Apparently the hacking was much more widespread than I realized

[about_average]

I haven't been following all of the minutiae of the Russian hacking, so I found this interview very interesting.

GREENE: And we spoke to a cybersecurity expert who initially doubted Russian involvement as well. Matt Tait is CEO of Capital Alpha Security, a British cybersecurity firm. I asked him why he was skeptical.

MATT TAIT: Well, it just seems too fantastical to be true. Russia has very good hackers. You know, this is a government agency. So initially what I did was I decided I'm going to go and prove Crowdstrike wrong.

http://www.npr.org/2017/01/04/50815...rt-is-convinced-russia-was-behind-dnc-hacking

 

[Lancecastor]

Trump had some guy on his campaign early on with alleged ties to some stinky stuff involving russia, shell companies and large sums of offbook cash.

I mention this because there's so much smoke around this story that the first people hidden from view may come back as the third act plot twist.

 

[about_average]

What's particularly interesting to me is that the reporting, in general, has talked as it there was only 1 or 2 paths with Russia as an endpoint.
The guy in the interview is saying he saw very many paths.