Britain, Ann Coulter sez:...

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
The Sun Never Sets On The British Welfare System
by Ann Coulter
08/10/2011
Those of you following the barbaric rioting in Britain will not have failed to notice that a sizable proportion of the thugs are white, something not often seen in this country.

Not only that, but in a triumph of feminism, a lot of them are girls. Even the "disabled" (according to the British benefits system) seem to have miraculously overcome their infirmities to dash out and steal a few TVs.

Congratulations, Britain! You've barbarized your citizenry, without regard to race, gender or physical handicap!

With a welfare system far more advanced than the United States, the British have achieved the remarkable result of turning entire communities of ancestral British people into tattooed, drunken brutes.

I guess we now have the proof of what conservatives have been saying since forever: Looting is a result of liberal welfare policies. And Britain is in the end stages of the welfare state.

In 2008, a 9-year-old British girl, Shannon Matthews, disappeared on her way home from a school trip. The media leapt on the case -- only to discover that Shannon was one of seven children her mother, Karen, had produced with five different men.

The first of these serial sperm-donors explained: "Karen just goes from one bloke to the next, uses them to have a kid, grabs all the child benefits and moves on."

Poor little Shannon eventually turned up at the home of one of her many step-uncles -- whose ex-wife, by the way, was the mother of six children with three different fathers.

(Is Father's Day celebrated in England? If so, how?)

The Daily Mail (London) traced the family's proud Anglo ancestry of stable families back hundreds of years. The Nazi war machine couldn't break the British, but the modern welfare state has.

A year earlier, in 2007, another product of the new order, Fiona MacKeown, took seven of her eight children (by five different fathers) and her then-boyfriend, on a drug-fueled, six-month vacation to the Indian island of Goa. The trip was paid for -- like everything else in her life -- with government benefits.

(When was the last time you had a free, six-month vacation? I'm drawing a blank, too.)

While in Goa, Fiona took her entourage on a side-trip, leaving her 15-year-old daughter, Scarlett Keeling, in the capable hands of a 25-year-old local whom Scarlett had begun sleeping with, perhaps hoping to get a head-start on her own government benefits. A few weeks later, Scarlett turned up dead, full of drugs, raped and murdered.

Scarlett's estranged stepfather later drank himself to death, while her brother Silas announced on his social networking page: "My name is Si, n I spend most my life either out wit mates get drunk or at partys, playing rugby or going to da beach (pretty s**t really)."

It's a wonder that someone like Silas, who has never worked, and belongs to a family in which no one has ever worked, can afford a cellphone for social networking. No, actually, it's not.

Britain has a far more redistributive welfare system than France, which is why France's crime problem is mostly a matter of Muslim immigrants, not French nationals. Meanwhile, England's welfare state is fast returning the native population to its violent 18th-century highwaymen roots.

Needless to say, Britain leads Europe in the proportion of single mothers and, as a consequence, also leads or co-leads the European Union in violent crime, alcohol and drug abuse, obesity and sexually transmitted diseases.

But liberal elites here and in Britain will blame anything but the welfare state they adore. They drone on about the strict British class system or the lack of jobs or the nation's history of racism.

None of that explains the sad lives of young Shannon Matthews and Scarlett Keeling, with their long English ancestry and perfect Anglo features.

Democrats would be delighted if violent mobs like those in Britain arose here -- perhaps in Wisconsin! That would allow them to introduce yet more government programs staffed by unionized public employees, as happened after the 1992 L.A. riots and the 1960s race riots, following the recommendations of the Kerner Commission.

MSNBC might even do the unthinkable and offer Al Sharpton his own TV show. (Excuse me -- someone's trying to get my attention ... WHAT?)

Inciting violent mobs is the essence of the left's agenda: Promote class warfare, illegitimate children and an utterly debased citizenry.

Like the British riot girls interviewed by the BBC, the Democrats tell us "all of this happened because of the rich people."

