Biden’s Team Deliberately Kneecapped Trump’s Security

[ChloeTzang]

Biden’s Team Deliberately Kneecapped Trump’s Security To Allow An Assassination Attempt​

They kept the rooftop open, watched the shooter, kept Trump on the stage, and didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot. And we’re supposed to believe it was an innocent oopsie?

Nobody wants to hear this because of the implications, but oh well, because it needs to be said: Joe Biden’s security regime deliberately and with malice aforethought created the conditions that led to an attempted assassin shooting Donald Trump in the head. It is by the grace of God that he lived and our nation is not currently in the midst of a violent civil war. They deliberately starved Trump’s security team of the resources it needed. And they did it repeatedly, over many weeks and months.

With Trump’s security detail understaffed, under-resourced, and stretched to its limits, Biden’s security regime reportedly diverted even more resources to a hastily planned Jill Biden event that just happened to be in the area. Biden’s security regime then ordered the most obvious assassination perch in the entire area to remain outside the main security perimeter. Furthermore, Biden’s Secret Service director ordered law enforcement and counter-snipers OFF the roof the assassin used. If that weren’t enough, Biden’s security regime also refused to block the line of sight from the assassin’s perch to Trump’s location. When law enforcement radioed in a suspicious person using a laser range finder at the building and even took photos of him, nothing was done to detain the assassin.

The assassin was so obviously a threat that bystanders at the event begged law enforcement to stop him, but nothing happened. And even as snipers on the roof near Trump saw a gunman on the other roof, Biden’s security regime refused to have agents immediately surround Trump or remove him from the stage to protect him from being shot.

Given the lies and nonsense from both Biden’s Department of Homeland Security secretary and his Secret Service director, it’s increasingly difficult to believe this was just a series of independent mistakes (Secret Service director Kim Cheatle at one point this week claimed snipers couldn’t be on the roof because it was sloped and they might fall and hurt themselves). In contrast, when you look at the entire picture, what you see better resembles a deliberate plan to make Trump vulnerable but to appear at first glance to be just a couple of innocent mistakes. And when you add in how little information we’ve been given about the shooter — apparently the only person on Earth not on the internet — you begin to wonder if maybe a group of people at a different three-letter agency might have been working on a parallel track to find and encourage people to take action against Trump at the very same time he was kept vulnerable by Biden’s regime.

We know this happens because the FBI did it with Gretchen Whitmer: It recruited and urged disturbed individuals to buy weapons and put together a plan to kidnap her. In that case, the FBI wanted a story it could use to slime right-wingers. So it created the story itself. What happens when an agency like that, or maybe even another three-letter agency, decides instead that it’s had enough of Trump? Some former FBI employees might even call it an “insurance policy.” So who was the shooter talking to in the hours, days, and weeks ahead of the event? Who was he meeting with? Did anyone suggest or nudge or urge him to go to the Trump rally in Butler? Did anyone suggest or point out to him the building he eventually used? Was he told at any time not to worry about security?

The FBI told us almost immediately that while it couldn’t open the assassin’s phone, it knew he acted alone. That’s kind of strange, when you think about it. They told us almost immediately that they identified him by DNA, despite him having no criminal record. They also said they found explosives in his car. Why didn’t they just identify him by his plates or registration or next of kin? That’s pretty weird, too. At some point, you just have to say enough with the lies. We saw what they did with the Russia hoax. We saw the Kavanaugh hoax. We saw the Covid origin hoax. We saw the Ukraine hoax, the stolen election, the J6 op, and then the armed Mar-a-Lago raid and the myriad illegal cases against Trump.

They called him Hitler. They said he was an existential threat. They said he would destroy democracy. They said he was the most dangerous person on Earth. Then they denied him security. They kept the rooftop open. They watched the shooter and did nothing. They kept Trump on that stage. And they didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot in the head.

And we’re all supposed to believe it was just an innocent oopsie?

