Anally raped to within a nanometre of my worthless little life.

JMohegan said:
Click me, too.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Quietly praying here that 'guinea pigs' isn't a euphemism for submissives in training.

Thank you for the prior compliments Mr Mohegan, last thing I expected to read, though most genuinely made me smile.
 
VelvetDarkness said:
Applies to Primalex though. Don't go mocking the afflicted, it only encourages them. :rolleyes:

I couldn't help it. Tho upon later consideration I took into account that maybe he considers "raising" a submissive like raising a child. :rolleyes:
 
the captians wench said:
the problem here is we are not talking about a child. The same psycology doesn't aply

Oh, hypocrisy in its best. It's fine if you use them as argument, but it's not, when others do it.
 
Last edited:
VelvetDarkness said:
For the record that was the only thing Primalex has said that I agree with.

Which is somehow funny. How can you disagree with a question?

"Do you like cars?"
"I don't agree with what you said!"
 
Primalex said:
Which is somehow funny. How can you disagree with a question?

"Do you like cars?"
"I don't agree with what you said!"

you can when its a rhetorical question I guess.

Just sayin
 
the captians wench said:
When did I ever use children as the arguement? :confused:

As you agreed to Netzachs comment, I think it's justified to assume that you supported what she wrote. But maybe you just did the traditional clapping for the boss. This is fine, too, I'm familiar with these dynamics and the power of virtual clucking hens in the online world.
 
Primalex said:
As you agreed to Netzachs comment, I think it's justified to assume that you supported what she wrote. But maybe you just did the traditional clapping for the boss. This is fine, too, I'm familiar with these dynamics and the power of virtual clucking hens in the online world.

:confused:

When netz used the "monster under the bed" example, she was saying that this is an adult situation and you can't aply child psycology to an adult psyci. Which is pretty much what I restated when you looked up child psycoligists to suport your arguement.

And because I showed a simular stance means that I am held accountable for everything Netz said before that moment? So if, by some act of God, I agree with something you say, then I'm to be understood as agreeing with everything?
 
Last edited:
Primalex said:
As you agreed to Netzachs comment, I think it's justified to assume that you supported what she wrote. But maybe you just did the traditional clapping for the boss. This is fine, too, I'm familiar with these dynamics and the power of virtual clucking hens in the online world.

Do clucking hens clap?

I'm familiar with the phenomenon of posters who see cabals--clucking, clapping, or otherwise--when more than one person disagrees with them.

In any case, back to the subject at hand. I very much appreciate Velvet Darkness posting what she did, and much of what was posted in response. Kink gets pretty damn complicated sometimes (not a newsflash, I know).
 
the captians wench said:
When netz used the "monster under the bed" example, she was saying that this is an adult situation and you can't aply child psycology to an adult psyci. Which is pretty much what I restated when you looked up child psycoligists to suport your arguement.

Rereading the comment, I agree.

But then I can even agree less with the comment itself, because confrontation is a well-known and effective treatment for adults. Then the only real disagreement can be the time of my questions: Is someone who is able to write lengthy articles in a forum still in a condition that requires group cuddling, especially if it is mentioned, those concerns exist already for a longer period of time and did not have the root in the latest incident? Maybe, maybe not. I think this is a hard call, isn't it?
 
Primalex said:
Which is somehow funny. How can you disagree with a question?

"Do you like cars?"
"I don't agree with what you said!"
Now you've lost me hon. If I remember rightly (being a dippy ickle guinea pig and all) you said (referring to Netzach):
Primalex said:
But hey, who cares about experts if there is your knowledge...
I said to Netz:
VelvetDarkness said:
For the record, this is the only thing Primalex said that I agree with.
(bold type added for emphasis)

So I believe that I did in fact agree with the question, in as much as you can agree with a query anyway.

I am better acquainted with Netz than with you on the board and agreed with her viewpoint over yours. As Lit is a haven of free expression I am perfectly within my rights to do that.

It's not like she's some scary ass Domme or anything... :eek:
...and even if she is, Netz is thousands of miles away from me so I really can say what I like.

Now don't you have anyone else to piss off? Anyone else would have taken the hint that their welcome was worn out 3 pages or so ago.

Have a nice day now :kiss:
 
Last edited:
Primalex said:
Is someone who is able to write lengthy articles in a forum still in a condition that requires group cuddling, especially if it is mentioned, those concerns exist already for a longer period of time and did not have the root in the latest incident? Maybe, maybe not. I think this is a hard call, isn't it?

