Anti-drugs chief hits out at Winehouse, Moss

bluntforcemama

Aqua Vulva
Joined
Nov 11, 2000
Posts
30,225
LONDON, England (CNN) -- The United Nations' anti-drugs chief has denounced celebrities such as pop star Amy Winehouse and supermodel Kate Moss, saying that their alleged drug use was helping devastate West Africa.

"Coke-snorting fashionistas are not only damaging their noses and brains -- they are contributing to state failure on the other side of the world," wrote Antonio Maria Costa, the executive director of the UN's Office on Drugs and Crime.

The comments, published in an opinion piece in the British newspaper The Observer, was the second time in two weeks that the United Nations has criticized celebrity drug use.

A report last week by the International Narcotics Control Board said that drug laws should not be disproportionately applied. And letting celebrities get away with drug use creates a perception among youth that those offenders are treated leniently. Read about the earlier warning from the United Nations drug control agency

Costa, in his piece, said the cocaine used in Europe passes through impoverished countries in west Africa where governments haven't been able to mount an effective fight against the drug traders.

"In the 19th century, Europe's hunger for slaves devastated west Africa," he said. "Two hundred years later, its growing appetite for cocaine could do the same."

The drug trade, Costa said, has corrupted the governments of some countries, and created addicts in a continent where treatment facilities are rare.

"Amy Winehouse might adopt a defiant pose and slur her way through 'Rehab' (her Grammy Award-winning hit) but does she realize the message she sends to others who are vulnerable to addiction and who cannot afford expensive treatment?" he said.

Winehouse's battles with her addiction are well-documented. The singer -- whose song "Rehab" describes her reluctance to enter a rehabilitation center -- checked herself into one on January 24 after the leak of a home video that showed her smoking something in a glass pipe. What was in the pipe was unknown. Scotland Yard has said it is looking into the video.

Winehouse scooped up five statues at the Grammy Awards last month, including the best record and song of the year for "Rehab."

Winehouse's spokesman, Chris Goodman, called Costa a "ludicrous man."

"Amy has never given a quote about drugs or flaunted it in any way," Goodman told the newspaper. "She's had some problems and is trying to get better. The U.N. should get its own house in order."

Costa also took model Kate Moss to task, contrasting her alleged actions to those of singers Bob Geldof and Bono who have campaigned against poverty in Africa.

Bob Geldof is best known for organizing a series of benefit concerts, including Live Aid. Bono, the frontman for U2, has taken on a campaign to get Western nations to write off the debt they are owed by some African countries.

"For every rebel with a cause, there are 10 others without a clue," Costa wrote.

"While some well-meaning pop idols and film stars might rage against suffering in Africa, their work is being undermined by the drug habits of careless peer such as Kate Moss."

Three years ago, London's Daily Mirror newspaper printed photos it said showed the Moss using cocaine.

She later issued a statement where she apologized to "all the people I have let down" and said she took "full responsibility" for her actions.


I don't know why this cracks me up so much. I thought AIDS was the problem we were trying to fight. Jeez. Did we win that war?
 
Last edited:
Heh. I just think it's strange that he'd go after these fashionistas. Are there people who would really emulate that? It's so... retarded.

Yeah, true. But more importantly, the 'drugs are bad, let's fight them!' attitude has been proven quite useless and destructive, and any official who chooses to embrace it only shows how truly clueless he/she is.
 
Yeah, true. But more importantly, the 'drugs are bad, let's fight them!' attitude has been proven quite useless and destructive, and any official who chooses to embrace it only shows how truly clueless he/she is.

We can't really ignore the problem, though. I'm not sure what the answer is. Live and let live?
 
We can't really ignore the problem, though. I'm not sure what the answer is. Live and let live?

I'm certainly not denying that there is a problem. However, I also tend to believe that the 'war on drugs' mentality has had quite a terrible effect and has made the issue even worse.

Drug addiction and anything that comes with it are social and personal problems. Using force in order to eliminate them, like in many other similar cases, usually has a bigger potential to turn things for the worst. Education and prevention are key ideas, in my opinion. Instead of fencing drugs inside blasphemous territory, legalize them, teach people about their effects and how to use them moderately, and save millions of dollars and thousands of lives.

No one's going to stop doing drugs because you put them in jail. Well, it might work for a few, but in general, it's quite ineffective.
 
Heh. I just think it's strange that he'd go after these fashionistas. Are there people who would really emulate that? It's so... retarded.

