Are men the expendable gender?

Someone has to do the shit work and take the blame for everything.
 
if there are no men

how the fuck are woman gonna afford to buy nice shit?

after all, they are all useless without men

plus, who are women gonna blame for everything THEY fuck up?
 
if there are no men

how the fuck are woman gonna afford to buy nice shit?

after all, they are all useless without men

plus, who are women gonna blame for everything THEY fuck up?

Now that most women earn an income and are self-sufficient, men are good for only two things, BB.
 
#1
slayergirl69
Experienced

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 51

Are men the expendable gender?
http://40.media.tumblr.com/fa1d2e682...juwo1_1280.jpg Yes ;-)
slayergirl69 is offline Report Post Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

View Post Old Today, 09:16 AM
Remove user from ignore list
NOIRTRASH
This message is hidden because NOIRTRASH is on your ignore list.

View Post Old Today, 09:46 AM
Remove user from ignore list
smartjuanxxx
This message is hidden because smartjuanxxx is on your ignore list.

View Post Old Today, 10:50 AM
Remove user from ignore list
Aella_
This message is hidden because Aella_ is on your ignore list.

in the context of this thread so far it would appear so
 
#1

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 51

Are men the expendable gender?


in the context of this thread so far it would appear so

Huh? Why me? :confused::(
I was on the women's side, and I'm not a dood, dude.
 
Last edited:
Plus slayergirl is not "a female impersonator" either.:rolleyes:.
She's a millenial. And millenials are more open-minded, and they think differently than we jaded "old farts" (pun, not insult) do.
 
ObTopic: Yes. One man can service a large harem so most others are unnecessary, except to keep the winner(s) on his/their toes. Competition drives evolutionary success; only the strong survive, and reproduce. Weaklings are culled. The gene pool is cleansed. Hail Darwin!
 
Haha! Slayergirl is actually a quirky and smart poster.
She was alluding the other day to the contrast between the prevailing rhetorics in some of the movies that she's been watching:
The older generation: women need to be protected from men and abuse,
The younger generation movies : kick-ass empowered, self-sufficient heroines.

I never thought of these issues until she brought them up.
 
Haha! Slayergirl is actually a quirky and very smart poster.
She was alluding the other day to the contrast between the prevailing rhetorics in some of the movies that she's been watching:
The older generation: women need to be protected from men and abuse,
The younger generation movies : kick-ass empowered, self-sufficient heroines.

I never thought of these issues until she brought them up.

Imbecile.
 
ObTopic: Yes. One man can service a large harem so most others are unnecessary, except to keep the winner(s) on his/their toes. Competition drives evolutionary success; only the strong survive, and reproduce. Weaklings are culled. The gene pool is cleansed. Hail Darwin!

Men are not expendable even when considering Hypoxia's post. Genetic diversity is essential for the population. We aren't all Lannisters, ya know.
 
Plus slayergirl is not "a female impersonator" either.:rolleyes:.
She's a millenial. And millenials are more open-minded, and they think differently than we jaded "old farts" (pun, not insult) do.

I didn't catch anyone calling her a female impersonator. Link?
 
I didn't catch anyone calling her a female impersonator. Link?

there isn't a link. i quoted who was posting on the thread before me, and that showed the males as all being on my ignore list as well as showing slayergirl's name. it did not show slayergirl as being on ignore. the twat doesn't understand what i was posting. nuthin' new there.
 
the queen of pa doesn't pick it up when someone responds in kind. .:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top