ATTN LIT POSTER KNOWN AS pecksniff...aka, pecker sniffer

[SyLent]

TWICE I axed you why we shouldnt cite Breitbart sources

TWICE you said

Cause WIKISHIT said so

and

Some "media" watchdog said so

TWICE I axed you

What sources are credible

Why are the two above worth listening to

Why they have cred for anyone to cite THEM as telling us what to do

Since then

You have had multiple useless posts

AND

No answers to the above questions

AXED

 

[SyLent]

Pecker Sniffer still MIA

 

[SyLent]

so where is PeckerSniffer NIGGER?

https://th.bing.com/th/id/Reeac45c7ec18741026fb935739754086?rik=bQ52urC8gKXElg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fauctionsound.s3.amazonaws.com%2fclients%2fauctionproscahem%2finventory%2f11197%2f13342525510001-dsc05035.jpg&ehk=wkHSKxAvZf%2b%2bF4iez57%2bHXBjD3GqXJTE%2fgv3FxQaTz0%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

 

[SyLent]

so prick sniffer has buncha more posts

yet still cunt respond!

 

[pecksniff]

For judgment regarding the credibility of media outlets, I place my reliance on RationalWiki -- which definitely is biased, but only in the direction of reason and science -- and Media Bias Fact Check, which is "unscientific" in its methods but without any perceptible bias.

But, you don't need any such sources to know that Breitbart and Newsmax and their ilk are shit, never to be cited or trusted by anyone rational. The MSM sources the RWs on this board are always blasting have at any rate immeasurably more credibility by comparison. I know something about this because I was a newspaper reporter and editor once.

 

[SyLent]

For judgment regarding the credibility of media outlets, I place my reliance on RationalWiki -- which definitely is biased, but only in the direction of reason and science -- and Media Bias Fact Check, which is "unscientific" in its methods but without any perceptible bias.

But, you don't need any such sources to know that Breitbart and Newsmax and their ilk are shit, never to be cited or trusted by anyone rational.

why?~

tell us what sites are "trustworthy" and why

 

[SyLent]

For judgment regarding the credibility of media outlets, I place my reliance on RationalWiki -- which definitely is biased, but only in the direction of reason and science -- and Media Bias Fact Check, which is "unscientific" in its methods but without any perceptible bias.

But, you don't need any such sources to know that Breitbart and Newsmax and their ilk are shit, never to be cited or trusted by anyone rational. The MSM sources the RWs on this board are always blasting have at any rate immeasurably more credibility by comparison. I know something about this because I was a newspaper reporter and editor once.

define reason

whose reason

 

[pecksniff]

why?~

tell us what sites are "trustworthy" and why

Wikipedia, always. RationalWiki, usually. CNN, mostly. NYT, always. WaPo, always. WJS, usually WRT news, never WRT editorials. In all cases, based on track record.

 

[SyLent]

of LEFT WING BIAS

so bottom line is

you dont like Breitbart cause the slant is AWAY from you

thats fine

but dont be a NIGGER and say NEVER POST A LINK