Approval ratings...

[LilKitKat]

This isnt good for trump. I wonder how its spun on Fox, the Oval Office, etc?

https://www.facebook.com/therachelm...-unpopular-with-the-american/859779516432312/



further breakdowns on issues like
crime
foreign affairs
foreign trade
immigration
middle east
ukraine
the budget
healthcare


yikes

 

[Saint_Ann]

The only popularity contest that matters is the election.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Poor DonOld. The only thing that matters to him now than elections is his popularity.

Only a real fucking dumbass would think otherwise.

 

[Rightguide]

This isnt good for trump. I wonder how its spun on Fox, the Oval Office, etc?

https://www.facebook.com/therachelm...-unpopular-with-the-american/859779516432312/

View attachment 2581825

further breakdowns on issues like
crime
foreign affairs
foreign trade
immigration
middle east
ukraine
the budget
healthcare


yikes

So that was 1300 adults? Sounds like 2016 when Hillary was going to win by a landslide. So you're one of the 500 people who still listen to Rachel Maddow? What we need to see is a poll of Trump against any leading Democrat.

 

[DeluxAuto]

His ratings are tanking because he's a piece of shit liar and a handful of the MAGAts with a room temp IQ are getting "woke."

 

[DeluxAuto]

So that was 1300 adults? Sounds like 2016 when Hillary was going to win by a landslide. So you're one of the 500 people who still listen to Rachel Maddow? What we need to see is a poll of Trump against any leading Democrat.

You back on polls by 809 landlines in flyover States to octogenarians conducted by right wing propaganda outlets, Jack. Hush your hole.

 

[Saint_Ann]

What are Kamala's popularity ratings? It doesn't matter. Lol.

 

[JohnEngelman]

So that was 1300 adults? Sounds like 2016 when Hillary was going to win by a landslide. So you're one of the 500 people who still listen to Rachel Maddow? What we need to see is a poll of Trump against any leading Democrat.

I do not remember any polling agency that said Hillary would win by a landslide. They said she would win the popular vote, and she did.

 

[Bray123]

2016, Trump:62,984,828 votes. Hillary Clinton: 65,853,514 votes.

 

[Bray123]

A parody poster has managed to post this on the official Treasury Department site.

The chart shows raised returns due to raised interest rates on Treasury bonds, due to poor confidence in Trump's economic policies and his Beautiful Pork Bill.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1997053222419071068

 

[HisArpy]

Trump's approval is actually higher than his predecessors at this time during their terms.

It's even higher than it was during his 1st term (by 1%).

Somehow those FACTS didn't make it into the OP's opening post. No need to wonder why, just look at who made the thread.

 

[Rightguide]

What are Kamala's popularity ratings? It doesn't matter. Lol.

...and Walz has already committed political suicide.

 

[LilKitKat]

So that was 1300 adults? Sounds like 2016 when Hillary was going to win by a landslide. So you're one of the 500 people who still listen to Rachel Maddow? What we need to see is a poll of Trump against any leading Democrat.

1. Most polling is somewhere around 1000 people.
2. I realize you are likely exaggerating to try to make a point about the Emmy award winning, Peabody aweard winning, Grammy award winning, Stanford educated, Rhodes Scholar, Oxford educated, Doctorate Rachel Maddow who actually garners about 2 million viewers, but no I do not consistently watch or listen to her, but I do love her show.
3. Trump cant run in 2028 until he changes that in the Constitution or dies trying so who knows?

 

[Rightguide]

I do not remember any polling agency that said Hillary would win by a landslide. They said she would win the popular vote, and she did.

With all due respect, your memory needs an upgrade. Multiple major forecasting models did predict something close to a Clinton landslide in 2016. HuffPost Pollster gave Clinton a 98% chance of winning and projected an Electoral College blowout. Princeton Election Consortium (Sam Wang) gave her a >99% chance and predicted 320+ EVs. NYT Upshot put her odds above 85%, and for long stretches of 2016, national polling averages (e.g., FiveThirtyEight) showed Clinton with double-digit leads, which is landslide-level polling. So yes, many polling aggregators clearly implied a comfortable, near-landslide Clinton victory, far more than merely “she’ll win the popular vote,” which minimizes how wildly confident the forecasting establishment actually was.


Sources:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
https://election.princeton.edu/2016/11/07/final-snapshot-clinton-323-ev-99-percent/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
https://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/forecast/president

 

[LilKitKat]

Trump's approval is actually higher than his predecessors at this time during their terms.

It's even higher than it was during his 1st term (by 1%).

Somehow those FACTS didn't make it into the OP's opening post. No need to wonder why, just look at who made the thread.

