anti-semitism resolution passed by House, with only 1 republican dissenting and 8 others not voting

butters

High on a Hill
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
84,451
how is it so hard to call it out? massie, Kentucky... and 8 cowardly repugs who couldn't even bring themselves to vote

The resolution calls on elected officials, faith leaders and leaders in civil society to use their positions of authority “to condemn and combat any and all manifestations of antisemitism.”

The measure also urges individuals to denounce denials or distortions of the Holocaust, and encourages them to promote education focused on the Holocaust and antisemitism.
the point being made by the House is that too many people are hearing antisemitic words from people they trust and even admire. it's damaging on a broad level.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d8190d7f08c2422b9453f3b681077374
 
With an average IQ of 115 Ashkenazi Jews are the most superior race in existence. They deserve the best we have to offer. We need more Jews in the United States to take well paying jobs that require superior intelligence. Civilizations need brilliant people in charge.

 
Byron M. Roth, American Renaissance, November 2011

Richard Lynn, The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement, Washington Summit Publishers, 2011, 408 pp.

The Chosen People: A study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement is the most recent work of Richard Lynn dealing with group differences in IQ and their ramifications. As in all of his previous work over the past decade, he substantiates his arguments with huge quantities of empirical data. He advances his positions dispassionately and lets the facts speak for themselves, which they do in impressive, nearly irrefutable fashion. In his previous books he examined racial and ethnic differences in IQ for many groups. The Chosen People is a case study of one distinct group that has shown remarkably similar patterns of achievement in a wide variety of settings.

Professor Lynn begins by pointing out the extraordinary success of Jews in almost every field. In the 19th century the restrictions that had prevented most Jews from advanced nonreligious study began to be lifted in most of Western Europe, and by mid-century, “people began to observe that Jews were outstandingly successful, and began to speculate that this was attributable to their intellect.” (Unless otherwise noted, all quotations are from Professor Lynn.)

Prof. Lynn writes:
They arrived as penniless refugees unable to speak the languages of their new countries; they were the “huddled masses” from the most backward region of Europe. Yet by the middle decades of the 20th century, the children and grandchildren of these immigrants were doing far better than their Gentile hosts on all indices of socioeconomic status and earnings and outperforming them by several orders of magnitude in obtaining elite academic distinction . . . .
https://www.amren.com/features/2011/11/the-chosen-people/
 
I wouldn't have voted on it either but just because I think these resolutions are dumb and a waste of time and money.
"We are against hate!"
I mean fuck, that should be a given.
 
'should be a given', except, in the real world, it's not:
gop congressional candidate (Ca) raths' antisemitic outburst
“The Jewish community is very well organized in the United States and they control a lot of politicians. That’s why the foreign aid is so large going to Israel,” added Raths. “The Jewish community has never given me one dime, so I’m not beholden to them at all.”
the article explains:
“Israeli PAC” does not exist. Jewish control of politicians is an anti-Semitic trope. Control of politicians by the pro-Israel lobby is also an anti-Semitic trope as it is about those advocating or lobbying on behalf of the Jewish state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=50d5fa42a0344a458fb54f1e2b82e8ff
 
I wouldn't have voted on it either but just because I think these resolutions are dumb and a waste of time and money.
"We are against hate!"
I mean fuck, that should be a given.
Should be, but isn't these days, and you know it.
 
This is what the Koran says about the right of the Jews to Israel:

Surah V:20 And (remember) when Moses said unto his people: O my people! Remember Allah’s favor unto you, how he placed among you Prophets, and He made you kings, and gave you that (which) He gave not to any (other) creatures. O my people! Go into the holy land which Allah hath ordained for you. Turn not in flight, for surely ye turn back as losers.

Surah XVII:104 And we said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land, but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass, we shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

This is what the Bible has to say about the right of the Jews to the land of Israel:

Genesis 12:6-7 And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him.

Genesis 13:14-15 And the LORD said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward:For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.

Genesis 15:18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates.
 
Last edited:
pecksnif: One can be anti-Israeli without being antisemitic.

JohnEngelman: I have read the Old Testament in eight English translations. For Jews possession of the land of Israel is as important as personal salvation is for Christians.

That does not make it theirs by right.
The Land of Israel was given to the Children of Israel by God. The Occupied Territories were conquered by the Israeli Defense Force in a war started by the Arabs with the intention of destroying Israel. Israel has defeated the Arabs again and again because God is on their side.

