Bush, channeler

[Pure]

I can't forbear repeating this titillating piece.

Check the picture at

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html

Bush, at the debate, had a square lumpish thing beneath his coat, on his back; say, maybe 3 by 4 ins, and 1/2 to 1 inch thick.

Speculation is that is might be something connected to an implant within the ear.

Apparently radio frequencies, on one previous speech, found a voice, giving a line, then Bush repeating it.

http://www.isbushwired.com/

So, WHO is Bush channeling????

I'm thinking perhaps the next step is to have a deep voiced actor read a speech, and the Prez do some lip synching! Hey, it works for Britney and Madonna.

 

[cantdog]

I'd have expected Rove to be slicker

But I have no doubt in the world it was something along those lines. This is high-stakes stuff.

He still blew it, though. Maybe Karl doesn't think on his feet very well, either.

 

[carsonshepherd]

People need to know this, it should be freakin' front page news. His handlers are too afraid to turn him loose on his own because they know he'll say something stupid.
Like this:http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

http://www.hedweb.com/wirehead/rat.jpg


Ha!

I KNEW Bush was a wirehead.


http://www.hedweb.com/wirehead/ratsot.jpg

 

[Pure]

Here is a little wrinkle I liked.

It's possible this 'prompting' practice evolved. You see, it became obvious that 'teleprompters' would be of limited use.

They require *reading.*

Hence oral prompting for a pre-set speech.

From that, to oral prompting of answers to questions.

Damn, this is strange. We already know, there's hardly even a spontaneous question, that all are prescreened, at press conferences, for instance. Well, if the questions are known, answers can be prepared ahead of time, prompted, and mouthed.

This is getting into the territory of the 'unreal', like the theory that there was no actual moon landing; it was done in studio.

 

[LadyJeanne]

People need to know this, it should be freakin' front page news. His handlers are too afraid to turn him loose on his own because they know he'll say something stupid.
Like this:http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm

This one was my fave:

"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a hat." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2004

There should be an SAT test for presidents. Free societies are to hopeful socities as whim is to ___

a) frolic
b) belief
c) drop
d) hat
e) Dick

 

[Edward Teach]

Regardless of what that little box is, don't you just know that they already have an answer spun for immediate distribution.

"The president, enduring excruciating pain, hence his bending over his podium during the debate, is participating in a revolutionary, top secret experiment in nerve stimulation which will benefit our brave soldiers who have been wounded in battle. Yes, the same brave soldiers John Kerry refused to support during the Viet Nam war and refuses to support today. Also, this research will hopefully benefit the many little children suffering nerve related diseases, the same little children of working and middle class parents John Kerry cares nothing about and has refused to support time and again."



Ed

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people - and neither do we."

George W. Bush, August 5, 2004 as quoted by the BBC.


"Secondly, the tactics of our—as you know, we don't have relationships with Iran. I mean, that's—ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no sanctions—you can't—we're out of sanctions."—Annandale, Va., Aug. 9, 2004



That's why I went to the Congress last September and proposed fundamental—supplemental funding, which is money for armor and body parts and ammunition and fuel."—Erie, Pa., Sept. 4, 2004

Er ... does that mean he bought himself a new brain?


"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a hat."—Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2004 (Thanks to David Stanford.)

Nope! I guess not.


Some Nostalgia - Bushisms senior: "We're enjoying sluggish times, and not enjoying them very much."
- President Bush, 1/2/92


It appears as if Dubya is an unreasonable facsimile of his father.

 

[carsonshepherd]

Er ... does that mean he bought himself a new brain?

Very nearly any brain would be an improvement.

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

Very nearly any brain would be an improvement.

I have just had a horrible thought!

What if they removed Bush’s brain and replaced it with a four-inch midrange speaker? That way, when they wired him up, Dubya could just open his mouth and Karl Rove’s voice would pour out, ungarbed and clear.

As far as any policymaking goes, I am positive Bush could set better policy unhindered by his brain — if he is trusted with that duty — than any he has implemented in his encumbered past.

http://www.royston.dircon.co.uk/scariertoy.jpg

 

[Edward Teach]

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people - and neither do we."

George W. Bush, August 5, 2004 as quoted by the BBC.