I didnt make up the numbers, just sharing the facts, but sure pin it on me if it helps you feel good.

 

[Bray123]

https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin

 

[DeluxAuto]

Trump's approval is actually higher than his predecessors at this time during their terms.

It's even higher than it was during his 1st term (by 1%).

Somehow those FACTS didn't make it into the OP's opening post. No need to wonder why, just look at who made the thread.

Because it hurts his feelings, Derpy. More than half the country thinks he's fucking things up.

 

[Rightguide]

1. Most polling is somewhere around 1000 people.
2. I realize you are likely exaggerating to try to make a point about the Emmy award winning, Peabody aweard winning, Grammy award winning, Stanford educated, Rhodes Scholar, Oxford educated, Doctorate Rachel Maddow who actually garners about 2 million viewers, but no I do not consistently watch or listen to her, but I do love her show.
3. Trump cant run in 2028 until he changes that in the Constitution or dies trying so who knows?

...but in spite of all of that, she's wrong about everything, there is no bigger bullshitter on cable than Rachel Maddow. Here's a list of errors I managed to tease out of AI:
list

Notable Rachel Maddow Misses & Errors​

1. The 2012 Romney-Russia Tape "Bombshell"
   Maddow hyped an anonymous tip about a secret video of Mitt Romney making disparaging remarks about Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The video never surfaced, and the story fizzled.
2. "Trump-Russia Collusion" Reports
   Maddow extensively covered allegations of Trump-Russia collusion and often presented speculative or unverified claims as near-certainties. Many predicted outcomes, such as direct coordination proving impeachment-worthy crimes, never materialized.
3. The 2013 Government Shutdown Predictions
   Maddow forecasted catastrophic consequences from the GOP-led shutdown; while some impacts occurred, the tone was often alarmist compared to the eventual outcomes.
4. Election Night 2016 Projections
   Maddow called the 2016 election as “a landslide for Clinton,” reflecting the polling consensus, which proved wildly off as Trump won key swing states.
5. The "Benghazi Bombshell"
   Maddow downplayed or dismissed initial conservative allegations about Benghazi before later covering the controversy extensively, leading critics to accuse her of flip-flopping.
6. COVID-19 Early Coverage
   At times Maddow emphasized worst-case scenarios or misinterpreted evolving information, leading to alarmist tones that critics say stoked panic.
7. Election Fraud Claims Post-2020
   Maddow strongly rejected claims of widespread voter fraud, which aligned with available evidence, but some of her critics argue she dismissed concerns too broadly without nuance.

Let’s keep in mind, Rachel Maddow is a political commentator, not a journalist in the strictest sense. Her show is a cocktail of news, opinion with a generous splash of political bias. She’s one of the many overpaid reasons MSNBC is no more. If you want a clearer picture, you’d do better tuning into Ground News, that’s where folks actually go to become better-informed citizens instead of just getting their drumbeat of leftist narrative spin.

 

[icanhelp1]

Trump's approval is actually higher than his predecessors at this time during their terms.

It's even higher than it was during his 1st term (by 1%).

Somehow those FACTS didn't make it into the OP's opening post. No need to wonder why, just look at who made the thread.

I just saw a poll on FOX that substantiates your #

1% above both Obama and Biden during this same period of their admin.

 

[John_von_Neumann]

Trump's approval is actually higher than his predecessors at this time during their terms.

It's even higher than it was during his 1st term (by 1%).

Somehow those FACTS didn't make it into the OP's opening post. No need to wonder why, just look at who made the thread.

Oh FFS.

A comparison of his current quarterly average with the 19th quarters of other presidents elected for a second term finds that only Nixon (31.8%) had a worse rating than Trump.

 

[LilKitKat]

...but in spite of all of that, she's wrong about everything, there is no bigger bullshitter on cable than Rachel Maddow. Here's a list of errors I managed to tease out of AI:
list

Notable Rachel Maddow Misses & Errors​

1. The 2012 Romney-Russia Tape "Bombshell"
   Maddow hyped an anonymous tip about a secret video of Mitt Romney making disparaging remarks about Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The video never surfaced, and the story fizzled.
2. "Trump-Russia Collusion" Reports
   Maddow extensively covered allegations of Trump-Russia collusion and often presented speculative or unverified claims as near-certainties. Many predicted outcomes, such as direct coordination proving impeachment-worthy crimes, never materialized.
3. The 2013 Government Shutdown Predictions
   Maddow forecasted catastrophic consequences from the GOP-led shutdown; while some impacts occurred, the tone was often alarmist compared to the eventual outcomes.
4. Election Night 2016 Projections
   Maddow called the 2016 election as “a landslide for Clinton,” reflecting the polling consensus, which proved wildly off as Trump won key swing states.
5. The "Benghazi Bombshell"
   Maddow downplayed or dismissed initial conservative allegations about Benghazi before later covering the controversy extensively, leading critics to accuse her of flip-flopping.
6. COVID-19 Early Coverage
   At times Maddow emphasized worst-case scenarios or misinterpreted evolving information, leading to alarmist tones that critics say stoked panic.
7. Election Fraud Claims Post-2020
   Maddow strongly rejected claims of widespread voter fraud, which aligned with available evidence, but some of her critics argue she dismissed concerns too broadly without nuance.

