renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
Sadly, I haven now come to the resignation that feMANism has won. There are now no recognized social differences between men and women, and this WILL NOT BE REVERSED as I always simply assumed it would with a natural cultural pendulum swing. I had always felt that this idea of sameness between the sexes (not real inequality which is the femanist lie, but mere differentiation in any form) was simply unnatural and would eventually be replaced by a return to a recognition that there are fundamental and healthy naturally based difference between the sexes which manifest in various ways and should be embraced and reflected in benign ways in society for the benefit of both sexes and for civilization as a whole.
As of today, sadly, I no longer believe a reverse pendulum swing is possible. Things have probably now gone too far for that. Sooooo, the question that remains is what to do with the few remaining anomalies that still exist in the social sphere that promote or recognize differences between the sexes?
Specifically, perhaps the most obvious one, sexually segregated restrooms and other public facilities such as changing rooms or showers in high schools, public (or private) gyms, department stores, and even the military. On what rationale grounds can this sexually-based differentiation still be justified in this brave new world of unisex culture? Can this anomaly continue without being too obvious a form of hypocrisy? If so how or why?
As of today, sadly, I no longer believe a reverse pendulum swing is possible. Things have probably now gone too far for that. Sooooo, the question that remains is what to do with the few remaining anomalies that still exist in the social sphere that promote or recognize differences between the sexes?
Specifically, perhaps the most obvious one, sexually segregated restrooms and other public facilities such as changing rooms or showers in high schools, public (or private) gyms, department stores, and even the military. On what rationale grounds can this sexually-based differentiation still be justified in this brave new world of unisex culture? Can this anomaly continue without being too obvious a form of hypocrisy? If so how or why?