I'd seen.

The others you have named... I wasn't aware of their personal revelations at the times I responded to their attacks against me, and in fact until you said it here I was completely unaware of most of their histories in this regard.

Whereas you have named them as rape victims after the threads have (you say) been taken down.

Your act strikes me as highly improper.

But that sort of thing likely doesn't cross your mind in your blind self-serving attack on me.

Are they Republicans? Do they drive SUV's?

As for this assertion:

"Where Hanns goes, you follow. Always Lance. "

Obviously that is not possible. He is not here, for example....so much for "always".

So, yes, please provide an Excel spreadsheet as a link in your reply with a full concordance of every single one of Hanns' posts and the names of all those posting within three posts above and below in descending order of Lit users near him since he arrived.

Please also reproduce all posts in which Hanns has threatened another poster and I chimed in to agree that the other person should be "macked" or what have you.

But first, I think you should go edit the names out of your attack.

You sick old fuck.

Lance
 
Ham Murabi said:
Democrats are racists because they foist programs such as welfare and public housing on minorities, helping assure lives of grinding poverty for many of them.

You obviously don't know much about social welfare programs unless your knowledge comes from Right Wing sources.

And your knowledge of the political implications is even less.

A Right Wing Government purposely keeps a pool of unemployed to fill job vacancies that may arise and that haven't been factored into any forecast. It's the way they operate...

Always has been and always will be...

ppman
 
Lance,

I'm really hoping you're not going to make me scroll past the same post above too many more times.

It's just inconsiderate.

Thanks.
 
Problem Child said:
Lance,

I'm really hoping you're not going to make me scroll past the same post above too many more times.

It's just inconsiderate.

Thanks.

Ishmael (you know he of the boring one liner) posted it...

You're directing your usual trite remark at the wrong person...

But I suppose it does prove you don't actually read threads...

ppman
 
Re: So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

p_p_man said:
I take it from your replies that Bush and the Republican Party are not racists.
Why not tell the rest of us why they're not, or is that an impossible task.
Right Wingers are racist by nature. They're conservatives. No change, no alteration and definitely no deviation from the WASP mentality...
But in the interests of fair play I'd like to see you all lay out your argument...
But then again...
Maybe you can't, because you know it's true...
ppman

I'm sure you have a ready explanation for black and Hispanic conservatives. Are they, too, racist?
There is nothing racist in believing people should be judged on their abilities, not the color of their skin. I think I could make a case for those who believe the opposite.
You seem to be saying that black people can't get ahead without the heavy hand of government getting involved. That strikes me as racist. I believe, as a group, that black Americans are just as smart as every other race.
 
p_p_man said:
You obviously don't know much about social welfare programs unless your knowledge comes from Right Wing sources.
And your knowledge of the political implications is even less.
A Right Wing Government purposely keeps a pool of unemployed to fill job vacancies that may arise and that haven't been factored into any forecast. It's the way they operate...
Always has been and always will be...
ppman

I know plenty about the social (engineering) welfare programs I listed. Public housing as a rule devolves into a crime-infested slum miles from any meaningful job opportunities. Many of those public housing tracts you seem fond of have been destroyed at government expense.
Generations of welfare-dependent families, and the odd notion you could reward women for having children out of wedlock by giving them more money, was nothing but a disaster. Weaning people off welfare and putting them to work (make them get jobs) has been a great success story here in the U.S. How many capable people are "on the dole" in England, and do you enjoy paying for their lack of ambition.
As for a government policy of having a "pool of unemployed," that notion is laughable and doesn't merit a response, but I'll offer one anyone. What prosperous country has ever enjoyed 100 percent employment?
 
Revese dscrimination

Redwave is a black racist pig...He knows damn well that Affirmative Action is just fuckin fancy wording for reverse discrimination against white males...On top of that it's unconstitutional and always has been...


~~~JABO~~
 
Re: Re: So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

Ham Murabi said:
I believe, as a group, that black Americans are just as smart as every other race.

But do they get ahead with the same ease as other folk?

ppman
 
Re: Re: Re: So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

p_p_man said:
But do they get ahead with the same ease as other folk?

ppman

As a matter of fact, yes. Those with the drive do quite well, thank you.
 
Ham Murabi said:
I know plenty about the social (engineering) welfare programs I listed. Public housing as a rule devolves into a crime-infested slum miles from any meaningful job opportunities.

If you look back on the history of Public Housing you'll find that most programs were instigated and carried out by Right Wing governments. They did it for various reasons, certainly not to help the poor, one of which was to head off growing civil unrest between the two World Wars.

Being Right Wing, with an avowed aim to save public money, they built the housing in blocks of ghetto like estates giving birth to future high crime rates...

ppman
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

Ham Murabi said:
As a matter of fact, yes. Those with the drive do quite well, thank you.

That I doubt very much...

I said with the same ease. I'll bet a white man with few qualifications gets a job ahead of a black man with many...

ppman
 
Last edited:
Ham Murabi said:
What prosperous country has ever enjoyed 100 percent employment?

None. I agree. But at least Socialist Governments do their best to ease the burden of the unemployed whereas the Right Wing can offer nothing but blood, sweat and sneers...

ppman
 
p_p_man said:
If you look back on the history of Public Housing you'll find that most programs were instigated and carried out by Right Wing governments. They did it for various reasons, certainly not to help the poor, one of which was to head off growing civil unrest between the two World Wars.

Being Right Wing, with an avowed aim to save public money, they built the housing in blocks of ghetto like estates giving birth to future high crime rates...

ppman

Sorry, but the history of public housing in the U.S. was a byproduct of LBJ's "Great Society." Lyndon Baines Johnson was a Democrat, both houses of Congress were controlled by Democrats, and the public housing boondoggle was launched in the U.S.
As for "being Right Wing," your argument totally falls apart there if you equate being right wing with being conservative. A conservative never would have agreed to spending taxpayer money on public housing, knowing instinctively that the money would just be flushed down the toilet.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So Ham Murabi, Phoenyx, Problem Child, Ishmael and P.B. Walker...

p_p_man said:
That I doubt very much...

I said with the same ease. I'll bet a white man with few qualifications gets a job ahead of a black man with many...

ppman

Say it with the same ease if you wish. I've hired people. I've had to make payroll. Only a fool would hire a less-qualified person based on the color of their skin.
That's not to say there aren't any fools out there …
 
Back
Top