And now look at what the MSM is doing. The bastards are taking one of the most significant events in American history since the assassination of JFK and memory holing it. We really cannot hate the MSM nearly enough.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/1...s-security-to-allow-an-assassination-attempt/

 

[dmallord]

That must have been some tall soapbox you were standing on, Chloe. I haven't combed your rant, but my guess is that you come close to one of Trump's record-telling lie sessions in your rambling. It's a good thing it wasn't an hour and thirty-two minutes.

 

[LeeKee]

Its like pick up lines at a club. People know they are being told lies. They just choose the one they are most comfortable with and go with it. Except with politics, somehow, still knowing it's bullshit, they will wish others dead to defend their decisions.
Talk about fuckin tribalism.
Fuckin odd "adult" behavior.
I say again, we are all being lied to. Admit it.

 

[Bray123]

The felon sex abuser was shot at by a domestic terrorist with an AR-15 whilst he was whining about those nasty immigrants being dangerous terrorists.

AR-15s keep you safe.

 

[ChloeTzang]

That must have been some tall soapbox you were standing on, Chloe. I haven't combed your rant, but my guess is that you come close to one of Trump's record-telling lie sessions in your rambling. It's a good thing it wasn't an hour and thirty-two minutes.

Admit it. You enjoy the little rants.....

 

[Bray123]

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...trump-security-denied-fact-check/74410817007/

Rated: FALSE.
The DHS did not cut the felon's security team.

TheFederalist rated as unflinching Right-Wing bias by AllSidesdotcom.

 

[ll74]

Bullshit thread is bullshit

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Blaming Biden is retarded, even for a big trumptard like chrowy. I thought chinks were supposed to be intelligent?

 

[Chernosoth]

Plain incompetence looks more likely. We have plenty of that in government.

Either way, Secret Service credibility is shot to hell.

 

[Chobham]

Bullshit thread is bullshit

No, it isn't.

 

[ll74]

No, it isn't.

It is.

 

[LLCox]

Biden’s Team Deliberately Kneecapped Trump’s Security To Allow An Assassination Attempt​

They kept the rooftop open, watched the shooter, kept Trump on the stage, and didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot. And we’re supposed to believe it was an innocent oopsie?

Nobody wants to hear this because of the implications, but oh well, because it needs to be said: Joe Biden’s security regime deliberately and with malice aforethought created the conditions that led to an attempted assassin shooting Donald Trump in the head. It is by the grace of God that he lived and our nation is not currently in the midst of a violent civil war. They deliberately starved Trump’s security team of the resources it needed. And they did it repeatedly, over many weeks and months.

With Trump’s security detail understaffed, under-resourced, and stretched to its limits, Biden’s security regime reportedly diverted even more resources to a hastily planned Jill Biden event that just happened to be in the area. Biden’s security regime then ordered the most obvious assassination perch in the entire area to remain outside the main security perimeter. Furthermore, Biden’s Secret Service director ordered law enforcement and counter-snipers OFF the roof the assassin used. If that weren’t enough, Biden’s security regime also refused to block the line of sight from the assassin’s perch to Trump’s location. When law enforcement radioed in a suspicious person using a laser range finder at the building and even took photos of him, nothing was done to detain the assassin.

The assassin was so obviously a threat that bystanders at the event begged law enforcement to stop him, but nothing happened. And even as snipers on the roof near Trump saw a gunman on the other roof, Biden’s security regime refused to have agents immediately surround Trump or remove him from the stage to protect him from being shot.

Given the lies and nonsense from both Biden’s Department of Homeland Security secretary and his Secret Service director, it’s increasingly difficult to believe this was just a series of independent mistakes (Secret Service director Kim Cheatle at one point this week claimed snipers couldn’t be on the roof because it was sloped and they might fall and hurt themselves). In contrast, when you look at the entire picture, what you see better resembles a deliberate plan to make Trump vulnerable but to appear at first glance to be just a couple of innocent mistakes. And when you add in how little information we’ve been given about the shooter — apparently the only person on Earth not on the internet — you begin to wonder if maybe a group of people at a different three-letter agency might have been working on a parallel track to find and encourage people to take action against Trump at the very same time he was kept vulnerable by Biden’s regime.