"Secondly, the tactics of our—as you know, we don't have relationships with Iran. I mean, that's—ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no sanctions—you can't—we're out of sanctions."—Annandale, Va., Aug. 9, 2004



That's why I went to the Congress last September and proposed fundamental—supplemental funding, which is money for armor and body parts and ammunition and fuel."—Erie, Pa., Sept. 4, 2004

Er ... does that mean he bought himself a new brain?


"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a hat."—Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2004 (Thanks to David Stanford.)

Nope! I guess not.


Some Nostalgia - Bushisms senior: "We're enjoying sluggish times, and not enjoying them very much."
- President Bush, 1/2/92


It appears as if Dubya is an unreasonable facsimile of his father.

What's really, really scary is that I understand him most of the time.


Ed

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

I bet I got it out first.



Maybe.

 

[Guest]

Still no explanation, but

it was in today's NY Times.

The Mystery of the Bulge in the Jacket - ELISABETH BUMILLER

WASHINGTON, Oct. 8 - What was that bulge in the back of President Bush's suit jacket at the presidential debate in Miami last week?

According to rumors racing across the Internet this week, the rectangular bulge visible between Mr. Bush's shoulder blades was a radio receiver, transmitting answers from an offstage counselor into a hidden presidential earpiece. The prime suspect was Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's powerful political adviser.

When the online magazine Salon published an article about the rumors on Friday - the day of the second presidential debate, in St. Louis - the speculation reached such a pitch that White House and campaign officials found themselves inundated with calls.

First they said that pictures showing the bulge might have been doctored. But then, when the bulge turned out to be clearly visible in the television footage of the evening, they offered a different explanation. "There was nothing under his suit jacket," said Nicolle Devenish, the Bush campaign's communications director. "It was most likely a rumpling of that portion of his suit jacket, or a wrinkle in the fabric."

Ms. Devenish could not explain why the "rumpling" was in a rectangular shape.

Campaign and White House officials said that the bulge was not from a bulletproof vest; they said Mr. Bush was not wearing one. They said the bulge was definitely not a receiver.

 

[Xelebes]

Wait a minute... there is four volumes of this stuff?

 

[carsonshepherd]

They said the bulge was definitely not a receiver.

Don't even think it was! Because it wasn't! Nope, not a receiver. Nothing like that at all.

Does it really even fucking matter if it was or not anyway? If it wasn't, it might as well have been...

 

[OhMissScarlett]

You know, Madonna's defense for the lip-synching thing was that she had to sing and dance at the same time. Maybe George can use the same excuse for that song and dance he's always doing.

 

[Pure]

hey, I want some expert opinion:

where was the box, last night?

intrarectal?
intercrural?

or was there no box, just heavy neural programming of the brain, to emit statements like "He'll raise your taxes."

 

[Guest]

Hail to the Chief Presidential Jack-In-The-Box

http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-9/822586/bushbox.jpg


Maybe it should play 'Pop goes the weasel'

 

[Liar]

Seriously folks. What is this, the 80's? If you actually could see that thing through his jacket, it's way bigger than a regular cell phone.

I'll bet he had a little midget in there, whispering him the answers.

#L

 

[carsonshepherd]

"An aide to the prime minister of Canada called President Bush a moron. Well that's not fair. Here's a guy who never worked a day in his life, got rich off his Dad's money, lost the popular vote and ended up president. That's not a moron, that's genius!" —Jay Leno

 

[rgraham666]

Not from Shrub II, but it could be.

"Our long nightmare of peace and prosperity is finally over." The Onion.

I don't think it's a radio. It's probably Shrub II's brain slug.

 

[Just-Legal]

Ehehe, now what you need is a transmitter on the same frequency...

"I believe in a free market 2-11 at Park and Madison...."

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

ANY BETS?

If it was a radio transmitter, does anybody believe that the Dems do not have a guy sitting in the audience with a small portable jambing device in his pants, waiting for a propitious question . . . .

 

[The_old_man]

A radio reciever? Quite probably set to the National Security frequency. Could have been dual freq. so he could get crib notes as well.

 

[Just-Legal]

ANY BETS?

If it was a radio transmitter, does anybody believe that the Dems do not have a guy sitting in the audience with a small portable jambing device in his pants, waiting for a propitious question . . . .

Eheheh, no, what they needed was a small device to get the damn thing to issue feedback and shock him...