Are you up with "wealth-speak"?

G

Guest

Guest
Super Rich Can Afford Their Own Language NYT, 6.20.2004

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With the rich not only getting more numerous but richer by the year, a new language of "wealth-speak'' has been created by bankers who are desperate to get a slice of their lucrative business.

Readers of the Eighth Annual World Wealth Report, published this week by investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER.N) and consulting firm Capgemini, get full exposure to this euphemistic new-age language.

The word "millionaire'' shows up only twice in the report -- in the footnotes. Instead, individuals with more than $1 million in financial assets, excluding their main home, are called HNWIs, or "high net worth individuals'' by the authors, using a term coined by the banking industry.

"Ultra-HNWIs'' are the super rich, defined as a small but rapidly growing group of 70,000 individuals with more than $30 million in assets. It was Merrill who pegged the "ultra'' threshold at $30 million, a few years ago.

The report estimates there were 7.7 million millionaires around the world at the end of 2003, up by half a million from 2002.

The head of Capgemini's securities industry, Alvi Abuaf, in an interview noted intense competition among banks and asset managers to snag these clients and get access to a larger part of their wallets. However, the study isn't quite as straightforward.

It prefers to frame the question in terms of helping financial institutions "solve'' the world's 7.7 million millionaires' "financial problems.''

Fortunately, along with Sofia Chappuis and Robert Low, both managers at Capgemini who helped compile the data and write the report, Abuaf spent considerable time explaining the report to those who have never considered writing a "family mission statement.''

The report, for example, suggests that financial advisors should target the HNWIs in their "lean years'' for "cross-generational planning.''

Translation, according to Capgemini: Some wealthy people have children. Those children might not have much to invest today, but, once they inherit their parents' money, they may be tomorrow's mega-millionaires and will make their bankers very happy. By any other name, the strategy is simply one of sales' basic tenets: start small, finish big.

A lot of the suggestions "are based on common sense,'' acknowledged Capgemini's Chappuis.

"Holistic reporting'' and "dynamic re-valuation'' are among the other ideas discussed in the study. These are not as revolutionary as they might sound. They mean putting all assets and liabilities in one report rather sending the information out piecemeal, and adjusting clients' financial portfolios as market conditions change.

The report says that even the reasonably wealthy are always looking to the treatment handed out to those with a few million more dollars above them in the pecking order.

The "mass affluent'' -- those with $500,000 to $1 million -- want financial planning, a service offered only to HNWIs just five years ago, according to Abuaf. Those with between $1 and $5 million, meanwhile, want the red carpet usually saved for those with more.

Those whose art collections and oil wells put them in a category of their own expect "platinum treatment,'' once reserved for institutions. That could include offering sophisticated financial tools, such as those that measure a portfolio's risk in the face of market swings.

These ultra-HNWIs have, according to the Chappuis, "multi-jurisdictional needs.'' This might mean they have a villa in Tuscany and an apartment in London, as well as a mansion in Connecticut.

They get their own "Family Office,'' a team of professionals serving their accounts under a single umbrella (sometimes referred to as a "virtual network''). It's as cozy as it gets for the super wealthy -- the new aunts and uncles are tax accountants and trust and estate lawyers.
 
perdita said:
I know loaded, but brassic? I guess it means poor, but why, or how? You Brits. P.

Yes, it does mean poor. "Pennyless" to be more precise. I'm not quite sure where it comes from, but it is widely used here.

I presume (but could be completely wrong) it is derived from "brass". Brass being the lesser metal.

Google, here I come. ;)

Lou
 
sailorm72003 said:
Lucky Google :)

Sailor

:kiss:

And I did. :D

"There is a Cockney rhyming slang expression "boracic" or "brassic" meaning "penniless". It derives from "boracic lint" (a kind of poultice), rhyming with "skint" (corruption of "skinned"), and is always quoted as an authentic Cockney phrase, but I have my doubts.

I first heard it used in the mid-1970s sit-com "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin" by a character who was an unemployed middle-class actor pretending to be a Cockney in order to get work, and who invented implausible-sounding rhyming slang phrases.

BORACIC: ‘“You boracic?” she asked.—She meant boracic lint–skint.’(Hank Hobson, ‘Mission House Murder,’ 1959)—that is, very short of money: rhyming slang circa 1945. Often pronounced ‘brassic.’ 2. ‘”Don’t give me the old boracic” = don’t tell be tall yarns, don’t try to get round me with smooth words. Also ‘Ackamaraka’ (Tempest) prisons’ and low slang: mid-20th century. Probably from smoothness of boracic ointment."

From
Wordwizard

So, I WAS completely wrong. Glad I do know its origin now, though!

Lou :)
 
I'd term them the fuckers and the fuckees.

Others, I call them the ones with too much time to waiste.
 
I'm certainly not rich and not even close to being "Mass Affluent" either but I am also not poor. I doubt if anybody in AH is actually poor, by international standards, since that is a relative term. I would describe myself as "getting by" which is probably what most of us are although some of us might actually be filthy rich and how would we know?

I think all groups have their own languages, such as Cockneys with their ryming slang or persons associated with major league baseball or musicians, or hookers or just about any other group you could name.
 
I'm working class. I look up to him. (And I look up to him). I know my place.
 
Back
Top