I think there's a multitude of people who emulate them. Doesn't make this guy any less of a douche though.
 
We can't really ignore the problem, though. I'm not sure what the answer is. Live and let live?
There are a lot of possibilities for "The Answer" to substance abuse and each has some measure of credibility -- except for ONE "answer." The only answer we know does NOT work is Prohibition, both from the historical example of achohol Prohibtion in the 1920's and from the results of the current world-wide effort to suppress drugs.

"Live and Let Live" might not be any better as a world-wide drug prevention policy, but it is undeniably cheaper and less violent than the current situation.
 
The only answer we know does NOT work is Prohibition

Clearly, everyone doesn't know this, otherwise this absurd policy wouldn't still be in effect.

Or perhaps they do know it, yet insist on continuing to base their actions within the definition of insanity -- doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result.

Or maybe there are just too many entities that make money off the drug war. Our legal and penal system would be in financial crisis if drug cases were to go away.
 
From the Sunday times

High times with the UN’s star turns

In a very stern report, the United Nations lambasts Britain’s “celebrity cocaine culture”, suggesting that lenient sentences for famous drug users send the wrong message to young people. Poor, lovely Kate Moss should have been stripped of her lucrative contracts, a UN spokesman averred.

But Kate isn’t the only celeb to have dabbled. Angelina Jolie, for example, has been partial to the odd bit of smack and LSD: however, she has also warned that “those drugs can be dangerous if you don’t go into it positively”. Cheers, Ange, I’ll pass that advice on to the kiddies. Whoopi Goldberg was once a bit of a skaghead too, and partial to the occasional tab of acid. Robbie Williams, meanwhile, vacuumed up the GDP of Bolivia after Take That and was back in rehab last year trying to beat a prescription drugs habit.

What do all these people have in common, aside from being grade A celebrity monkeys? Yep, you’ve got it – they’re all UN goodwill ambassadors.

We snigger at the desperate antics of our drug-addled celebrities – which is better, I reckon, than indulging in them the notion that they might be able to rid the world of Aids, famine and poverty, in between the occasional snort.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/rod_liddle/article3511899.ece
 
Clearly, everyone doesn't know this, otherwise this absurd policy wouldn't still be in effect.

Or perhaps they do know it, yet insist on continuing to base their actions within the definition of insanity -- doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result.

Or maybe there are just too many entities that make money off the drug war. Our legal and penal system would be in financial crisis if drug cases were to go away.
As anyone if we should bring back Prihibition of alcohol and the majority will tell you that it's stupid idea because it's been tried and only led to increased profits for people like Al Capone. They don't seem to be able to make the connection that prohibition of drugs is doing exactly the same thing.

The ones who would be in favor of bringing back Prohibition fall into two general categories: Hopeless idealists who think passing laws will somehow change human behavior and criminals who see the profit in the return of bootlegging and moonshining.

Our (USA's) legal (judicial) and penal systems are already in financial crisis -- because of the War on Drugs. Law Enforcement is getting "all the money" but they're still chrinically short of money, too, because the the drug smugglers can outspend them two-to-one no matter how big the budgets get.

Eliminating the drug-related caseload would bring just about every court jurisdiction and 'correctional' facility immediately under budget by a large margin. Ambulance-chasers and other trial lawyers are against eliminating drug-related cases because one of the areas where drug-dealers outspend the forces of goodness and light is on lawyers.
 
the problem is , amy winehouse and pete doherty are seen in the public eye every day , totally wasted on heroin and apparantly above the law and immune from prosecution
pete doherty has just been voted hero of the year, for being a heroin addict with a good brief that keeps him out of jail
amy winehouse is in a worse meltdown than britney spears and is still on the street
 
Eliminating the drug-related caseload would bring just about every court jurisdiction and 'correctional' facility immediately under budget by a large margin.

Perhaps. I'm thinking more of the police units dedicated to chasing and nabbing drug violators suddenly being out of work because they no longer have people to arrest.

Ambulance-chasers and other trial lawyers are against eliminating drug-related cases because one of the areas where drug-dealers outspend the forces of goodness and light is on lawyers.

This is actually what I meant when I said 'legal system'. I should have been more clear.
 
the problem is , amy winehouse and pete doherty are seen in the public eye every day , totally wasted on heroin and apparantly above the law and immune from prosecution

I'm sure it's just the technicality of the fact that it's not actually illegal to get high or be seen high in public.

If they were to bust these people for possession or intent to distribute, we'd see some celebs actually do some real time.
 
Back
Top