Bill Clinton urges woman to prostitute herself!

JackLuis

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
21,881
What are you talking about, Jack? I know I'm missing something.
 
I was just saying that leading her into the moral cesspit of the Senate is leading her astray.
That she will have to choose what is right or what the party tells her is right, kind of like Rubio, who has to say the craziest crap because he's ambitious.
Okay so I'd like to see Mitch hung out, like a sun dried possum on a woodshed.

Probably why I don't have my own comedy show, huh?

:rose::rose:
 
Last edited:
I was just saying that leading her into the moral cesspit of the Senate is leading her astray.

Okay so I'd like to see Mitch hung out, like a sun dried possum on a woodshed.

Probably why I don't have my own comedy show, huh?

:rose::rose:

Sorry, I missed your second link. Clinton is a natural born schmoozer and pol. He will never leave politics. I used to work for someone on the right who had met him..He hated Clinton. Kind of funny as this guy was a jerk himself. Thought he was morally superior. :rolleyes:
 
Sorry, I missed your second link. Clinton is a natural born schmoozer and pol. He will never leave politics. I used to work for someone on the right who had met him..He hated Clinton. Kind of funny as this guy was a jerk himself. Thought he was morally superior. :rolleyes:

Clinton, your old boss. or both? :D
 
I wonder what Cathy O Brien makes of this non-story...
 
Algebra time.

The definition of a virgin in Kentucky is an ugly "X" old and one that can run faster than her brothers at that.

You can guess at what X equals.
 
In other words Clinton thinks Judd is a dud.

Probably he's worried that Judd wouldn't adhere to the Party Line. She might even think for herself!

But a new woman, already a pol, would 'get' the need to support Wall Street and the Bankers and not start talking about the stupidity and hubris of 'saving' Afghanistan for the Afghan's.
 
In other words Clinton thinks Judd is a dud.

He's probably thinking the obvious. Find a candidate with real political experience who can actually beat the crap out of McConnel at the polls.
 
...instead of a barking moon bat broken to the goose step in Hollywood.

Vette, dearest caveman, she couldn't be much worse than McConnell or any other of the loudmouth tea party dingbat legislators and candidates. At least Judd actually knows what rape is as well as what it's like.

The problem is, when she thinks for herself, she scares people.:D

Any female candidate scares people, into insanity. Kind of funny though. These days the GOP runneth over with scary people and candidates.
 
She's a liberal, she isn't a strong woman, she's weak. She believes that everyone else is weak too, and cannot exist without the heavy apparatus of government "rogering" the civil society. To me, the choice between Mitch and Bitch is quite clear, as it is to a growing number of Democrats as well.:D

How clever you are with words V-man. "Mitch or the Bitch," are your writing Republican talking points now? That will make a great billboard, but you'd better have a PAC claim it, because you wouldn't want to have Mitch sullying his reputation with the phrase.

Which she are you talking about Judd or the redhead? I kind of got lost in the magic of your phraseology.
 
He's probably thinking the obvious. Find a candidate with real political experience who can actually beat the crap out of McConnel at the polls.
We're talking about Kentucky here. Isn't that a long shot at best? He's not gonna Todd Aiken his campaign.
 
As sad as that is, just how does that distinction qualify her for the United States Senate?

You tell me, Vette. Akins, Murdoch et al have proven themselves to be morons who didn't get reelected because of their lack of knowledge about women, vaginas and rape. Apparently, voters thought these men knew jack about these subjects or about the job they were elected to do.

Regarding Judd being a Hollywood actress, she would not be the first person with a Hollywood background to go into politics. Shirley Temple Black, Clint Eastwood, Sonny Bono, Al Franken and last but not least Ronald Reagan all did, or are doing in Franken's case, a credible job in their political roles. So to use Hollywood as a negative qualifier amounts to a hill of beans.

Got to go. Later.
 
We're talking about Kentucky here. Isn't that a long shot at best? He's not gonna Todd Aiken his campaign.


Who knows in politics? Anything is possible and it's the possibility that is apparently bothering people.
 
when Clint Eastwood, Chuck Norris, or Bruce Willis speak for the right... the right wing plops them all over the board as great and noble examples

when a celebrity on the left does the same... suddenly they're weak and just stupid celebrities


the best part is, they dont even notice their own hypocrisy
 
Back
Top