Bernie Sanders’ rape-fantasy essay reveals left-wing hypocrisy

[NeverEndingMe]

why being a democrat is a sign of mental illness

Consider this twisted scenario: A national publication unearths an essay written decades ago by a conservative Republican candidate for the White House in which the man describes, in deviant detail, women who fantasize about being gang-raped. He also writes about men who get thrills by imagining episodes in which they physically force females into degrading sex acts capable of making readers of Hustler rise up in revulsion.

Shock! Outrage! The National Organization for Women would launch a petition drive calling for the man’s head and other body parts.

President Obama would warn that the offensive piece of writing contributes to an “epidemic’’ of sexual assault on college and university campuses. Across America, ladies enrolled in institutions of higher education would earn course credit by schlepping around mattresses on their backs as forms of protest/performance-art projects.

http://nypost.com/2015/06/05/bernie-sanders-rape-fantasy-essay-reveals-left-wing-hypocrisy/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=NYP%20180%20Day%20Openers%20and%2030%20Day%20Signups&utm_campaign=NY%2520Post%2520Newsletter

 

[lovecraft68]

Sanders went to UVA?

 

[badbabysitter]

so your upset that some women have rape fantasies

fuck, you better not visit Literotica.. there's an entire Non-consensual section


I recommend you boycott the site at once

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

why being a democrat is a sign of mental illness




http://nypost.com/2015/06/05/bernie-sanders-rape-fantasy-essay-reveals-left-wing-hypocrisy/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=NYP%20180%20Day%20Openers%20and%2030%20Day%20Signups&utm_campaign=NY%2520Post%2520Newsletter

Sanders wrote erotica and someone ( who tries and fails miserably) is complaining about it, on a site FILLED with erotic writing.

What's the matter Jen? Jealous?

This "story" just means that the right feels threatened by Sanders. Why else try to gin up outrage over a paper written 40+ years ago?