And the "Hacks' go on

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
And why isn't the RNC being hacked? Or if it is, why aren't the hacks being dumped?

It's the Russians? No fucking way, they know they can buy Hillary.

Ishmael
 
I was just reading a series of links to "Hillary's Emails."

Some from the actual hack, some from the ones released by Judicial Watch after they had to pull teeth to get a paltry amount under court order, some released by The State Department. All at their corresponding release date.

The most interesting thing about the hacked emails is that it puts the lie to the FBI's statement that they cpuld not find convincing evidence that tge emails were deleted by Hillary, who served on the Watergate Commission, to obstruct jusice or avoid court orders, or congressional subpoenas. If that were true why is it that all the unflattering emails happened not to be in any of the above.
 
Whomever got and released those emails, be it the guy shot in the back or the Russians, has done us a favor in showing us just how corrupt the Clintons are and how complicit the Democrat Party is in simply looking the other way while dead broke goes to getting its membership in the $100 million dollar club through speeches to groups with business before the Secretary of State.

The people who could not let go of Scooter Libby, Melania's speech and one line of a Trump speech could give a rat's ass how much graft Hillary and Bill are involved in as long as they protect abortion, keep coming for guns and keep protecting the elite class from competition and criminal prosecution.
 
Whomever got and released those emails, be it the guy shot in the back or the Russians, has done us a favor in showing us just how corrupt the Clintons are and how complicit the Democrat Party is in simply looking the other way while dead broke goes to getting its membership in the $100 million dollar club through speeches to groups with business before the Secretary of State.

The people who could not let go of Scooter Libby, Melania's speech and one line of a Trump speech could give a rat's ass how much graft Hillary and Bill are involved in as long as they protect abortion, keep coming for guns and keep protecting the elite class from competition and criminal prosecution.

That is exactly the problem.. In the end those that will vote for Hillary don't give a flying fuck.

As long as they get theirs, the rest of the country be damned..
 
Its the NSA fucking Hillary for the emails.

We don't want the world to know the NSA can look at anything, and doesn't need Apple's help or the FBI. The NSA isn't happy with HRC's cavalier FUCK THEM attitude.

The word is the NSA will fuck HRC's fat ass close to the election.
 
Its the NSA fucking Hillary for the emails.

We don't want the world to know the NSA can look at anything, and doesn't need Apple's help or the FBI. The NSA isn't happy with HRC's cavalier FUCK THEM attitude.

The word is the NSA will fuck HRC's fat ass close to the election.

I googled it and indeed.
William Binney said that he believes that someone from inside the NSA might have leaked them.

"'She lifted the material that was in her emails directly from Gamma reporting.'
That is a direct compromise of the most sensitive material at the NSA. So she's got a real problem there.
So there are many people who have problems with what she has done in the past. There were a number of NSA officials complaining to the press ...
So I don't necessarily look at the Russians as the only [ones] who got into those emails",
 
I googled it and indeed.
William Binney said that he believes that someone from inside the NSA might have leaked them.

"'She lifted the material that was in her emails directly from Gamma reporting.'
That is a direct compromise of the most sensitive material at the NSA. So she's got a real problem there.
So there are many people who have problems with what she has done in the past. There were a number of NSA officials complaining to the press ...
So I don't necessarily look at the Russians as the only [ones] who got into those emails",

There are two problems.
Hacking is one problem. The content of the emails is the other problem. What we want to do is shoot the messenger not the email writer.
 
I was just reading a series of links to "Hillary's Emails."

Some from the actual hack, some from the ones released by Judicial Watch after they had to pull teeth to get a paltry amount under court order, some released by The State Department. All at their corresponding release date.

The most interesting thing about the hacked emails is that it puts the lie to the FBI's statement that they cpuld not find convincing evidence that tge emails were deleted by Hillary, who served on the Watergate Commission, to obstruct jusice or avoid court orders, or congressional subpoenas. If that were true why is it that all the unflattering emails happened not to be in any of the above.
Maybe you could post some actual links to the damning info, since google gives almost 450,000 results.
 
I googled it and indeed.
William Binney said that he believes that someone from inside the NSA might have leaked them.

