Anti-white racists politicizing Buffalo local crime incident backfiring. Causing more people to see anti-white racism

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
The anti-white racist establishment has severely over-played its hand by its overt double standards and politicization of the supposed "white racist" incident in Buffalo.

You guys screwed the pooch on your entire shtick when you didn't even bother to condemn the obvious racial motive of the Waukesha black terrorist last Fall.

Nobody cares about your false narratives anymore. In fact the attacks on all white people in the media is hammering home the fact we are the actual victimized ethnic group today. I have never been more proud to be white than I am today. Having to put up with overt hate makes one rally round the gene pool so to speak.
 
Whites of European descent have created the most affluent, the most advanced, and the most humane civilization in history. Unfortunately, many whites have become too civilized. They cannot understand the mentalities of individuals and races that are less evolved than they are.
 
Whites of European descent have created the most affluent, the most advanced, and the most humane civilization in history. Unfortunately, many whites have become too civilized. They cannot understand the mentalities of individuals and races that are less evolved than they are.
With it's origins based on slavery, expropriation, and killing. Who started colonialism and imperialism?
You are a mansplaining bore, a pseudo intellectuall, a racist.
 
With it's origins based on slavery, expropriation, and killing. Who started colonialism and imperialism?
You are a mansplaining bore, a pseudo intellectuall, a racist.
Whites did not begin slavery. We did begin efforts to end it.

Civilization civilizes, but the process is evolutionary and requires many generations. Empires impose civilization on barbarians. The Roman Empire imposed civilization on the Celts. The Holy Roman Empire imposed civilization on the Germans. Europeans brought schools, hospitals, roads, and telephone communication to sub Saharan Africa. These have been disintegrating since the end of European colonialism in sub Saharan Africa.
 
The guy was a racist asshole. There's nothing anti-white about that. The real victims are the black people he targeted and killed.

You aren't the victim here and neither are any other "whites". All your tirade shows is that you seem to agree with the guy.
 
With it's origins based on slavery, expropriation, and killing. Who started colonialism and imperialism?
You are a mansplaining bore, a pseudo intellectuall, a racist.
Probably the Akkadian's.

Oh, and Western civilization should be known for ending slavery, they damn sure didn't start it.
 
RE imposed it's own version of civilisation based on slavery.
Colonialism is wrong in every circumstance.
Western civilisation did not end slavery, liberals and it's victims did.
 
RE imposed it's own version of civilisation based on slavery.
Colonialism is wrong in every circumstance.
Western civilisation did not end slavery, liberals and it's victims did.
White liberals ended slavery. Unfortunately, they are too forgiving of black crime.
 
White liberals ended slavery. Unfortunately, they are too forgiving of black crime.
The white liberals that ended slavery were classical liberals and have nothing in common with today's "progressive." The classical liberals are getting 'red pilled' daily.
 
You really don't know shit about the history of slavery or it's eventual ending.
"The American Civil War (April 12, 1861 – May 9, 1865; was a civil war in the United States between the Union (states that remained loyal to the federal union,or "the North") and the Confederacy (states that voted to secede, or "the South").[f] The central cause of the war was the status of slavery, especially the expansion of slavery into territories acquired as a result of the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican–American War.] On the eve of the Civil War in 1860, four million of the 32 million Americans (~13%) were enslaved black people, almost all in the South.["

Educate yourself, it's overdue.
 
My guess is that if you're playing the victim, then you fully buy into the horseshit that is "white replacement"
 
So the American civil war was't about the maintenance of slavery?

News to me.

What's your theory?
Slavery is as old as mankind itself. The role that the United States played in slavery was infinitesimally small in the sweep of history. A mere 71 years as far as slavery itself and an even shorter 15 years with regard to the slave trade. The US Civil War brought an end to slavery. If it were fought to preserve it, as you insist on asserting, then slavery would have lasted a lot longer. Mere semantic tricks like you are using doesn't change reality.
 
Slavery is as old as mankind itself. The role that the United States played in slavery was infinitesimally small in the sweep of history. A mere 71 years as far as slavery itself and an even shorter 15 years with regard to the slave trade. The US Civil War brought an end to slavery. If it were fought to preserve it, as you insist on asserting, then slavery would have lasted a lot longer. Mere semantic tricks like you are using doesn't change reality.
The role of slavery in our country as an aspect of the entirety of global history is irrelevant. Its impact on the short-lived history of the US is a completely different scale.

There were two sides of the civil war - one was seeking to end slavery while the other was seeking to preserve it.
 
The US Civil War brought an end to slavery. If it were fought to preserve it, as you insist on asserting, then slavery would have lasted a lot longer. Mere semantic tricks like you are using doesn't change reality.

How does providing you links to articles about the civil war amount to semantic trickery?

And yes the ACW did end slavery as the side wishing to continue it were defeated.

Or do you think both sides were fighting to end slavery?
 
How does providing you links to articles about the civil war amount to semantic trickery?

And yes the ACW did end slavery as the side wishing to continue it were defeated.

Or do you think both sides were fighting to end slavery?
That about sums it up then.
 
That about sums it up then.
The line "if it were fought to preserve it....." Is where we both have an issue. It was fought to preserve it, by the losing side. It wouldn't have been fought if they didn't wish to preserve it.
 
Starting multiple threads on this subject is definitely the way to convince people that these murders are a huge win for your side, in other words the side of the murderer.
 
The anti-white racist establishment has severely over-played its hand by its overt double standards and politicization of the supposed "white racist" incident in Buffalo.

You guys screwed the pooch on your entire shtick when you didn't even bother to condemn the obvious racial motive of the Waukesha black terrorist last Fall.

Nobody cares about your false narratives anymore. In fact the attacks on all white people in the media is hammering home the fact we are the actual victimized ethnic group today. I have never been more proud to be white than I am today. Having to put up with overt hate makes one rally round the gene pool so to speak.
Ah yes, whites are the true victims in this murder spree.

Arent you really old and almost dead? I sure hope so.
 
How does providing you links to articles about the civil war amount to semantic trickery?

And yes the ACW did end slavery as the side wishing to continue it were defeated.

Or do you think both sides were fighting to end slavery?
Dont argue facts with that idiot boomer. He is a history revisionist shit for brains baby killer.

Never trust anyone who would kill their own baby.
 
Back
Top