We know this happens because the FBI did it with Gretchen Whitmer: It recruited and urged disturbed individuals to buy weapons and put together a plan to kidnap her. In that case, the FBI wanted a story it could use to slime right-wingers. So it created the story itself. What happens when an agency like that, or maybe even another three-letter agency, decides instead that it’s had enough of Trump? Some former FBI employees might even call it an “insurance policy.” So who was the shooter talking to in the hours, days, and weeks ahead of the event? Who was he meeting with? Did anyone suggest or nudge or urge him to go to the Trump rally in Butler? Did anyone suggest or point out to him the building he eventually used? Was he told at any time not to worry about security?

The FBI told us almost immediately that while it couldn’t open the assassin’s phone, it knew he acted alone. That’s kind of strange, when you think about it. They told us almost immediately that they identified him by DNA, despite him having no criminal record. They also said they found explosives in his car. Why didn’t they just identify him by his plates or registration or next of kin? That’s pretty weird, too. At some point, you just have to say enough with the lies. We saw what they did with the Russia hoax. We saw the Kavanaugh hoax. We saw the Covid origin hoax. We saw the Ukraine hoax, the stolen election, the J6 op, and then the armed Mar-a-Lago raid and the myriad illegal cases against Trump.

They called him Hitler. They said he was an existential threat. They said he would destroy democracy. They said he was the most dangerous person on Earth. Then they denied him security. They kept the rooftop open. They watched the shooter and did nothing. They kept Trump on that stage. And they didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot in the head.

And we’re all supposed to believe it was just an innocent oopsie?

And now look at what the MSM is doing. The bastards are taking one of the most significant events in American history since the assassination of JFK and memory holing it. We really cannot hate the MSM nearly enough.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/1...s-security-to-allow-an-assassination-attempt/
View attachment 2367367

Do you feel better now...

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Biden’s Team Deliberately Kneecapped Trump’s Security To Allow An Assassination Attempt​

They kept the rooftop open, watched the shooter, kept Trump on the stage, and didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot. And we’re supposed to believe it was an innocent oopsie?

Nobody wants to hear this because of the implications, but oh well, because it needs to be said: Joe Biden’s security regime deliberately and with malice aforethought created the conditions that led to an attempted assassin shooting Donald Trump in the head. It is by the grace of God that he lived and our nation is not currently in the midst of a violent civil war. They deliberately starved Trump’s security team of the resources it needed. And they did it repeatedly, over many weeks and months.

With Trump’s security detail understaffed, under-resourced, and stretched to its limits, Biden’s security regime reportedly diverted even more resources to a hastily planned Jill Biden event that just happened to be in the area. Biden’s security regime then ordered the most obvious assassination perch in the entire area to remain outside the main security perimeter. Furthermore, Biden’s Secret Service director ordered law enforcement and counter-snipers OFF the roof the assassin used. If that weren’t enough, Biden’s security regime also refused to block the line of sight from the assassin’s perch to Trump’s location. When law enforcement radioed in a suspicious person using a laser range finder at the building and even took photos of him, nothing was done to detain the assassin.

The assassin was so obviously a threat that bystanders at the event begged law enforcement to stop him, but nothing happened. And even as snipers on the roof near Trump saw a gunman on the other roof, Biden’s security regime refused to have agents immediately surround Trump or remove him from the stage to protect him from being shot.

Given the lies and nonsense from both Biden’s Department of Homeland Security secretary and his Secret Service director, it’s increasingly difficult to believe this was just a series of independent mistakes (Secret Service director Kim Cheatle at one point this week claimed snipers couldn’t be on the roof because it was sloped and they might fall and hurt themselves). In contrast, when you look at the entire picture, what you see better resembles a deliberate plan to make Trump vulnerable but to appear at first glance to be just a couple of innocent mistakes. And when you add in how little information we’ve been given about the shooter — apparently the only person on Earth not on the internet — you begin to wonder if maybe a group of people at a different three-letter agency might have been working on a parallel track to find and encourage people to take action against Trump at the very same time he was kept vulnerable by Biden’s regime.

