Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi all...
the data scientist in me wondered how my stats for posting a new story evolve.
Decided to write a simple Python script to track it.
Would be cool if this were part of the Lit dashboard.
Anyway, if you are interested, here you go...
yes. Agreed. There is lots that could be done. These are very good
suggestions!...
The problem was not the Python scripting or adding more analytics, it is the data collection. This was done by hand.
The Lit team has the actual data, so for them, it would be automatic from their DB.
I should mention, the python script didn't render correctly in my original post....
there needs to tab spacing all throughout (those that know, will see it immediately).
but it is straightforward.
thnx for your interest as well....I guess I am not the only freakkkky...
bye.bye...
Hi all...
the data scientist in me wondered how my stats for posting a new story evolve.
Decided to write a simple Python script to track it.
Would be cool if this were part of the Lit dashboard.
Anyway, if you are interested, here you go...
Nifty. Looks like the forum software is not showing your indents properly, even though when I quote your post I can see that you put them in.
If you really feel inspired, I'd love a script that automatically scrapes the site to update the CSV...
There are plenty of data nerds here, so your input is very welcome, even if we don't all share your script-writing skills.
I think it would be a terrific feature for the Site to offer graphic displays to authors of the data concerning their stories. Seems like it would be fairly easy to do from a technical standpoint.
I think that it’s too easy to overthink scores. It’s clear than only a small slice of readers vote in the first place. I get the impression that readers vote on how much they liked the story in general, without any major effort to delve deeply into analysis of characterization vs pls, etc. (I could be wrong there, for comments received sometimes do mention those.)
I myself rarely give any score other than a 5. If it’s a poor story, I generally don’t even finish reading it. Obviously, that’s not universal, but I’ve seen other people say that’s their practice.
The kicker of course are the omnipresent trolls, who routinely and apparently automatically one-bomb stories regardless of how good they are. Much of their bile gets washed away by the sweeps, but they still skew the scores to some degree.
With regard to comments on the usefulness of any analytics on these numbers:
just wanted to say, that I don't claim it is useful (too much). In fact,
I am not even sure what a "view" really means. Does it mean that somebody
opens your story sees it for a second and closes it?? I would be interested
to know what is the time between pages, do they get to the end.....etc
Isn't this something that every aspiring writer is interested in knowing?
To get right down to the "heat of the matter", I am not sure what
a "score" means. Was this score based upon a solid literary
criteria? Did plot development or character development enter into
the split second decision to press a "star-button" between 1-5?
Don't know. Probably don't care either.
It was just one of things that with a bit of evidence, one tries to
decipher.
I fear that this may reveal far more about the platform, than the
quality of literary erotica.
That error is easily solved.
On a terminal, type:
pip install pandas
Great!....
Look here.
https://www.anaconda.com/products/individual
You want to download this:
https://repo.anaconda.com/archive/Anaconda3-2020.02-Linux-x86_64.sh
when it is downloaded, do the following:
1) execute: "chmod +x Anaconda3-2020.02-Linux-x86_64.sh"
2) execute: "./Anaconda3-2020.02-Linux-x86_64.sh"
3) follow menu options
4) choose to install line in the .bash.sh file.
5) Open new terminal, you should have anaconda3 in your path.
6) optional: create virtual environments.
7) you are good to go with "pip" if needed.
![]()
A view is registered when someone downloads the first page. There's no time lag requirement. I checked that once with a script that opened an inactive story five times. The view count incremented by five.
The score is the average user rating. I keep a spreadsheet that tracks the votes, and the results are reproducible. The question I can't answer with certainty is whether the score cited is rounded to the nearest 1/100th, or whether it's rounded down or up.
The standards are whatever the reader applies, which is highly variable.
Some writers care about the stats. Some don't.