someoneyouknow
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Posts
- 28,274
As many threads on here have asked, how does one get creative? Other threads have asked, how do you get out of a writing rut? It seems the answer to both questions is to be distracted.
Distracted in the sense you don't work on one story but on two, and you alternate between them. This switching back and forth of your mental process is akin to eating different foods during a meal. If you only eat the same food, your tongue grows "tired" and eventually the same bit of food tastes bland and unappetizing.
In this article, the BBC uses the term multitasking to represent distraction.
Read the article for a bit more insight into how alternating what you do may lead you to better creativity. It certainly can't hurt.
http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20180605-why-being-easily-distracted-can-be-a-very-good-thing
Distracted in the sense you don't work on one story but on two, and you alternate between them. This switching back and forth of your mental process is akin to eating different foods during a meal. If you only eat the same food, your tongue grows "tired" and eventually the same bit of food tastes bland and unappetizing.
In this article, the BBC uses the term multitasking to represent distraction.
To find out whether multitasking could help us to break out of that rut, Jackson Lu and a team at Columbia Business School used a common laboratory test of creativity. Participants had to think of as many uses as possible of a common object, like a kitchen bowl, within a fixed amount of time. (One valid answer might be that you wear the bowl as a hat to protect your hair from the rain, for instance.)
The participants had to complete the task twice, finding alternative uses for a brick and a toothpick. The only difference was that some were asked to do so in blocks, listing all the uses for the brick first before turning their full attention to the toothpick, while others were told to alternate between the two tasks.
According to [Alexander Graham] Bell’s view that immersed concentration is the key to creativity, you might expect the first group to perform better – but this wasn’t what the team found. “While they might have felt that they were on a roll, the reality was that without the breaks afforded by the continual task switching, their actual progress was limited.”
From the sheer number of ideas they produced to the perceived novelty of the ideas (as assessed by independent judges), the multitaskers performed better.
The participants had to complete the task twice, finding alternative uses for a brick and a toothpick. The only difference was that some were asked to do so in blocks, listing all the uses for the brick first before turning their full attention to the toothpick, while others were told to alternate between the two tasks.
According to [Alexander Graham] Bell’s view that immersed concentration is the key to creativity, you might expect the first group to perform better – but this wasn’t what the team found. “While they might have felt that they were on a roll, the reality was that without the breaks afforded by the continual task switching, their actual progress was limited.”
From the sheer number of ideas they produced to the perceived novelty of the ideas (as assessed by independent judges), the multitaskers performed better.
Read the article for a bit more insight into how alternating what you do may lead you to better creativity. It certainly can't hurt.
http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20180605-why-being-easily-distracted-can-be-a-very-good-thing