IStandWithIsrael.jpg
 
how is it so hard to call it out? massie, Kentucky... and 8 cowardly repugs who couldn't even bring themselves to vote


the point being made by the House is that too many people are hearing antisemitic words from people they trust and even admire. it's damaging on a broad level.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=d8190d7f08c2422b9453f3b681077374
As usual, the article didn't contain his reasons for voting no and shame on you for not referring to the why of it all:

"I don’t hate anyone based on his or her ethnicity or religion. Legitimate government exists, in part, to punish those who commit unprovoked violence against others, but government can’t legislate thought.

This bill promoted internet censorship and violations of the 1st amendment."
 
Wow, someone never misses a chance to worship the Jewish people. Even if they were the smartest race on Earth, which is bullshit. Intelligence isn't the only thing of value in the world anyway. Its actually becoming increasingly unimportant for the average person.

There is no God, he cannot give you anything. The land was given to them by the allies because they felt guilty. And if God did give the land, then didn't he also take it away? Or is that not how it works? What's the problem with Iran having nukes. Doesn't God have the power to cause them to missfire or Israel to shoot them down?

This law should have passed with near 100% support and some dude who was sitting on the toilet and it didn't matter by the time he got back.
 
Wow, someone never misses a chance to worship the Jewish people. Even if they were the smartest race on Earth, which is bullshit. Intelligence isn't the only thing of value in the world anyway. Its actually becoming increasingly unimportant for the average person.
RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE ‘REVISED’ EDITION OF S. J. GOULD’S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3022 of whom were African-American), which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African-Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino-, White-, Asian-, and Jewish-Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

In an afterword to the softcover edition of The Bell Curve, Charles Murray (1996) chides Gould and his reviews for being hopelessly out of date regarding the evidence for the biological basis of g and for dismissing as ‘trivial’ the predictive power of IQ in The Bell Curve sample. Murray invites Gould to “count the ways” in which g does in fact capture “a real property in the head”. The higher the g loading of a subtest, the higher is its heritability, the higher the degree of inbreeding depression.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.543.2771&rep=rep1&type=pdf

------------

The Truth About Income Inequality in America, by Charles Murray​

The Atlantic, by Charles Murray

In the early 1990s, Bill Gates was asked what competitor worried him the most. Goldman Sachs, Gates answered. He explained: "Software is an IQ business. Microsoft must win the IQ war, or we won't have a future. I don't worry about Lotus or IBM, because the smartest guys would rather come to work for Microsoft. Our competitors for IQ are investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley." Gates's comment reflected a reality that has driven the formation of the new upper class: Over the last century, brains became much more valuable in the marketplace.

https://www.theatlantic.com/busines...th-about-income-inequality-in-america/252892/

------------

Computer technology increases the relationship between intelligence and income. As time goes on there will be more economic demand, and higher salaries, for those in the ninety ninth percentile, and less use for those to the left of the IQ ball curve.

BellCurve.jpg
 
I don't care about your racist bullshit that ignores all the other factors.
Factors like what? Affirmative action can get a low IQ black person into an intellectually demanding job. It can't enable him to perform adequately. His white and Oriental colleagues will notice his inferiority and resent his presence.
 
I don't care about your racist bullshit that ignores all the other factors.

A Conversation with Arthur Jensen

American Renaissance, August and September 1992

Professor Arthur Jensen of Berkeley: But the black population in this country is in a sense burdened by the large number of persons who are at a level of g that is no longer very relevant to a highly industrialized, technological society... These persons are not really educable up to a level for which there’s any economic demand. The question is, what do you do about them? They have higher birth-rates than the other end of the distribution.

People are shocked and disbelieving when you tell them that about one in four blacks in our population are in that category — below 75...

You see, the problem with relying entirely on education in these matters, is that these measures don’t get to the IQ group below 75.

https://www.amren.com/news/2012/10/arthur-jensen-has-died/
 
With an average IQ of 115 Ashkenazi Jews are the most superior race in existence.

Ladino speaking Sephardic Jews were the first Jews to inhabit what became the USA. Why do you think that they are racially inferior to the Ashkenazi's?
 
This sort of resolution does nothing except make politicians feel good.

For example, when I was working in London, the local council passed a resolution declaring itself a nuclear-free zone.

I had already written to the council pointing out that we had been using radioactive isotopes since the 1940s and we were flushing very low-level nuclear waste down the local sewers since then, with the permission of the sewage providers.

They also had two major hospitals within their borough, using radioactive treatments, and worst of all, twice a week trainloads of nuclear waste passed through.

But they wanted to make a statement, ignoring reality. It passed.
 
The Angled Turd exposes itself as 'Chosen'.

Anybody surprised?
 
Back
Top