Bill Clinton and Al Gore KILLED Princess Di!

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
Ten Years Ago, Lady Di Washed Away Clinton-Gore Fundraising Dirt

As the networks dwell on the tenth anniversary of the death of a troubled British princess this week, it might be worth remembering that at the time, we noticed the tabloid tendencies toward celebrity deaths at the time were a much bigger media trend than investigations into the scandalous fundraising tactics the Clinton-Gore team used in 1996. Our MediaWatch study at the time noted:

MediaWatch analysts examined fundraising scandal stories in August and September on the Big Three morning shows and evening shows, plus CNN's The World Today. The networks broadcast 686 stories on Diana between August 31 and the end of September compared to just 113 stories about the fundraising scandal. That's a ratio of more than 6 to 1. Isolating the morning shows, collectively they aired 407 stories on Princess Diana's death, while devoting just 36 to the scandal. That's an astonishing ratio of 10 to 1.

...Like most other months this year, most networks skipped fundraising stories on a majority of their broadcasts. In September's 30 days, with the Thompson hearings in their most dramatic stage, the morning shows were all guilty (CBS 28 days with no story, NBC 24, ABC 22). In the evening, CBS, ABC (both 20 nights off) and NBC (19) took more than half the month off, while only CNN (12) didn't.


In the August issue, MediaWatch had noted how compelling details of the Senate fundraising hearings in July were buried by the media frenzy over the Miami murder of fashion designer Gianni Versace, with a Versace-to-hearings ratio of 7 to 1 on the network morning shows.

This should be required reading for those of you who don't remember the Huang-Chung scandals.
 
And what have we today?

It seems this same felon is giving huge cash amounts to Hillary ClitBitch and it all comes out

So the PRESS makes up some BULLSHIT story about Larry Craig to DIVERT ATTENTION

AGAIN


10 years

Clinton scandals still!
 
And the DIVERSION is WORKING

Our Watchdog Media At Work - Craig Vs. Hsu

A search on Google News for "Larry Craig" returns 5,482 articles, mostly from the brand name mainstream news media:




Larry Craig is alleged to have made improper advances in a public bathroom. (An activity our media usually uphold as a "civil right.")

He will resign his Senate office today in disgrace.

The actual incident happened three months ago. Mr. Craig is a Senator that most people have never heard of before.

Meanwhile, a search on Google News for "Norman Hsu" returns 437 articles, and many of them are from "blogs":





Norman Hsu is alleged to have violated our campaign finance laws by funneling millions of dollars into the coffers of the Democrat party over the last three years.
(Laws our media usually deem "sacrosanct.")

The money involved is very possibly from the Communist Chinese government. Hsu has been on the lam from a three year prison sentence for 15 years for stealing a million dollars.

The story involves the Democrat’s current presumptive Presidential nominee, their last Presidential nominee, and many of its best known candidates.

Moreover, the DNC and the Clintons both have had well documented problems in the past with corrupt contributors, and even several with Communist Chinese connections.

So which story would you think has more significance for the republic in the long term?

But perhaps there is some other criteria at work in the media’s decision as to what is important news.
 
busybody said:
And the DIVERSION is WORKING


Good. Just like the Monika Lewinski diversion threw you republicans off the trail of Bill killing 19 people while in office. Whew!

:D
 
People will fall for anything as long as you tell them often enough.

To this day people still think we paid 2000 dollars for toilet seats and 900 dollars for hammers.

As if.
 
Why did it MAKE news NOW?

When it happened MONTHS ago

if not to TAKE the GLARE off of ANOTHER ClitBitch scandal?

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
busybody said:
Why did it MAKE news NOW?

When it happened MONTHS ago

if not to TAKE the GLARE off of ANOTHER ClitBitch scandal?

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

He was arrested in June, not MONTHS ago..
He did not disclose the arrest until 77 days later, when the story went public.

The Idaho Statesman was frank in calling for his resignation.

"We cannot abide an elected official who didn't disclose a lewd conduct arrest until the story broke 77 days later -- a lie by omission and a violation of the public trust," the Statesman said in an editorial published in Thursday's editions. "We cannot afford ... to have a senator who merely provides fodder for bloggers and late-night talk show hosts."
 
busybody said:
Larry Craig is alleged to have made improper advances in a public bathroom. (An activity our media usually uphold as a "civil right.")

If it was an alleged incident as you are incoherently shrieking, then how come Craig signed the papers which said that he indeed was guilty of attempted solicitation. there ain't no alleged about it.

busybody said:
He will resign his Senate office today in disgrace.
As he should. you on the other hand probably expected him to be paraded about the fucking grounds of the Capitol on the shoulders of his fellow Republicans

busybody said:
The actual incident happened three months ago. Mr. Craig is a Senator that most people have never heard of before.

So either it was an alleged incident, as you shrieked in the first quoted bit, or it actually happened as you claim in the last quoted bit. You can't have it both ways, which is it?

Actually, who fucking cares? The more important question is how many niggers did you brutally torture and then lynch this week? Are you over 200 murdered niggers for the year yet?
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
He was arrested in June, not MONTHS ago..
He did not disclose the arrest until 77 days later, when the story went public.

The Idaho Statesman was frank in calling for his resignation.

"We cannot abide an elected official who didn't disclose a lewd conduct arrest until the story broke 77 days later -- a lie by omission and a violation of the public trust," the Statesman said in an editorial published in Thursday's editions. "We cannot afford ... to have a senator who merely provides fodder for bloggers and late-night talk show hosts."
77 days ago

and the press reported it NOW

once again to DIVERT attention from a ClitBitch ELECTION FRAUD

just like the M Foley story

which was known for a year or so but the press put it out right before th election
 
I contend that Clitman and Algore KILLED Di to divert attention

and that Craig was set up by the vast LEFT WING IDIOCY!
 
its a good thing the PRESS LIES and MANIPULATES for the DUMZ

or they would never be able to even get 30% in any erection :cool:
 
best freakin thread on LIT and its languishing!

GRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
God! If I didn't know there was a whole section of America that thinks just like you, You'd be funny as hell.



Comshaw
 
Back
Top