WickedEve
save an apple, eat eve
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2001
- Posts
- 11,470
Like all, or most, poets, I'm flooded with memories and stories that have been passed along to me. It is important for me to preserve these as accurately as possible. But I tend to alter the original for public consumption. I mean, what does the reader know? The reader knows only what I choose to reveal in my poetry. There are times that an altered poem flows more smoothly or may make better sense to a reader.
Here is my Looking Back Down the Road poem that is online here at literotica:
we are dust
and modern metal
past purgatory mountain,
through pear fields.
with calmer hollows,
we settle,
where boards
and swing rope
(just pieces)
stir reminiscence.
then down easy
windings
to terpin's:
come in.
buy
ham, honey
and apples.
I resist.
she remembers
smoking roadside butts,
with cherry boy,
on her way here,
when the way was still dirt.
we leave these roads, soft
beside knee-slapping grass,
and continue home.
And the original version:
we are dust
and modern metal,
past purgatory mountain,
through pear fields.
with calmer hollows,
we settle,
where boards
and swing rope
(just pieces)
stir reminiscence.
then down easy
windings
to terpine's:
come in.
buy
ham, honey
and apples.
I resist.
she remembers
picking up butts
(one puff left)
on her way here,
when the way was still dirt.
we journey on
to old oak--
it no longer talks.
see it over yonder,
bent silent near places
cherry boy sat
crippled?
there were vaccinations
that summer--
someone's needled backside
in local papers.
she smiles,
wondering if it was hers.
we leave these roads, soft
beside knee-slapping grass,
and continue home.
I do like the second version, but when the online version is read, it's moves along at a better pace, in my opinion. As you can see in the bold sections, there was a big chunk of words condensed and changed to make the poem cleaner and less of a cluttered read--again, that's my opinion.
I'm sure I'm not alone in doing this. Who else thinks altering the original can be beneficial before publishing it online?
Here is my Looking Back Down the Road poem that is online here at literotica:
we are dust
and modern metal
past purgatory mountain,
through pear fields.
with calmer hollows,
we settle,
where boards
and swing rope
(just pieces)
stir reminiscence.
then down easy
windings
to terpin's:
come in.
buy
ham, honey
and apples.
I resist.
she remembers
smoking roadside butts,
with cherry boy,
on her way here,
when the way was still dirt.
we leave these roads, soft
beside knee-slapping grass,
and continue home.
And the original version:
we are dust
and modern metal,
past purgatory mountain,
through pear fields.
with calmer hollows,
we settle,
where boards
and swing rope
(just pieces)
stir reminiscence.
then down easy
windings
to terpine's:
come in.
buy
ham, honey
and apples.
I resist.
she remembers
picking up butts
(one puff left)
on her way here,
when the way was still dirt.
we journey on
to old oak--
it no longer talks.
see it over yonder,
bent silent near places
cherry boy sat
crippled?
there were vaccinations
that summer--
someone's needled backside
in local papers.
she smiles,
wondering if it was hers.
we leave these roads, soft
beside knee-slapping grass,
and continue home.
I do like the second version, but when the online version is read, it's moves along at a better pace, in my opinion. As you can see in the bold sections, there was a big chunk of words condensed and changed to make the poem cleaner and less of a cluttered read--again, that's my opinion.
I'm sure I'm not alone in doing this. Who else thinks altering the original can be beneficial before publishing it online?