We're beginning to see the final result of that idea in Britain. The welfare state creates a society of beasts. Meanwhile, nonjudgmental elites don't dare condemn the animals their programs have created.

Rioters in England are burning century-old family businesses to the ground, stealing from injured children lying on the sidewalks and forcing Britons to strip to their underwear on the street.

I keep reading that it's because they don't have jobs -- which they're obviously anxious to hold. Or someone called them a "kaffir." Or their social services have been reduced. Or their Blackberries made them do it. Or they disapprove of a referee's call in a Manchester United game.

A few well-placed rifle rounds, and the rioting would end in an instant. A more sustained attack on the rampaging mob might save England from itself, finally removing shaved-head, drunken parasites from the benefits rolls that Britain can't find the will to abolish on moral or utilitarian grounds. We can be sure there's no danger of killing off the next Winston Churchill or Edmund Burke in these crowds.

But like Louis XVI, British authorities are paralyzed by their indifference to their own civilization. A half-century of berating themselves for the crime of being British has left them morally defenseless. They see nothing about England worth saving, certainly not worth fighting for -- which is fortunate since most of their cops don't have guns.

This is how civilizations die. It can happen overnight, as it did in Revolutionary France. If Britain of 1939 were composed of the current British population, the entirety of Europe would today be doing the "Heil Hitler" salute and singing the "Horst Wessel Song."

~~~

Ms. Coulter is a Political Commentator, she makes her beans doing this sort of thing and she always has an edge to her rhetoric and is decidedly partisan in her thoughts...so what, we all are.

The Fourth Day of turmoil in England, how much longer, will Troops be brought in?

Any Limeys care to contribute?

amicus
 
I would not be alone in questioning Ann Coulter’s analysis of England’s current turmoil. She’s a primo nut job. Any commentary from her bears no relationship to real life.
 
You, of course, speak for yourself, and your perspective, I know for certain, bears no resemblance to reality.

Now...what did my above and your previous, accomplish?

Nothing.

Thanks for it .

Amicus
 
Hands up, who would like Ann Coulter to take a six-month vacation?
 
You, of course, speak for yourself, and your perspective, I know for certain, bears no resemblance to reality.

Now...what did my above and your previous, accomplish?

Nothing.

Thanks for it .

Amicus
Among the 7 billion people on this planet, about 1.8 billion speak English as a first or second language. That puts the theoretical odds that some English speaker, somewhere on the planet, would understand this post at about 1.8 billion to 1.

No matter. I'm still betting against.
 
Last edited:
You, of course, speak for yourself, and your perspective, I know for certain, bears no resemblance to reality.
Now...what did my above and your previous, accomplish?

Nothing.

Thanks for it .

Amicus

Thank fuck my perception of reality and yours is at odds.
Your posts here espouse beliefs that are off the end of the conservative spectrum.

I'm beginning to suspect you post your shit here for fun, seriously man, I cant imagine that anyone actually thinks like this.
 
Thank fuck my perception of reality and yours is at odds.
Your posts here espouse beliefs that are off the end of the conservative spectrum.

I'm beginning to suspect you post your shit here for fun, seriously man, I cant imagine that anyone actually thinks like this.

Agreed. Amicus is a Karen Kraft-class attention whore, albeit with slightly less testosterone.
 
I've never heard of this rather smug commentator but she has a good general point. The welfare state has destroyed much of the British work ethic and self respect of people at the lower end of the social and economic spectrum.

Everybody needs a safety net in times of high unemployment but here it's a way of life for many people, which has also been compounded by scatterbrained liberal social policies for the last fifty years. Even Thatcher didn't have the will to reform this repugnant downward spiral which could've been avoided.

It's a shame because there are a lot of dynamic and talented people here and also many in the so called underclass involved in the riots who will never fulfil their potential. The handwringing lefties have messed up for the last fifty years so it's time someone else had a go, whether thats the EDL, BNP or whoever I don't really care anymore but the mainstream parties are purely self serving and not interested in true change.

In the meantime I hope the coppers use teargas, rubber bullets etc and if that fails then live ammo.
 
