Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I find AOC completely abhorrent as a politician and as a human being, but yeah, I'd fuck the shit out of her. She just has that "fuck-me doll" look to her.
.........what turns you on more, a story about a politician you DON'T like, or about one you do? Is your attitude about this genre one of romance and attraction toward politicians you like or agree with, or a desire to see those you don't like or agree with humiliated or degraded?
Maybe stories of AOC and other sexy political figures (Example: Kaleigh McEnany) beings sluts or getting fucked rough.
Seems a good argument for not allowing real people into stories here.
Seems a good argument for not allowing real people into stories here.
Why?
Let's put sex and eroticism aside for a moment.
In America (I don't know what it's like in other countries) one is free to write satires and parodies and other fictional stories about real people. Andy Borowitz of The New Yorker does this all the time. It's totally legal to do so. Few, I think, consider it wrong or immoral to do so.
So why is it wrong if the angle of the story is sex?
Everyone knows it's not real. It's not libel, because it's libel only if someone might actually think it's real, and no reasonable person thinks the content of a Literotica story is real.
Porn videos are made with actresses portraying Sarah Palin ("Who's Nailin' Palin), Bill Clinton, and Elizabeth Warren. Again, everybody knows it's not real.
It's perfectly legitimate to criticize such stories as being in bad taste. But I don't think there's a good argument for "not allowing" such stories if they are perfectly legal.
This is a running argument with people like her about this issue. I got more than my share of grief about it not that long ago, despite my version of the celebrity inflicting it upon herself rather than having others do it to her.
The only US political erotica I'm interested in would be an alternative universe 2020 presidential race where Tulsi Gabbard, to make a point for some made up reason willingly stripped naked during television debates and effectively pledged to stay naked, and of course, she's ending up winning and becoming first permanently nude female POTUS. Yes, there's no direct sex at all in that story, but while effectively a parody, it must be told with completely straight face.
I'm anyway uncomfortable with living people being incorporated into people's sexual fantasies. Whether or not the celebrities read the stories, they are (or may become) aware of them.
It's different from television satire, where characters are exaggerated for effect. It's different even from porn, where the role play is - I guess - not too extreme. In both of these cases, there's an actor who clearly isn't the celebrity in question.
In written fiction, there is no actor. You are putting a real person into a character. The author and the readers become like puppet masters controlling that real person. Is it understood to be fiction? Yes - and no.
In erotic fiction, especially fiction driven by malice, it's a double drug of [sexual] arousal and physical power, one step removed from actual sexual assault.
So, no. I don't accept that it's harmless fiction. I don't care if it's Trump or AOC, though I despise one and love the other.
ETA: My phone really doesn't like me typing 'sexual'.
In hindsight, I think it's a good policy to not host that sort of thing on Literotica. Nobody's stopping someone from hosting it on their own website. I'm glad my story got rejected. It didn't age well, except for the Linsay Graham bit. And now one of the Koch bros would have to be rewritten as a zombie. Which would be an improvement.