Let’s keep in mind, Rachel Maddow is a political commentator, not a journalist in the strictest sense. Her show is a cocktail of news, opinion with a generous splash of political bias. She’s one of the many overpaid reasons MSNBC is no more. If you want a clearer picture, you’d do better tuning into Ground News, that’s where folks actually go to become better-informed citizens instead of just getting their drumbeat of leftist narrative spin.

Lets keep in mind, AI is not a good source at this time.

That said, has she made mistakes? I do not doubt she has or any of the ones you listed that AI conjured.
But all that said, has she been sued for lying to the tune of 787 million dollars?
Not yet to my knowledge...though I bet you could force an AI engine to spit it out for your narrative.

 

[LilKitKat]

I just saw a poll on FOX that substantiates your #

1% above both Obama and Biden during this same period of their admin.

now find one from a source thats more centrist

 

[JohnEngelman]

With all due respect, your memory needs an upgrade. Multiple major forecasting models did predict something close to a Clinton landslide in 2016. HuffPost Pollster gave Clinton a 98% chance of winning and projected an Electoral College blowout. Princeton Election Consortium (Sam Wang) gave her a >99% chance and predicted 320+ EVs. NYT Upshot put her odds above 85%, and for long stretches of 2016, national polling averages (e.g., FiveThirtyEight) showed Clinton with double-digit leads, which is landslide-level polling. So yes, many polling aggregators clearly implied a comfortable, near-landslide Clinton victory, far more than merely “she’ll win the popular vote,” which minimizes how wildly confident the forecasting establishment actually was.


Sources:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
https://election.princeton.edu/2016/11/07/final-snapshot-clinton-323-ev-99-percent/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
https://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/forecast/president

I clicked on each of those. The first two said nothing about the Electoral College. The third acknowledged, "A victory by Mr. Trump remains possible"

 

[icanhelp1]

now find one from a source thats more centrist

It wasn't a FOX poll... Real Clear Politics 42.9%

 

[schism666]

...but in spite of all of that, she's wrong about everything, there is no bigger bullshitter on cable than Rachel Maddow. Here's a list of errors I managed to tease out of AI:
list

Notable Rachel Maddow Misses & Errors​

1. The 2012 Romney-Russia Tape "Bombshell"
   Maddow hyped an anonymous tip about a secret video of Mitt Romney making disparaging remarks about Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The video never surfaced, and the story fizzled.
2. "Trump-Russia Collusion" Reports
   Maddow extensively covered allegations of Trump-Russia collusion and often presented speculative or unverified claims as near-certainties. Many predicted outcomes, such as direct coordination proving impeachment-worthy crimes, never materialized.
3. The 2013 Government Shutdown Predictions
   Maddow forecasted catastrophic consequences from the GOP-led shutdown; while some impacts occurred, the tone was often alarmist compared to the eventual outcomes.
4. Election Night 2016 Projections
   Maddow called the 2016 election as “a landslide for Clinton,” reflecting the polling consensus, which proved wildly off as Trump won key swing states.
5. The "Benghazi Bombshell"
   Maddow downplayed or dismissed initial conservative allegations about Benghazi before later covering the controversy extensively, leading critics to accuse her of flip-flopping.
6. COVID-19 Early Coverage
   At times Maddow emphasized worst-case scenarios or misinterpreted evolving information, leading to alarmist tones that critics say stoked panic.
7. Election Fraud Claims Post-2020
   Maddow strongly rejected claims of widespread voter fraud, which aligned with available evidence, but some of her critics argue she dismissed concerns too broadly without nuance.

Let’s keep in mind, Rachel Maddow is a political commentator, not a journalist in the strictest sense. Her show is a cocktail of news, opinion with a generous splash of political bias. She’s one of the many overpaid reasons MSNBC is no more. If you want a clearer picture, you’d do better tuning into Ground News, that’s where folks actually go to become better-informed citizens instead of just getting their drumbeat of leftist narrative spin.

do i need to link your az election fraud threads again, vetteman? ya fuckin simp.