When I find a story that I like here or at some other erotica site, I generally will see if the author has posted others. If so, I will read several more. If I like a number of them, I will usually send the author a note expressing my appreciation if they have provided a means of contact. Normally, I will at least mention which story was my favorite. If they wrote something I thought was clever, I might mention that. After that, I'm not sure how much more I should say.
Sometimes I am tempted to get a bit graphic and explain which parts of the stories I especially liked. I remember once, for example, complimenting a woman on how she wrote such wonderful descriptions of blowjobs, and received a nice note in reply. Other times, my messages are completely ignored. That smarts a bit, especially if I have put some time into my comments.
So, if you receive feedback from your readers, how much information becomes too much? Do you like learning which scenes they thought were the best? Do you like hearing how aroused they got? Descriptions of how hard or wet they were? Or would you prefer more staid commentary?
Sometimes I am tempted to get a bit graphic and explain which parts of the stories I especially liked. I remember once, for example, complimenting a woman on how she wrote such wonderful descriptions of blowjobs, and received a nice note in reply. Other times, my messages are completely ignored. That smarts a bit, especially if I have put some time into my comments.
So, if you receive feedback from your readers, how much information becomes too much? Do you like learning which scenes they thought were the best? Do you like hearing how aroused they got? Descriptions of how hard or wet they were? Or would you prefer more staid commentary?