But that can't be right, according to Lit's righties, all the rioters are black. Someone's lying here, n'est ce pas?
 
I've never heard of this rather smug commentator but she has a good general point. The welfare state has destroyed much of the British work ethic and self respect of people at the lower end of the social and economic spectrum.

FINALLY, some admission of truth about the situation!

Ann Coulter is a brilliant, satirical writer whose Conservative viewpoints earn her immediate criticism from the left. (as illustrated in this thread)

Compare her credentials to theirs:
http://www.anncoulter.com/my_life.html
 
I would not be alone in questioning Ann Coulter’s analysis of England’s current turmoil. She’s a primo nut job. Any commentary from her bears no relationship to real life.

What facts do you have to counter her argument? The truth is tough medicine.
 
These clowns hate Coulter because she's a smart, strong independent woman who doesn't need white liberal men to help make her way in the world at a time when white liberal men think they are the essential element of arbitrating a fair and just affirmative-action society where women are deprecated and patronized, given positions only after they have learned to parrot the ideas of the white, liberal metrosexual male consensus about how women cannot make it in the world because of all the obstacles placed in their way by white conservatives like Ann Coulter...
 
Last edited:
More to substantiate Coulter's opinion piece:


Years of liberal dogma have spawned a generation of amoral, uneducated, welfare dependent, brutalised youngsters


"... The people who wrecked swathes of property, burned vehicles and terrorised communities have no moral compass to make them susceptible to guilt or shame.

Most have no jobs to go to or exams they might pass. They know no family role models, for most live in homes in which the father is unemployed, or from which he has decamped.

They are illiterate and innumerate, beyond maybe some dexterity with computer games and BlackBerries.

They are essentially wild beasts. I use that phrase advisedly, because it seems appropriate to young people bereft of the discipline that might make them employable; of the conscience that distinguishes between right and wrong.

They respond only to instinctive animal impulses — to eat and drink, have sex, seize or destroy the accessible property of others.

Their behaviour on the streets resembled that of the polar bear which attacked a Norwegian tourist camp last week. They were doing what came naturally and, unlike the bear, no one even shot them for it.

The depressing truth is that at the bottom of our society is a layer of young people with no skills, education, values or aspirations. They do not have what most of us would call ‘lives’: they simply exist.

Nobody has ever dared suggest to them that they need feel any allegiance to anything, least of all Britain or their community. They do not watch royal weddings or notice Test matches or take pride in being Londoners or Scousers or Brummies.

Not only do they know nothing of Britain’s past, they care nothing for its present.
They have their being only in video games and street-fights, casual drug use and crime, sometimes petty, sometimes serious.

The notions of doing a nine-to-five job, marrying and sticking with a wife and kids, taking up DIY or learning to read properly, are beyond their imaginations.

A key factor in delinquency is lack of effective sanctions to deter it. From an early stage, feral children discover that they can bully fellow pupils at school, shout abuse at people in the streets, urinate outside pubs, hurl litter from car windows, play car radios at deafening volumes, and, indeed, commit casual assaults with only a negligible prospect of facing rebuke, far less retribution.


So there we have it: a large, amoral, brutalised sub-culture of young British people who lack education because they have no will to learn, and skills which might make them employable. They are too idle to accept work waitressing or doing domestic labour, which is why almost all such jobs are filled by immigrants.

They have no code of values to dissuade them from behaving anti-socially or, indeed, criminally, and small chance of being punished if they do so.

They have no sense of responsibility for themselves, far less towards others, and look to no future beyond the next meal, sexual encounter or TV football game.

They are an absolute deadweight upon society, because they contribute nothing yet cost the taxpayer billions. Liberal opinion holds they are victims, because society has failed to provide them with opportunities to develop their potential.

They are products of a culture which gives them so much unconditionally that they are let off learning how to become human beings.
 
Back
Top