Bobo Chadrone and/or Wat Tyler, This Is Your Time To Shine.....

RobDownSouth

BoycotDivestSanctio
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
78,398
Yesterday I posted a semi-tongue-in-cheek about what conspiracy theorists are saying about Charlie Kirk's timely death
Conspiracy-minded MAGA going apeshit from antisemite* Candace Owen's accusations that genocidal Israel was the prime force behind Charlie Kirk's death.

Saw a video on Instagram yesterday "proving" Kirk was killed by a booby trapped lavalier microphone attached to his shirt collar (genocidal Israel takes great pride in booby trapping electronics, don'tcha know).

Video shows some shady guy about five yards away from Kirk appear to "press a keyfob" of sorts, then the microphone (on Kirk's left side of his body) detonates at an upward rightward path right through his carotid artery, jugular vein and the three major nerves that control breathing. "Textbook surgical strike" (literally).

Once Kirk slumps to the ground, the spent "microphone" drops to the table in front of him. "Keyfob man" joins a rush of folks attempting to aid Kirk, leaping over the front of the table towards Kirk's prone body, and deftly sweeping up the microphone and stuffing it into his pocket.

Oh and other "proof"....Kirk's buddy, the Russian asset Tucker Carlson said that he had planned to make an appearance on Kirk's podcast soon and Kirk made a baffling request, urging Carlson to "bring up Israel's Mossad" on the show. Carlson claimed this seemed strange to him

It's a conspiracy! :D

* Candace Owens is a true antisemite by the historical interpretation of the word, not this neo-definition of "Antisemitism is someone who hurts Jewish feelings"

Well instead of being stuffed down the rabbit hole, we're seeing additional commentary from bolt-action rifle enthusiasts. Some of it seems a tad speculative to me, so I thought either one of you can shed some light on what a 30-06 bolt action rifle can and cannot do....

First, these gun guys showed that you cannot easily dissemble a Mauser 98 relic (which is the current "fact" being touted by Kash Patel's FBI) and you damn sure cannot store the pieces in a small backpack that the alleged shooter wore.

Secondly, multiple people are claiming that a headshot at 150 yards on a human head would make it explode.....and even a shot to the neck, which supposedly killed Charlie, had enough kinetic force to decapitate him....and yet his head stayed connected to his body?

Thirdly, the exit wound from a 30-06 round would have left a tremendous blood splatter on the white backdrop behind Charlie. There was no blood splatter to be seen in any video.

Finally, the slug from a 30-06 bullet is fairly large and should have easily been located by investigators at the scene. To date, no bullet has been found so no ballistic tests can be performed.

So Wat and/or Bobo or any of you other cosplay Airborne Ranger Force Recon snipers that infest this board.....which of the above statements are true and which are false?

I'm starting to think that perhaps this "lavalier microphone booby trapped by Israelis" theory might not be as outlandish as first thought!
 
Yesterday I posted a semi-tongue-in-cheek about what conspiracy theorists are saying about Charlie Kirk's timely death


Well instead of being stuffed down the rabbit hole, we're seeing additional commentary from bolt-action rifle enthusiasts. Some of it seems a tad speculative to me, so I thought either one of you can shed some light on what a 30-06 bolt action rifle can and cannot do....

First, these gun guys showed that you cannot easily dissemble a Mauser 98 relic (which is the current "fact" being touted by Kash Patel's FBI) and you damn sure cannot store the pieces in a small backpack that the alleged shooter wore.

Secondly, multiple people are claiming that a headshot at 150 yards on a human head would make it explode.....and even a shot to the neck, which supposedly killed Charlie, had enough kinetic force to decapitate him....and yet his head stayed connected to his body?

Thirdly, the exit wound from a 30-06 round would have left a tremendous blood splatter on the white backdrop behind Charlie. There was no blood splatter to be seen in any video.

Finally, the slug from a 30-06 bullet is fairly large and should have easily been located by investigators at the scene. To date, no bullet has been found so no ballistic tests can be performed.

So Wat and/or Bobo or any of you other cosplay Airborne Ranger Force Recon snipers that infest this board.....which of the above statements are true and which are false?

I'm starting to think that perhaps this "lavalier microphone booby trapped by Israelis" theory might not be as outlandish as first thought!
Stop. Don't get sucked into it. The M1 used by Americans in WWII had similar ballistics. Not every Nazi had their heads shot off during WWII.
 
Back
Top