That doesn’t change the fact that a group of Trump’s peers, that he had a hand in picking, found him guilty 34 times.That had to be adjudicated for a joke of a "crime" that was fabricated because it was such a joke nobody took it seirously.
"A judge said orange man BAD!!" Ohhh fucky doo.....LOL
you're just projecting again.
Cuck Asian CHAN is REEEEEE-tard.Because it throws sand into the gaping pussies of all the karens, every fuckin' time.
"STOP YELLING AT ME REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! WHITE MAN BAD!!! REEEEEE!!!" LOL
Why did Trump pick activists to be on his jury?Those are activist, not his peers.
That's why that case was laughed at by everyone who wasn't spazzing out over democracy not going their way.
Nobody is having a meltdown except the losers who got bitch slapped by DEMOOKRACY!!!!....
So now your argument has changed from Trump picked activists to Trump isn’t smart enough to stand trial. You need to make up your mind.
Let’s make things easy for you. Trump had a jury at his trial, correct?Nope. You're just engaging in wild ascription.
You're a triggered Karen having an argument with itself....LOL
Monday CHAN "big mad day".
Presumably yes.
Presumably yes or 100% yes?
Sure Karen.
I’m asking you a question. It’s either yes, no, or you don’t know. This is an incredibly simple question and you’re working incredibly hard to avoid it. Or, you honestly don’t know and if that’s the situation really shouldn’t be commenting on a situation you don’t know about.
^^^
No TRUMPER has any business calling anyone THAT!
No idiot on the left deserves an audience.
she set up girls for her husband to poop on, vetteman. you know you know this story
