Bush Cybersecurity Chief Quits.

Lancecastor

Lit's Most Beloved Poster
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
54,670
Departing national cybersecurity chief issues warning
Judith Miller
New York Times

Published Feb. 2, 2003 CLAR02


Richard A. Clarke, the blunt, sometimes abrasive White House adviser who raised the alarm about security threats ranging from biological to computer terrorism for more than a decade, quietly resigned Friday as President Bush's cybersecurity czar.

In an interview after his last day in office, Clarke warned that although the government has made considerable progress in defending its electronic infrastructure from computer attacks, the United States faces ever greater peril, given its growing dependence on the Internet.

"A sophisticated cyberattack may not result in massive deaths," he said. "But it could really hurt our economy and diminish our ability to respond to a crisis, especially if it is combined with a war, or a terrorist attack."

Clarke said the attack last weekend by a computer bug known as the Sapphire worm showed the vulnerability of America's increasingly Internet-based economy. Though it was a relatively simple bug, he said, Sapphire, which also has been called Slammer, ravaged systems throughout the United States and overseas in just a few hours, shutting down some of the Bank of America's automated teller machines and Continental Airlines' online ticketing system, and denying Internet access to millions of personal computer owners.

Before tackling the country's computer vulnerabilities, Clarke was in charge of the White House's counterterrorism office for Bush and Clinton. He sometimes antagonized officials in federal agencies and even some White House colleagues by demanding more aggressive action against Islamic extremists such as Osama bin Laden.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/3627912.html
 
Then it's lucky that I am such a pack rat and detail oriented woman who doesn't trust the state of online security for anything more than reading my horoscope.

When hackers and crackers can break in to deny service, hijack webpages and manipulate and post false information, not to mention steal valuable information that used to be private and protected to some extent, I say there's a problem in the system.

I keep hard copy (paper) records of everything I do that relates to finances, legal matters, governmental documents and personal correspondence and dealings. But then again, I did that before the advent of the world wide web too.

The scary thing to me is that there no longer seems to be any sort of checks and balances. At least in person you'd have to produce identification. For withdrawing or transferring funds in a bank, for instance.

When requesting information from courts you used to have to provide reasons (not to mention complete various and sundry forms) prior to being given access to public records.

The ease and speed of transacting business on the internet seems to have made people let down their defenses. I still do not feel safe in using my credit card over the internet despite assurances a site uses SSL technology. We have seen instances where people have broken into MasterCard and Visa databases to steal credit card numbers.

Just recently we witnessed the case where an employee of a credit bureau sold credit information on over 30,000 people. So, I have to laugh when people talk about net security. There aint no such animal. Criminals have found an easy way to circumvent laws all from the comfort of their own living rooms it would seem.

At the risk of sounding the conspiracy alarm bell, it would seem prudent to remove those institutions that deal with our national security, power grid and economic backbone from public access. Isn't there some sort of intranet they could form? I remember seeing something about www2 and www3 systems a few years ago that dealt with just such a proposal. Their password systems and backdoors were supposed to be much tougher to infiltrate than the worldwideweb we enjoy.
 
Agent99 said:


At the risk of sounding the conspiracy alarm bell, it would seem prudent to remove those institutions that deal with our national security, power grid and economic backbone from public access. Isn't there some sort of intranet they could form? I remember seeing something about www2 and www3 systems a few years ago that dealt with just such a proposal. Their password systems and backdoors were supposed to be much tougher to infiltrate than the worldwideweb we enjoy.

Just last week The Personal Insurance Company in Canada announced a revelation and apology...a hard drive with the Social Insurance, Birthdate, Names and other Identity Data on 180,000 customers is "lost" and presumed stolen from a storage facility.

Personal Data Security is rapidly becoming the issue in the information economy.

Everywhere we go, people we don't know are gathering data on us.

Banner ad agency DoubleClick is possibly the scariest company operating on the Internet.


Lance
 
Didn't Interpol or FBI arrested two Russian hackers who stole credit card infos and sold them to the Mob for, I think, $300 million a couple of years ago?

Anyway, my questionis this:

Suppose you used your credit card to buy books from Amazon.com. This is the only time you used on-line shopping.

The bill arrives and there were charges for tens of thousand $ worth fo on-line shopping.

Who's fault whould this be? Can you sue Amazon.com for the damage? Do you have to pay the bank by yourself?
 
ChilledVodka said:
Didn't Interpol or FBI arrested two Russian hackers who stole credit card infos and sold them to the Mob for, I think, $300 million a couple of years ago?

Anyway, my questionis this:

Suppose you used your credit card to buy books from Amazon.com. This is the only time you used on-line shopping.

The bill arrives and there were charges for tens of thousand $ worth fo on-line shopping.

Who's fault whould this be? Can you sue Amazon.com for the damage? Do you have to pay the bank by yourself?

There was a big credit-card scam involving the Russian Mob out of Vancouver just before Christmas as well.

As for your Question...most credit card companies protect you from fraudulent use of your card. Report it and it gets removed. No problem.

The card companies control merchant fraud in deciding who they give merchant accounts to.

The merchants pay a percentage of every sale to the card company to cover fraud and other costs. In the case of some frauds, the merchant loses the sale and their merchandise.

Credit card holders are much safer online than the television and print media wants you to know...because the Internet can put them and their advertising stores largely out of business.

Lance
 
Lancecastor said:
because the Internet can put them and their advertising stores largely out of business.
That figures.

Why am I thinking of Gas based automobiles vs hydro/solar-mobiles...
 
ChilledVodka said:
That figures.

Why am I thinking of Gas based automobiles vs hydro/solar-mobiles...

Bush picked hydrogen based car research funding because it's the furthest from production right now.

Electric/hybrid and fuel cell engines already exist.
 
Lancecastor said:
Bush picked hydrogen based car research funding because it's the furthest from production right now.

Electric/hybrid and fuel cell engines already exist.
Yah, doesn't the Swiss use those cars which runs on water? That's cool.

Solar pannels are my fav. They look so pretty on the roofs of houses, refrecting rays of sunshine.
 
Back
Top