Brandon's Master Plan on Ukraine

Just goes to show that autocratic dictators like to be autocratic dictators. I doubt China believed Russia would invade as well.
 
Just goes to show that autocratic dictators like to be autocratic dictators. I doubt China believed Russia would invade as well.
The Chinese know that Joe's too fucking senile to think that deply into things. And after all, what's he gonna do about it but capitulate yet again?
 
Brilliant...Joey Meltbrain's strategy was to talk China into helping us muscle Putin into a peaceful posture re Ukraine. How'd that work out? Let'sgo to those right-wing fire-breathers at the NYT:

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/Screenshot%20(1610).png
Just goes to show you how unqualified these people are in guiding the foreign policy of the United States. I doubt the Chinese have stopped laughing since. Maybe we need to have AOC travel to China so that Xi can be made to realize his number one enemy is Climate Change.:rolleyes:
 
Give us your NY Times login so we can all see :cool:
Over three months, senior Biden administration officials held half a dozen urgent meetings with top Chinese officials in which the Americans presented intelligence showing Russia's troop buildup around Ukraine and beseeched the Chinese to tell Russia not to invade, according to U.S. officials.

Each time, the Chinese officials, including the foreign minister and the ambassador to the United States, rebuffed the Americans, saying they did not think an invasion was in the works. After one diplomatic exchange in December, U.S. officials got intelligence showing Beijing had shared the information with Moscow, telling the Russians that the United States was trying to sow discord -- and that China would not try to impede Russian plans and actions, the officials said.


The previously unreported talks between American and Chinese officials show how the Biden administration tried to use intelligence findings and diplomacy to persuade a superpower it views as a growing adversary to stop the invasion of Ukraine, and how that nation, led by President Xi Jinping, persistently sided with Russia even as the evidence of Moscow's plans for a military offensive grew over the winter.
 
\

He ain't got no stinkin' sources. Just a C&P from a paywall site with no backup.
Maybe I ginned up the NYT's rweet, too. Yeah, tht's the ticket.

It can't be that the world's dictators have taken the full measure of our senile Chief Executive and found him easy to befuddle and push around. No, never that.
 
Maybe I ginned up the NYT's rweet, too. Yeah, tht's the ticket.

It can't be that the world's dictators have taken the full measure of our senile Chief Executive and found him easy to befuddle and push around. No, never that.
No sources = no story but your partisan poutrage is noted, you illiterate dumbfuck.
 
No sources = no story but your partisan poutrage is noted, you illiterate dumbfuck.
I linked to the NYT article, then excerpted it, bright boy.

This is the desiccated, dementia-ridden imbecile you and your pals have saddled the nation with. Now he's reduced to begging communist tyrants for an indugence. Pathetic.
 
I linked to the NYT article, then excerpted it, bright boy.

This is the desiccated, dementia-ridden imbecile you and your pals have saddled the nation with. Now he's reduced to begging communist tyrants for an indugence. Pathetic.
Your linked article has no sources and asking China to help with Ukraine isn't begging for anything, you histrionic retard.
 
Your linked article has no sources and asking China to help with Ukraine isn't begging for anything, you histrionic retard.
"This account is based on interviews with senior administration officials with knowledge of the conversations who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the diplomacy."

Those are the same sources that you were perftly fine with when they announced that Trump was a Putin puppet. What changed?
 
"This account is based on interviews with senior administration officials with knowledge of the conversations who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the diplomacy."

Those are the same sources that you were perftly fine with when they announced that Trump was a Putin puppet. What changed?
Nothing changed. 45 is a Putin puppet and proved it by calling him a genius for invading Ukraine. Still no sources? That really just makes you and the NYT liars.
 
So what? It was worth a shot. Would have been meaningful on a couple of fronts if China had frowned upon Russia invading Ukraine.
 
Nothing changed. 45 is a Putin puppet and proved it by calling him a genius for invading Ukraine. Still no sources? That really just makes you and the NYT liars.
I'll let you take that up with the NYT. I cite my source, and it's one you port -siders loe when they said things you liked, so fuck you.
 
Putin has yet to take a major city in Ukraine. He's taking some good sized losses.
 

NATO Response Force deploys for first time

Oriana Gonzalez

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced Friday that the alliance has activated elements of the 40,000-troop NATO Response Force (NRF) for the first time, warning at a press conference: "The Kremlin's objectives are not limited to Ukraine."

Why it matters: Stoltenberg has called Russia's invasion of Ukraine "the most serious security crisis we have faced in Europe for decades." The NRF will deploy "on land, at sea, and in the air" in eastern Europe for the purposes of collective defense.

Details: The secretary general said that the size of the NRF has tripled since 2014, but that not all forces would be deployed. He also said that NATO countries would be providing additional weapons and air-defense systems to Ukraine at the request of its government.

What he's saying: "We are deploying [the NRF] to ... prevent any miscalculations, any misunderstandings that we are not ready to protect and defend all our allies," Stoltenberg said. "This is something that all allies have agreed to do."

More here: https://www.axios.com/nato-kremlin-...ine-0872be5e-b5e0-486b-b356-2985370e5148.html
https://www.axios.com/authors/ogonzalez/
 

NATO Response Force deploys for first time

Oriana Gonzalez

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced Friday that the alliance has activated elements of the 40,000-troop NATO Response Force (NRF) for the first time, warning at a press conference: "The Kremlin's objectives are not limited to Ukraine."
What other objectives would they have, in a military sense?
 
Back
Top