We know this happens because the FBI did it with Gretchen Whitmer: It recruited and urged disturbed individuals to buy weapons and put together a plan to kidnap her. In that case, the FBI wanted a story it could use to slime right-wingers. So it created the story itself. What happens when an agency like that, or maybe even another three-letter agency, decides instead that it’s had enough of Trump? Some former FBI employees might even call it an “insurance policy.” So who was the shooter talking to in the hours, days, and weeks ahead of the event? Who was he meeting with? Did anyone suggest or nudge or urge him to go to the Trump rally in Butler? Did anyone suggest or point out to him the building he eventually used? Was he told at any time not to worry about security?

The FBI told us almost immediately that while it couldn’t open the assassin’s phone, it knew he acted alone. That’s kind of strange, when you think about it. They told us almost immediately that they identified him by DNA, despite him having no criminal record. They also said they found explosives in his car. Why didn’t they just identify him by his plates or registration or next of kin? That’s pretty weird, too. At some point, you just have to say enough with the lies. We saw what they did with the Russia hoax. We saw the Kavanaugh hoax. We saw the Covid origin hoax. We saw the Ukraine hoax, the stolen election, the J6 op, and then the armed Mar-a-Lago raid and the myriad illegal cases against Trump.

They called him Hitler. They said he was an existential threat. They said he would destroy democracy. They said he was the most dangerous person on Earth. Then they denied him security. They kept the rooftop open. They watched the shooter and did nothing. They kept Trump on that stage. And they didn’t do a damn thing until after he had been shot in the head.

And we’re all supposed to believe it was just an innocent oopsie?

And now look at what the MSM is doing. The bastards are taking one of the most significant events in American history since the assassination of JFK and memory holing it. We really cannot hate the MSM nearly enough.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/1...s-security-to-allow-an-assassination-attempt/
View attachment 2367367

Let me rephrase what you said:

 

[Rightguide]

That must have been some tall soapbox you were standing on, Chloe. I haven't combed your rant, but my guess is that you come close to one of Trump's record-telling lie sessions in your rambling. It's a good thing it wasn't an hour and thirty-two minutes.

So why don't you do so and itemize her points you think are false? Why guess?

 

[Rightguide]

Let's ask a simple defining question: At what point does a list of deviations from protocol suggest a planned outcome?

We can look at pattern and consistency: We can determine if the deviations are consistent and form a clear pattern, rather than being random or isolated incidents. This consistency can indicate intentional actions rather than accidental or sporadic mistakes.

We can look at repetition: If the same deviations occur repeatedly in similar contexts, it might suggest a deliberate approach rather than a series of coincidental errors.

We can examine beneficial outcomes: Do the deviations consistently benefit a particular party, or lead to a specific advantageous result, implying that the deviations are not merely mistakes but part of a strategy?

We can study timing and coordination: Do the deviations occur at critical moments that align with achieving a specific goal, indicating careful timing and coordination rather than spontaneous actions?

We can see if there is a lack of justifiable explanation: If there are no reasonable explanations for the deviations based on standard operating procedures, circumstances, or necessity, we can suggest that they were not caused by necessity or oversight but by design.

We can study communication evidence: We can see if there is documented communication or behavior that supports the idea that the deviations were discussed, planned, or encouraged by individuals or groups.

When these factors are present, it becomes more likely that a list of deviations from protocol suggests a planned outcome rather than a series of unintentional errors.

I thin the above approach offers the most practical and methodical path to a reasonable conclusion as to whether or not this event could have been planned.

 

[ll74]

Let's ask a simple defining question: At what point does a list of deviations from protocol suggest a planned outcome?

