Barr Will Find Spying On Trump Directed By Obama.

GILFinTEXAS

Experienced
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Posts
59
http://www.floppingaces.net/2019/04/11/barr-will-find-spying-on-trump-direced-by-obama/

This is a must read, it lays it all out, from the fake email accounts Obama had that connected to Clinton, to telling the FBI not to indict!

HE IS THE GUILTY ONE

Perhaps not directly or by explicit orders but rather by discussing the threat to his legacy Trump represented with his progressive minions and then simply saying, as crime bosses throughout history have done, “You know what needs to be done. Do it.”
 
Barr lost all credibility with his spy story. The Mueller report should be taken out of his hands.
 
Oh goodness, an editorial by one Daniel J. Sobieski...

Let's see, where have I heard that name before?

Oh yes, that's right, he's the assclown who uses Russian bots and gory pictures to get his message heard 'round the globe.

GilfInTexas, mayhaps you are a Russian bot as well?
 
Oh goodness, an editorial by one Daniel J. Sobieski...

Let's see, where have I heard that name before?

Oh yes, that's right, he's the assclown who uses Russian bots and gory pictures to get his message heard 'round the globe.

GilfInTexas, mayhaps you are a Russian bot as well?

when you attack an author and not mention why the contents may be wrong, you lose the agrument

Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
 
View PostOld Today, 03:38 PM
Remove user from ignore listRobDownSouth
This message is hidden because RobDownSouth is on your ignore list.

FUCKING NIGGER
 
when you attack an author and not mention why the contents may be wrong, you lose the agrument

Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
So why the dubious link nobody dares to click on?
 
when you attack an author and not mention why the contents may be wrong, you lose the agrument

Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.

Russian bot sez whut?

Sobieski is a third tier hack who tries fruitlessly to out-outrage Hannity.
 
Right on que (sic), Little Queef shows up with his patented "shoot teh messenger" patter.

"but..but...george soros!"

#PewPewPew
#HeTriesSooooHard

You were saying? ^ :confused:

Oh goodness, an editorial by one Daniel J. Sobieski...

Let's see, where have I heard that name before?

Oh yes, that's right, he's the assclown who uses Russian bots and gory pictures to get his message heard 'round the globe.

GilfInTexas, mayhaps you are a Russian bot as well?

BoofedDownSouth shows up with his patented "Shoot the messenger" patter above^

...then doubles down and shoots him again when called put for shooting the messenger with out arguing at all the content of the message.

Russian bot sez whut?

Sobieski is a third tier hack who tries fruitlessly to out-outrage Hannity.
 
You were saying? ^ :confused:



BoofedDownSouth shows up with his patented "Shoot the messenger" patter above^

...then doubles down and shoots him again when called put for shooting the messenger with out arguing at all the content of the message.

There is a difference. When I reference Snopes.com, you reflexively splutter "but...but...George Soros" because that's what the hivemind has conditioned you to do. Never mind that George Soros has nothing to do with the fact-finding of Snopes.com.

There IS, however, plenty of evidence connecting Assclown Sobieski to botnets and other unsavory elements of the internets. As such, his writing is considered suspect.

Nice "bro cavalry" attempt, though. Have you given Granny the unsolicited "analysis of your writing style" that you've foisted on other unsuspecting women here yet?

#BroCavalry
#HeTriesSooooHard
#TimeToTriggerTehTranny
 
There is a difference. When I reference Snopes.com, you reflexively splutter "but...but...George Soros" because that's what the hivemind has conditioned you to do. Never mind that George Soros has nothing to do with the fact-finding of Snopes.com.

There IS, however, plenty of evidence connecting Assclown Sobieski to botnets and other unsavory elements of the internets. As such, his writing is considered suspect.

Nice "bro cavalry" attempt, though. Have you given Granny the unsolicited "analysis of your writing style" that you've foisted on other unsuspecting women here yet?

#BroCavalry
#HeTriesSooooHard
#TimeToTriggerTehTranny

have you read the content? you are a foolish person, a non thinking person, a vapid person.
 
since barr would have trouble finding his dick in the dark unless he tied a string on it, outcome doubtful.
 
Having a conversation with yourself on a public discussion forum is a sign of terminal bananas.
 
http://www.floppingaces.net/2019/04/11/barr-will-find-spying-on-trump-direced-by-obama/

This is a must read, it lays it all out, from the fake email accounts Obama had that connected to Clinton, to telling the FBI not to indict!

HE IS THE GUILTY ONE




I agree with you. The lefty lunes on this site are suffering from acute TDS and have their heads in the sand. It starts with Hilary's use of an unsecured server 18 U.S. code 1924, The Steele dossier, miss leading the FISA court, lying to congress, obstruction of justice ( deleting subpoenaed E-MAILS ) collusion with foreign government and unmasking of civilians, on and on! I don't waste my breath with presenting a point of argument to them. They lost the election in spite of all the shit going on. To quote Obama's spiritual leader Louis Farrakhan " Chickens Coming Home To Roost". Names of the alleged, James Clapper, John Brennan, Lisa Page, Sally Yates, Peter McCabe, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Randall Coleman, Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, to name a few.
 
Also, you chose "gilfintexas" as a username? If you describe yourself as a gilf, doesn't that just mean you wank a lot?

Apologies about the Texas thing.
 
When it comes to politics, there's always enough to do dealing with all the shit there is now. Obsessing over how bad the predecessors were is just a distraction.

There is always a flip in power. What was done to one side will be done to the other.

You will have trump and company fill the news for years to come.
 
Back
Top