Bard-a-thon (one for perdita)

Seattle Zack

Count each one
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Posts
1,128
What would 150 nubile young women at an all-female college do to earn a spot in the Guinness Book of World Records?

No, this is not the Story Ideas thread..... this is the Author's Hangout, remember?

------------------------------------
WELLESLEY, Massachusetts (AP) -- To read or not to read. And in 24 hours?

That was the question for the Wellesley College Shakespeare Society, which now has the answer.

The group, assisted by other enthusiasts, on Monday finished an all-night read-a-thon of William Shakespeare's complete works in what may be a record 22 hours and five minutes.

More than 150 people read aloud from Sunday at sunset until about 3:22 p.m. Monday. Five groups read simultaneously and continuously, banging a cymbal as each play, sonnet or poem was finished.

"Shakespeare or all-nighter to study? I would take a night of Shakespeare over any other all-nighter experience I've ever had," said Christiana Molldrem, a sophomore member of the society. "It was one of the most amazing experiences I've ever had in my life."

The 31-member society at the all-women's college outside Boston was joined by Shakespeare enthusiasts of all ages. The group has contacted the Guinness Book of World Records to find out if it has set any records, but they have not yet heard the results.

Wellesley's entire unabridged canon included 39 plays, 154 sonnets and poetry. Readings were held in five rooms in the society's Victorian Tudor house on campus: two rooms for history plays, one comedy room, a tragedy room and a room for "problem plays" -- a term some literary scholars use to describe a work that can't be classified into one of the other groups.

The marathon reading concluded with "Hamlet." More than 60 people read the play simultaneously, Molldrem said.

Molldrem, who stayed up the entire time, planned to design certificates for volunteers that read, "I saw the ghost," referring to the ghost of Hamlet's father.

Society president Alison Buchbinder said she was extremely tired after reciting so many "thees" and "thous."

"We've just spoken so many words and so many lines and lived so many lives," she said. "To finally be back in the 21st century, it was a little shocking."
 
Thank you, Zack. Wish I had been there. Loved the room names; two for history, eh? I'm going to suggest something like this to my English prof. friends. Off to read a soliloquy or two.

anon,

Perdita :rose:
 
Seattle Zack said:
Molldrem, who stayed up the entire time, planned to design certificates for volunteers that read, "I saw the ghost," referring to the ghost of Hamlet's father.

Err... Duh!

Gauche
 
Re: Re: Re: Bard-a-thon (one for perdita)

minsue said:
We're Americans, Gauche, we need the 'Duh' hints.
Good grief, not for The Ghost!?! I'm embarrassed (again).

Perdita
 
I refuse to read any stuff where the guys have stupid gay names like Bottom and Thane of Cawdor.

If they were called Chuck and Hank, then maybe.
 
I think it's amazing to see how Shakespeare's "Macbeth" has been so inspired by Terry Pratchett's "Wyrd Sisters".:)
 
If I met a bloke named Thane of Cawdor I wouldn't be writing erotica :p .

Joe, thou protesteth too hotly. Everyfuckingbody was gay in Elizabethan England you git.

Perdita
 
I pity anyone who had to read Merry Wives of Windsor. Pisses over Falstaff's good name. That play should be edited - change the character's name will do fine.
 
O, Sancho, I haven't read it, don't make me. But lovable as he is, Falstaff was a rogue who happened to have a wit to match Hal (and Sh's audiences). What did MWW do to his swarthy rep?

Perdita
 
Well as Harold Bloom (my favourite Shakespeare critic at the moment) says:

"No longer witty in himself or the cause of wit in other men, this Falstaff would make me lament a lost glory if I did not know him to be a rank impostor. His fascination, indeed, is that Shakespeare wastes nothing upon him."

He refers to that incarnation of the immortal Falstaff as "pseudo-Falstaff" as the comic appeal is throwing Falstaff into the Thames, and other slapstick inanities.

And just so you know, Falstaff's wit far outmatched Hal's.
 
sanchopanza said:
And just so you know, Falstaff's wit far outmatched Hal's.
Yes, I'll give you that for now. Thanks anyway, I can't bear Harold Bloom.

ta, Perdita
 
Although I'm utterly outraged that you could not like Harold Bloom, I have to ask just who you think is any better.
 
Sanch, my library is at home and I'm bad with names, I'll get back to you.

Seriously, I started that last big bard-book (invention of the human?) and within 50 pages realized I was not going to learn anything new. Bloom is a prodigious regurgitator. Listen, I know you're young so you can't have that much to compare him to, but I assure you, he's a flashy horse & pony show. Do you know how much he's produced? He lives on his long ago laurels, it's a shame really. He's like the Dick Clark of academia.