We can look at pattern and consistency: We can determine if the deviations are consistent and form a clear pattern, rather than being random or isolated incidents. This consistency can indicate intentional actions rather than accidental or sporadic mistakes.

We can look at repetition: If the same deviations occur repeatedly in similar contexts, it might suggest a deliberate approach rather than a series of coincidental errors.

We can examine beneficial outcomes: Do the deviations consistently benefit a particular party, or lead to a specific advantageous result, implying that the deviations are not merely mistakes but part of a strategy?

We can study timing and coordination: Do the deviations occur at critical moments that align with achieving a specific goal, indicating careful timing and coordination rather than spontaneous actions?

We can see if there is a lack of justifiable explanation: If there are no reasonable explanations for the deviations based on standard operating procedures, circumstances, or necessity, we can suggest that they were not caused by necessity or oversight but by design.

We can study communication evidence: We can see if there is documented communication or behavior that supports the idea that the deviations were discussed, planned, or encouraged by individuals or groups.

When these factors are present, it becomes more likely that a list of deviations from protocol suggests a planned outcome rather than a series of unintentional errors.

I thin the above approach offers the most practical and methodical path to a reasonable conclusion as to whether or not this event could have been planned.

When you start with bias, new information doesn't matter.

There's no evidence that it was an inside job. There is evidence of incompetence and derelict of duty.

If you want to be objective, then your conclusions should be derived from evidence rather than from bias.

 

[Rightguide]

When you start with bias, new information doesn't matter.

There's no evidence that it was an inside job. There is evidence of incompetence and derelict of duty.

If you want to be objective, then your conclusions should be derived from evidence rather than from bias.

Shut up! You haven't seen all of the "evidence" yet. There is a developing mountain of "incompetence, derelict of duty," questionable coincidence, and timing, some of which former agents are saying there is no excuse for. If your mind is made up, fine, take a nap and let others do the hard work of getting to the bottom of this.

 

[ll74]

Shut up! You haven't seen all of the "evidence" yet. There is a developing mountain of "incompetence, derelict of duty," questionable coincidence, and timing, some of which former agents are saying there is no excuse for. If your mind is made up, fine, take a nap and let others do the hard work of getting to the bottom of this.

Neither one of us has seen all the evidence yet.

Thanks for the confirmation.

You're hearing reports of things from random sources and your bias fills in the blanks.

I'm not the one who needs to shut up.

I haven't conclusively decided anything, you have...I have told you what we have evidence of currently.

 

[Rightguide]

Nine SS failures:

1. The rooftop that Crooks fired at Trump from was an obvious security risk.

2. Secret Service allowed local law enforcement to be placed inside the building instead of on the rooftop.

3. There was a lack of security of the building on the ground, allowing Crooks to access the rooftop.

4. Local law enforcement first spotted Crooks near a magnetometer with a range finder around 3 p.m. — about three hours before Trump spoke — but then was lost track of.

5. Despite local law enforcement officers reportedly spotting Crooks about an hour before Trump was to speak — hanging around outside the building, and then seen scoping the rooftop, returning with a backpack and pulling out a range finder — and reporting him to a command center, he was not stopped and questioned.

6. Secret Service reportedly spotted Crooks at 5:52 p.m. on the rooftop — about 20 minutes before Trump took the stage — but did not stop Trump from taking the stage.

7. Despite Crooks pulling out his weapon and getting into position to shoot Trump, Secret Service snipers did not do anything before he fired at Trump.

8. Trump took the stage at 6:02 p.m., but nothing was done to get him off the stage for 10 minutes, until Crooks was able to fire at him at 6:12 p.m.

9. There was no drone surveillance of the rally that could have alerted law enforcement to Crooks climbing to the rooftop sooner.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...er-president-donald-trump-being-assassinated/

 

[Rightguide]

When you start with bias, new information doesn't matter.

There's no evidence that it was an inside job. There is evidence of incompetence and derelict of duty.

If you want to be objective, then your conclusions should be derived from evidence rather than from bias.