"'She lifted the material that was in her emails directly from Gamma reporting.'
That is a direct compromise of the most sensitive material at the NSA. So she's got a real problem there.
So there are many people who have problems with what she has done in the past. There were a number of NSA officials complaining to the press ...
So I don't necessarily look at the Russians as the only [ones] who got into those emails",

In a bizarre way the NSA makes as much, or more, sense than any other explanation I've heard so far.

Ishmael
 
In a bizarre way the NSA makes as much, or more, sense than any other explanation I've heard so far.

Ishmael

Maybe my reasoning for this isn't the right one,
but I'm inclined too, to believe that it's an internal source, as opposed to a foreign power which is seen as being adversarial to the US.

Because certainly NSA and the relevant organizations have top computer experts who would be able to tell with approximation, where the leak came from. So they Would certainly know if it's Russia, or not.

Yet the fact that they are silent, so to speak; non-commital and aren't either accusing or exhonerating Russia, is strange to me.
What interest would they have to do that? Unless it's something that they don't want the public to know about.


Unless I missed some of the news and they're already did it.
 
Last edited:
In a bizarre way the NSA makes as much, or more, sense than any other explanation I've heard so far.

Ishmael

I tend to flow in the direction of its easier to capture flies with bribes and ready access to them than strangers going to lotsa trouble with butterfly nets that costs more than bribes.
 
Wow. Did you see what Trump said today?

"The media spreads lies about Trump! I don't care what he says! I'm voting for him anyway!"

**

Hmm, hacked emails. Dunno if I trust that they're legit, or trust their content.

"The media said it's 100% real evidence! How could you ignore it?! You're a traitor if you vote for her!!"

lol
:cool:
 
I've wondered about this phenomenon for some time and I think I've finally come to a realization what is displayed here. It's a gamblers addition. A gambler is addicted to a random reward system. In some games of chance there is some skill involved, but most of it is the randomness of lady luck. A gambler bets with the hope and belief that the next pull of the lever, the next hand of cards will be the winner. After a while the gambler begins to get superstitious. Because s/he was drinking a certain drink when the stars aligned, they then start to believe that if they drink that drink it will force the stars into alignment. After a while the belief in the superstition becomes so strong it takes over and becomes the focus rather then an end to a means.

So goes it here, random rewards and superstition. I believe a certain thing so I look for proof of that belief. I check every allegation and theory looking for my proof. Eventually, after hundreds of erroneous leads I find one that upholds my beliefs. Once I find that, then I can look back on all those other completely false
and misleading theories and declare them valid. When it's pointed out there is no facts or truth in those, all I have to do is point out the one out of a hundred I found that is true and does uphold my view point as proof they are all true. The belief that," since I found one grain of truth in this pile of theories, innuendo and opinion, then every last one is factual and true". Random rewards and superstition.


Comshaw
 
Last edited:
Pelosi was forced to change her cell phone after receiving numerous dick pictures from a individuals who only identified himself as "busybody".
 
That is exactly the problem.. In the end those that will vote for Hillary don't give a flying fuck.

As long as they get theirs, the rest of the country be damned..

The essence of mob rule.

The very people traumatized by lynching now seem to favor it...
 
I, for one, don't believe the Russians had a damn thing to do with the release of the emails.

Ishmael
 
I, for one, don't believe the Russians had a damn thing to do with the release of the emails.

Ishmael

To paraphrase another Litster:
russians are now the boogeymen of the left. (just like the Koch brothers, in a way)
 
That is exactly the problem.. In the end those that will vote for Hillary don't give a flying fuck.

As long as they get theirs, the rest of the country be damned..

True enough. Of course, pretty much the same thing can be said of Trump supporters. His insults, lack of touch with reality, and endless succession of lies doesn't mean a damn thing to them as long as he strokes their hatred just so....

ooooohhh...that feels so GOOD!

Feelings, nothing more than feelings....
 
They aren't hacks. Informants give the data to WikiLeaks.

That's why the DNC is bumping off all these staffers. They are trying to eliminate the sources.

Its got nothing to with Russia or hacking. The DNC/media just pulled the Russia thing out of its loose butt. Totally made up a ridiculous conspiracy theory about Russia.

Ecuador is the one hosting Assange and letting him operate, not Russia. Rusia has NOTHING to do with WikiLeaks. Its absurd, but the media won't even point that out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top