H
HSWriter
Guest
NO
I did not delete your damn post... look at the post... YOU edited the post, not me....
I did not delete your damn post... look at the post... YOU edited the post, not me....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HSWriter said:I did not delete your damn post... look at the post... YOU edited the post, not me....
I don't know either of you, really, but Samuari? Is it possible that you're human and you accidently did the delete yourself when you were editing? I'd give HSWriter the benefit of the doubt- I don't think he has the power to delete posts here, only Laurel does.Samuari said:HSWriter said:I did not delete your damn post... look at the post... YOU edited the post, not me....
My editing consisted of corecting spelling. Your deminstrated intolerance for critisim makes you the prime suspect. I want to know how it happened, if you did not do it.
Samuari said:The only explanation that seems to fit the facts is for some to have hacked into Laurel and Manu’s system, and acquired their passwords.
Weird Harold said:the BB software will add "edited by Laurel..." when her name and password is used. Likewise It would add Manu's name as the editor. That's the whole point of the "Edited by" stamp in a post. It's there to show when a post was edited and by whom.
I do not know of any way that your post could have been deliberately edited by anyone without leaving a edit stamp.
[/B]
Weird Harold said:
That doesn't fit the facts either, because the BB software will add "edited by Laurel..." when her name and password is used. Likewise It would add Manu's name as the editor. That's the whole point of the "Edited by" stamp in a post. It's there to show when a post was edited and by whom.
April said:Weird Harold said:the BB software will add "edited by Laurel..." when her name and password is used. Likewise It would add Manu's name as the editor. That's the whole point of the "Edited by" stamp in a post. It's there to show when a post was edited and by whom.
I do not know of any way that your post could have been deliberately edited by anyone without leaving a edit stamp.
Are you sure about that, WH? Because I could swear that in the thread with that spam, that there was no edit stamp. And that's in the General Board, which is Laurel and Manu's domain. I will go check. This whole thing is curious. [/B]
April said:[QUOTE
Are you sure about that, WH? Because I could swear that in the thread with that spam, that there was no edit stamp. And that's in the General Board, which is Laurel and Manu's domain. I will go check. This whole thing is curious.
R Nitelight said:Countess DeWinter.
Cheyenne said:Wrong. Check this one: ...
Laurel deleted the troll's posts entirely in that thread (as she should have) and then edited mine where I quoted him. My post now says something like "I'm a mean old troll" in place of my quote from his attack on Angelique's son. And there is no mention in my post about Laurel having edited it. It shows that I edited it.
Weird Harold said:It would appear that you edited the post after Laurel did. Was there an edit stamp from Laurel's edit in the post before you edited, or did you edite it before she did?
It would appear that this (vB) BB software will only allow one edited stamp per post. The old UBB software would treat the edit stamp as being part of the text and stamp a post every time it was edited.