Your problem is you already have all the evidence and won't tolerate anything that challenges your preconceived notions .

 

[ll74]

Your problem is you already have all the evidence and won't tolerate anything that challenges your preconceived notions .

You just finished telling me that I don't have all the evidence and now this?

Pick a lane.

You're the one making conclusions, not me. (Chloe seems to have figured it all out as well) Upon your last comment, we both agree that the full evidence is not known. I guess it depends on whether you feel you're winning an argument to determine your arguments.

 

[Rightguide]

You just finished telling me that I don't have all the evidence and now this?

Pick a lane.

You're the one making conclusions, not me. (Chloe seems to have figured it all out as well) Upon your last comment, we both agree that the full evidence is not known. I guess it depends on whether you feel you're winning an argument to determine your arguments.

Show me what conclusions I have made.

 

[ll74]

Show me what conclusions I have made.

Lol...are you being serious? Maybe reread your own posts and tell me.....the thread you posted in also gives some hints

 

[Rightguide]

An Assassination Attempt Reveals DEI’s False Promises​

By Scott Sturman
July 19, 2024

"He who occupies the high ground... will fight to advantage." —Sun Tzu

For over a half century the proponents of DEI and its intellectual precursors have fought from high ground, not from a moral position, but a tactical and strategic one secured by Marxist indoctrination that has pervaded nearly every corner of society.


The deliberate and methodical campaign has successfully muted public criticism, although privately most Americans felt that there is something terribly wrong with a philosophy that prioritizes appearance over ability. 

DEI's commanding role in all branches of the military has resulted in no tangible benefits but a myriad of failures—falling morale and standards, recruitment shortfalls, plummeting public confidence in the military, poor leadership, and with the exception of the Marine Corps, the inability to fulfill basic mission requirements at an acceptable level.

The armed forces have not experienced a graphic, seminal event that aroused extensive public sentiment and exposed the deterioration of all branches of the military. Even the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle, which defied nearly every axiom of military doctrine, resulted with every responsible general's career intact, and the disaster was soon lost in the mainstream media news cycle. 

The few who understood the ramifications of DEI observed, "The emperor has no clothes," were muted and repudiated as racists to be bombarded by relentless personal attacks or suffocated by outright censorship. But within an instant in front of a worldwide live audience, the attempted assassination of President Trump laid bare the outright incompetence of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS), a once elite organization led by an unqualified director who has made DEI the USSS's cornerstone.

The USSS under the leadership of Kimberly Cheatle, a political appointee with inadequate leadership experience, has made DEI a top priority within the organization. It is reported that there is turmoil within the ranks of the agency and concerns relating to its operational capabilities. The once vaunted standards of the elite USSS are now an apparition, as candidates are selected by quotas defined by group identity. The results of this foray into the realm of selection processes meant to bolster self esteem resulted in disaster. Rather than staff the agency with hardened professionals, who display the physical attributes necessary to protect the President in a crisis and possess the experience to prevent the assassination in the first place, the USSS relies on those less qualified to serve.

The assassin was not the savvy professional whose mission was to assassinate Charles de Gaulle in Forsyth's book, Day of the Jackal, but a rank amateur who was able to avoid the inept USSS and secure the high ground that offered a close-range, direct shot at the President. Any competent rifleman with an adequate weapon could have succeeded, yet Director Cheatle, oblivious to the inadequacies of the organization she controls, praised the USSS's performance. She states the “buck stops” with her but refuses to resign, secure in the fact that as a DEI appointee she is granted great latitude with regard to performance.

More here: https://www.realcleardefense.com/ar...empt_reveals_deis_false_promises_1045769.html

This is only the beginning of the wave of thoughts and consequences that are only now beginning to roll out.

 

[Rightguide]

Lol...are you being serious? Maybe reread your own posts and tell me.....the thread you posted in also gives some hints

All I have discovered so far is the incompetence that allowed this to happen and the facts that are known to us as we speak. The real story is yet to come.