Bad-guy character... to kill, or not to kill, that is the question...!

Should my antagonist Keith be killed off near the start of Ch.04, or allowed to live?

  • Yes, the bastard deserves what's coming to him...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No! He reminds me too much of myself, and I CAN'T die! That would be just so WRONG! :D

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1

TheCaptain

Aussie Thunder
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Posts
3,149
Hello all :D

I'm writing a series called Caribbean Cruise at the moment, and in it, one of the characters, a supporting castmember, if you will, has come to tick me off in a major way. His name is Keith Stevens, married to Kimberley Collins, and from the very start it has been made clear that his relationship with his wife is strained and, further down the track, it is learnt that his relationship with his sister-in-law Ashley is far from proper.... he has been cheating on his wife with her.

Though I do admit he is a semi-major part of the story, and removing him in a violent manner (at the moment as what I have wirtten of chapter 04 of Caribbean Cruise stands, having two of the main characters, both other men, stab him in the side and throw him over the side of their yacht, to be carried away into the wild windswept seas for the sharks and other creatures of nature to devour, is probably a pretty darn harsh way to go) might be difficult to incorporate into the tale, with the fact that the two supposedly 'good' main male characters are responsible for this guy's murder... something I admit might be hard to sell to the readers straight out.

I just got writing one night, and I guess my inner thoughts on the issue came out... Keith was the 'other man' to the main character Rick, and before I really knew what was happening, both he and Andrew Collins, Kim's father, had burst into the room to catch the cheating husband, the man who had slept with Rick's girlfriend Ashley, slapping around his own wife. Andrew grabs Keith, drags him out of the room and up onto the deck, though Kim begs him to leave her husband alone.

She isnt in good shape and Rick tells her its alright, that they just want to talk to her, and tells her to rest. He goes up after the two men, afraid that something could go wrong and Keith could be hurt at Andrew's hands, but then he starts to get angry himself when he thinks of how the wife-beater had abused Kim, and how he had slept with his own girlfreind behind his back. In a rage, the two men, Rick seeing red and Andrew angry and with little time left to live, agree with just a look to deal with Keith permanently.

Andrew goes over into a storage area, pulls out a machete, comes round from behind Keith and slashes him across the back, then, with the deep cut pouring blood out onto the rain-swept deck, they both haul him over the side into the ocean below...

What do you all think? Its just a story I know that, but MURDER? A bit too harsh? I just think Keith is a sleaze and he isnt a MAJOR benefit to the tale... an interesting way of dealing with him... something to bring the two other men closer together, to make their bond of friendship tighter still. I could rewrite it to have them boot Keith off at the nearest settlement wehn they take on fresh supplies, and tell him to make it under his own steam back to the States where Kimberley will be filing for an immediate and unchallenged divorce... is that, perhaps, the better option?

At least no violence there, everyone goes home happy.... well, not Keith either way, but at least in option two he's still alive! :p

I would especially be interested to know what anyone who has read my Caribbean Cruise stories thinks of the above options in dealing with Keith, as they would know of him a little better than I have explained...

Thank you very much for reading, and please enjoy the site! :cool:
 
TheCaptain said:
I'm writing a series ... and in it, one of the characters... has come to tick me off in a major way. ...
Pardon my amazement. It never ceases to surprise me that authors, good authors such as yourself, can write in this fashion. I need to know pretty exactly what will happen to all the main characters in my stories before I start to write any actual text.

Non-major characters don't really exist and neither I nor the reader, cares what happens to them.

This is not a criticism, just expressing my sense of wonder at the different ways people can write. As Charles Churchill said, "By diff'rent strokes do diff'rent men excel".
 
snooper said:
Pardon my amazement. It never ceases to surprise me that authors, good authors such as yourself, can write in this fashion. I need to know pretty exactly what will happen to all the main characters in my stories before I start to write any actual text.

Non-major characters don't really exist and neither I nor the reader, cares what happens to them.

This is not a criticism, just expressing my sense of wonder at the different ways people can write. As Charles Churchill said, "By diff'rent strokes do diff'rent men excel".
lol thanks for the compliment, and thanks for sharing your own thoughts on the subject. I too like to have a GENERAL idea on where the story is going to go, and I DID have one in dealing with Keith and booting him out of the tale, but it just so happened that when I came out of one of my trance-like states when starting chapter 04, I'd killed him off! :D

Do you perhaps have any thoughts on what I should do, keep things the way they are already or keep him alive? No one's seemed to have voted on the poll yet :(, so I'll see what a few people think in a day or so and then carry on working on it... should have it submitted to Lit for posting in about a week and a half, maybe two weeks :)
 
He may be vital to the next story so you may want to leave his death or not a mystery in order to use it to write a new story. Then again if he doesn't really matter much you could kill him and get your revenge or just have him disappear and wandering the halls for eternity.

It might be fun to have him realize that the author (you) doesnt like him and is trying to kill him off but I don't know if it would go with the flow of the story. It would make a good start for a new story though.
 
snooper said:
Pardon my amazement. It never ceases to surprise me that authors, good authors such as yourself, can write in this fashion. I need to know pretty exactly what will happen to all the main characters in my stories before I start to write any actual text.

Non-major characters don't really exist and neither I nor the reader, cares what happens to them.

This is not a criticism, just expressing my sense of wonder at the different ways people can write. As Charles Churchill said, "By diff'rent strokes do diff'rent men excel".


Good point on your first paragraph. All my stories seem to come to me all at once. Some people dislike me for that because I can write so seemingly easily but sometimes it's a pain because there are a lot of things I'd like to write about but can never finish because I can't come up with an ending if it isnt already there to begin with.
 
I voted "No" though I am not like Keith. But living would be worse punishment. Better he just loses everything.
 
sirhugs said:
I voted "No" though I am not like Keith. But living would be worse punishment. Better he just loses everything.
Okay, well I guess only a VERY small number of ppl here have read my Cab Cruise stories (just one! :( :p). Sirhugs, consider it changed! :D

Besides, after I'd typed up the part when Rick and Andrew do away with Keith, I kept thinking... would that be REALLY what they do? Would it sit right with the readers? And I came to the conclusion myself that it probably wouldnt...

Just to make a comment too on the way I write - for the most part I write down the main plots in my storylines, and then write up the bits in between the way that I think is best at the time... my tales are pretty fluently-written, with much room for improvement, but the base points are set in stone before the very first keystroke. This allows me to make those changes and add in those little extra ideas, if I dont believe it will ruin the story. It makes thinks easier for me, personally, and I've been writing this way for years with, for the most part, success :D

But yes, different strokes for different folks, thats the whole process in a nutshell... Happy Lit'ing, ppl! :nana:
 
If Keith dies, it ought to be acidental. caught in a deck line and strangled? drowning? shot as an intruder?
 
Back
Top