P.

edited to add this: Jas. Shapiro

Did a quick search. I've read Shapiro's Sh're and the Jews; he happens to be a former student of my Sh're prof. and now friend, who has also written more than one Sh're text. This is an incisive and fair review; in fact I think he's being generous, or kind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bard-a-thon (one for perdita)

perdita said:
Good grief, not for The Ghost!?! I'm embarrassed (again).

Perdita

I'm not saying I needed the hint! Just that many of our fellow Americans do! I happen to adore Hamlet and, oddly, have much of it memorized. :D
 
I had a hamster called Hamlet when I was a kid. Hope this helps.
 
Nope, it was "Hamlet". Scout's honour. I can send a photo of his little grave. I used two iced lolly sticks (that's popsicle sticks to you). No, wait, Hamlet was the one the cat got... I can show you "Mingus's" grave. He looked pretty much the same as Hamlet.
 
I've read Shapiro, Kermode, Hazlitt, Coleridge, Johnson, G.Wilson Knight, Peter Alexander, AC Bradley, Harold Goddard, Pater, Thomas Carlyle, Stendhal and a few others that don't spring to mind.

The reason I like Bloom is because he is a regurgitator, but a conservative one. My approach to Shakespeare is determinedly conservative so it suits me greatly to read and reread a single 745 page volume instead of wasting my time with scores of other books on the subject. One of the few books that I enjoyed which dealt with marginal topics was Kermode's Shakespeare's language, but overall I do prefer to read plain and regurgitated conservative criticism.
 
Rewrite Shakespeare?

Sanch, I could add a dozen more names to your list but I won't, stick with Bloom as you choose.

Here's something you might find of interest or challenge.

The Atlantic Monthly | March 2004 - Writing Contest - Rewrite Shakespeare

Try your hand at rewriting Shakespeare's "All the world's a stage" speech from As You Like It. A sidebar to "Would Shakespeare Get Into Swarthmore?"

It's unsettling to think that Shakespeare wouldn't be able to get into Swarthmore College these days, what with the new SAT's essay section that rewards form over creativity and insight. When we applied the College Board's essay-grading rubric to Jacques' beloved "All the world's a stage" speech from As You Like It, Shakespeare didn't do so well, scoring only a 2 out of a possible 6. If he had known what the College Board was looking for, we're sure that Shakespeare could have given them what they wanted. But since he isn't around to defend himself, we're asking Atlantic readers to do it for him.

But just what are SAT essay graders looking for?

1) Organization. Topic and concluding sentences, as well as some examples from literature, history, and current events to support your ideas.

2) Paragraph breaks and length. One long, unbroken paragraph just doesn't cut it. It doesn't look like an essay. At least three paragraphs and you're on the right track.

3) SAT words. Don't you know that grownups are supposed to use long words whenever they can?

4) Sentence structure. Don't use too many simple sentences. Complex people think complex thoughts, and must often, therefore, write complex sentences.

(For the College Board's explanation of how the new SAT essay will be scored, click here.)

Beginning February 17, 2004, The Princeton Review will accept revisions of the "All the world's a stage" speech from As You Like It. The revision should be in response to the same assignment given to "Shakespeare" in the article "Would Shakespeare Get Into Swarthmore?". Members of our staff will score selected revisions according to the College Board's rubric, and post them, along with grader comments, on The Atlantic Online. New postings will go up each Tuesday. The number of graded and posted revisions will depend upon the volume of revisions submitted. The deadline for entries is March 10, 2004. On March 16, 2004, we will announce up to ten winners on The Atlantic Online. The winning revisions are those judged by The Princeton Review staff as best according to the College Board's essay grading rubric.

Each winner will receive one paperback copy of The Best American Essays of the Century, edited by Joyce Carol Oates and Robert Atwan, and The Best American Short Stories of the Century, edited by John Updike and Katrina Kenison.

The writers of revisions selected for posting on The Atlantic Online will be notified before such postings are made. All scores as determined by the decision of The Princeton Review judging staff are final. Selection of winners is solely at the discretion of The Princeton Review. The Princeton Review makes no guarantees that all revisions will be scored, or that all scored revisions will be posted on The Atlantic Online.

For the complete official rules of the Rewrite Shakespeare contest, click here.

Submit your revision of Shakespeare's "All the world's a stage" speech.

Submissions must include the revision of the speech, and the writer's full name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and daytime and evening phone numbers.

For all links go to this page: article
 
Back
Top