Not really.

I never said that all my concerns were rooted in one incident. I merely wanted to discuss things with people who have had similar experiences and thoughts because I and Master are fairly new to kink as I have said before. That's the whole point of the forum, in case you missed it. If I want a hug I'll go to Master and ask for one nicely. He's never refused me yet.

Does someone who is so mean spirited and easily offended really think he's making a contribution by pissing on other people's conversations? Do you really imagine you have the intellecual high ground here? You insist on sticking your nose in here and posting your ten pence when you are under no illusions as to whether anyone values your input.

If someone says something on a thread (especially one that they have started) that I disagree with I'll give my opinion if I think it has merit but if they aren't interested I do the decent thing, fuck off and leave them to it. I don't continually wank over the spirit of the thread by harping on about my own dented ego and assert that everyone else is wrong. It's called being adult.

I have no further interest in posting with you Primalex. It takes a lot to get me hovering over the ignore key but you happen to be the third candidate since I signed up in May 2006. So congratulations.

Now fuck off outta here and ruin somebody else's day. Please.
 
Last edited:
Just for the record people, the last post I made that was on topic was #93.

I'd skip all the existential BS and start back there.
 
VelvetDarkness said:
Not really.

I never said that all my concerns were rooted in one incident.

Exactly what I said: "did not have the root in the latest incident"
You are angry because we say the same?

I merely wanted to discuss things with people who have had similar experiences and thoughts because I and Master are fairly new to kink as I have said before. That's the whole point of the forum, in case you missed it. If I want a hug I'll go to Master and ask for one nicely.

I assume this paragraph is for Netzach, because I actually tried to discuss things with you. Unfortunately it didn't get far, because of the interruptions of certain persons.
 
Last edited:
Netzach said:
I think it's more like tamogochi - those virtual pet things.
: chuckles :

Baaaaaaaaaad, exquisite, insightful, most likely 100% accurate but very very bad .

Shame on you !
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
: chuckles :

Baaaaaaaaaad, exquisite, insightful, most likely 100% accurate but very very bad .

Shame on you !

Not quite 100% accurate. Crucially, tamagochis die if you ignore them. :D
 
VelvetDarkness said:
And that's me hitting the ignore key. Ahh... :)

Silence.


Resist temptation...the ignore button only allows others to control you, though it gives the appearance it is the other way around. :rose:

Catalina :catroar:
 
catalina_francisco said:
Resist temptation...the ignore button only allows others to control you, though it gives the appearance it is the other way around. :rose:

Catalina :catroar:

I know. I already took it off so I could make sense of another thread. Was hoping the troll in question wouldn't find out though.

:p :p :p *Does an 'I hate trolls' dance* :p :p :p
 
VelvetDarkness said:
I think it comes from being somewhat isolated. Master has no interest in local events and others who say they have been indoctrinated into certain aspects of kink have had a slight advantage IMO. .

I know this probably will not be popular here, but I really do think there is too much focus and importance placed on going to clubs, parties, meetings, workshops, and meeting in RL public events like minded people in relation to living D/s. It is one option, especially for the socially minded, but at the end of the day what you do not only is your own business, but should be guided by both your needs, values, kinks, and desires, nor going out to meet others, compare notes and ask if they think you have got it right. I for one have never been indoctrinated in the public scene, nor attended such events, but I do not feel it has been detrimental to our journey or my happiness. There is a lot of fun and learning to be had in exploring and traveling your journey together, more so than having a bunch of people along for the ride and offering suggestions of how and when you should be doing everything. LOL, more than likely it would be more uncomfortable for me to be involved in public aspects as I find myself cringing at the thought of being nearly as revealing about personal aspects of myself or our lives which most here think nothing of posting about...my shyness and introverted nature is not maybe always a good thing.

Also, try not to get that upset with Primalex's comments as I honestly do not think they were meant to be upsetting but more thought provoking in response to your own questions. I know we all fall prey to mis-reading comments sometimes, especially if others are jumpiong up and down about it but until now I had not had time to read through the thread, but on doing so I think it was a matter of miscommunication/misreading the words and their meaning more so than blatent stupidity and baiting. Of course, I get it wrong enough times that I may be wrong this time also, just it didn't read for me the way most took it. :rose:

Catalina :catroar:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top