J
JAMESBJOHNSON
Guest
So I read the first ever Charles Willeford book, and it was excellent until the very end. I mean the last paragraph or so. And I wonder why he settled for a meh end rather than do better.
I mean, the end is plausible and common, but that's its fatal flaw. Most of his later books are redeemed by their endings.
I wonder how much effort writers put into their endings.
I mean, the end is plausible and common, but that's its fatal flaw. Most of his later books are redeemed by their endings.
I wonder how much effort writers put into their endings.