I'm transfering this from the "How to..." section onto the General Board (I hope this is okay). This board seems to get the most comments.
A brief synopsis:
A man posted his concerns regarding the suspicion that his wife was cheating on him. He gave several for-instances on what made him think this and also asked for opinions on what might be tell-tale signs of a cheating mate.
Gary1 made the following comment:
What is it with the jealousy thing. Jealousy is founded in ownership.
Damn ... since when do people own other people. A wedding contract is just a contract... it is not an ownership paper... it is not a paper of bondage or slavery. Jesus H. Christ ... grow up and get a life... If she comes home and you love her ... what the hell else do you want from a marriage. She came home... she came home for something...obviously you are not giving her something ... or she wouldn't be looking in all the wrong places for love. And even if you are ... last I checked ... freedom is still a guarantee in the good ole US of A. If she is lookin somewhere else ... let her look. But, quit this destructive game of ownership and trying to catch her at cheatin. Grow up and get on with life. Worry about something that is worth worrying about.
And get rid of the archaic ownership game.
My opinion is this:
I'm a bit disturbed by your comments, Gary1. Okay, perhaps *more* than a bit.
Marriage is just a contract? Yes, it is, in the extent that it's on a paper filed at a courthouse, but it's also a vow, before God, that people make to be faithful to each other. Forgive me if I sound corny, but I take such a vow seriously.
If an "open" marriage is what the couple wants, then let them be honest about it with each other. Sneaking around and cheating is
definitely wrong. Just because we live in such "modern" times is no excuse, in my humble opinion.
What can be more unfair than a marriage where one person takes the vow to mean something, and the other thinks it's just words to
disregard anytime they feel like it?
The ideas of marriage should be discussed before two people are married. If one partner expresses ideas that are similiar to yours, and the other has my ideas concerning what a marriage should be, then the two should not be married.
If a couple does this and comes to an agreement, and that agreement is broken, don't you think the slighted person has a reason for anger and hurt?
[This message has been edited by Rowan (edited 04-17-2000).]
A brief synopsis:
A man posted his concerns regarding the suspicion that his wife was cheating on him. He gave several for-instances on what made him think this and also asked for opinions on what might be tell-tale signs of a cheating mate.
Gary1 made the following comment:
What is it with the jealousy thing. Jealousy is founded in ownership.
Damn ... since when do people own other people. A wedding contract is just a contract... it is not an ownership paper... it is not a paper of bondage or slavery. Jesus H. Christ ... grow up and get a life... If she comes home and you love her ... what the hell else do you want from a marriage. She came home... she came home for something...obviously you are not giving her something ... or she wouldn't be looking in all the wrong places for love. And even if you are ... last I checked ... freedom is still a guarantee in the good ole US of A. If she is lookin somewhere else ... let her look. But, quit this destructive game of ownership and trying to catch her at cheatin. Grow up and get on with life. Worry about something that is worth worrying about.
And get rid of the archaic ownership game.
My opinion is this:
I'm a bit disturbed by your comments, Gary1. Okay, perhaps *more* than a bit.
Marriage is just a contract? Yes, it is, in the extent that it's on a paper filed at a courthouse, but it's also a vow, before God, that people make to be faithful to each other. Forgive me if I sound corny, but I take such a vow seriously.
If an "open" marriage is what the couple wants, then let them be honest about it with each other. Sneaking around and cheating is
definitely wrong. Just because we live in such "modern" times is no excuse, in my humble opinion.
What can be more unfair than a marriage where one person takes the vow to mean something, and the other thinks it's just words to
disregard anytime they feel like it?
The ideas of marriage should be discussed before two people are married. If one partner expresses ideas that are similiar to yours, and the other has my ideas concerning what a marriage should be, then the two should not be married.
If a couple does this and comes to an agreement, and that agreement is broken, don't you think the slighted person has a reason for anger and hurt?
[This message has been edited by Rowan (edited 04-17-2000).]