Alan Furst and character descriptions

Rumple Foreskin

The AH Patriarch
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Posts
11,109
Alan Furst has written a series of best-selling spy novels set in Europe before and during WW II. His protags have included a reporter/spy for Pravda, a Polish officer, the Dutch captain of a tramp steamer, and a dissolute Parisian filmmaker (Is there any other kind?).

One of the strengths of his novels is their gritty, unromactic realism and rich atmosphere. Just ‘cause I like his stuff and wanted to share it with the AH, here are the descriptions of a minor and major character from his recent book, Dark Voyage.

Even if “spy novels” aren’t your thing, check him out.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:

ps: I transribed this from an audio recording so could only guess ar some of the punctuation. rf

==

The desk clerk sat behind a wire cage, worry beads in one hand, a cigarette in the other, and beneath his tasseled fez, a mean eye. “Who the hell are you? She is not here,” he said.

==

Across the little table, she was much as he remembered her, though now he realized she was older than she was in his memory. No one would ever call her pretty, he thought, but you would look at her. A broad, determined forehead, high cheekbones, eyes a severe shade of green, almost harsh. A small mouth, down-curved, ready for anger or disappointment. Thick hair, a dull shade of brown, like brown smoke, swept across her forehead and pinned up in back.

She wore a pale gray suit and a dark gray shirt with a wide collar, shapeless and lax, as though worn for a long time, and carried a heavy leather purse on a shoulder strap.

But the detail that stood out, above everything else, was the presence of some inexpensive and very powerful scent—the sort of thing to use if you were unable to bathe.

He took out his packet of North States and offered her one.

“Yes, thank you,” she said.

Even in the cellar gloom of the coffee shop he could see shadows beneath her eyes. And when she held the small cigar to his match, her hand trembled.
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Alan Furst has written a series of best-selling spy novels set in Europe before and during WW II. His protags have included a reporter/spy for Pravda, a Polish officer, the Dutch captain of a tramp steamer, and a dissolute Parisian filmmaker (Is there any other kind?).

One of the strengths of his novels is their gritty, unromactic realism and rich atmosphere. Just ‘cause I like his stuff and wanted to share it with the AH, here are the descriptions of a minor and major character from his recent book, Dark Voyage.

Even if “spy novels” aren’t your thing, check him out.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:

ps: I transribed this from an audio recording so could only guess ar some of the punctuation. rf

==

The desk clerk sat behind a wire cage, worry beads in one hand, a cigarette in the other, and beneath his tasseled fez, a mean eye. “Who the hell are you? She is not here,” he said.

==

Across the little table, she was much as he remembered her, though now he realized she was older than she was in his memory. No one would ever call her pretty, he thought, but you would look at her. A broad, determined forehead, high cheekbones, eyes a severe shade of green, almost harsh. A small mouth, down-curved, ready for anger or disappointment. Thick hair, a dull shade of brown, like brown smoke, swept across her forehead and pinned up in back.

She wore a pale gray suit and a dark gray shirt with a wide collar, shapeless and lax, as though worn for a long time, and carried a heavy leather purse on a shoulder strap.

But the detail that stood out, above everything else, was the presence of some inexpensive and very powerful scent—the sort of thing to use if you were unable to bathe.

He took out his packet of North States and offered her one.

“Yes, thank you,” she said.

Even in the cellar gloom of the coffee shop he could see shadows beneath her eyes. And when she held the small cigar to his match, her hand trembled.


Thanks for the share, Rump! :D

I'm a big Raymond Chandler fan, and he sort of set the standard for the hard boiled detective genre and the snappy descriptions of characters. I can't read anyone else in the genre without seeing Chandler in the shadows :D
 
malachiteink said:
Thanks for the share, Rump! :D

I'm a big Raymond Chandler fan, and he sort of set the standard for the hard boiled detective genre and the snappy descriptions of characters. I can't read anyone else in the genre without seeing Chandler in the shadows :D
Anyone who likes Chandler will probably like Furst. There are a lot of similarities in mood and style between the two.

If you get a chance to read one of Furst's novels, please let me know, one RC fan to another, what you think.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Thanks, I'll have to check him out. I took a great course in detective fiction in college as an elective but he didn't come up. As a librarian I've read a ton since then but he still hasn't come up. There's just too many books out there for me to do anything but read for the rest of my life. *sigh*
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Anyone who likes Chandler will probably like Furst. There are a lot of similarities in mood and style between the two.

If you get a chance to read one of Furst's novels, please let me know, one RC fan to another, what you think.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:


I'll stick him on my wishlist :)
 
Excellent descriptions, don't know about the dialogue.

A personal thing but, I'm not enamoured of Yanqui phraseology: 'pinned up in back' or 'purse on a shoulder strap'.

Apart from that I wish I'd written it.
 
gauchecritic said:
Excellent descriptions, don't know about the dialogue.

A personal thing but, I'm not enamoured of Yanqui phraseology: 'pinned up in back' or 'purse on a shoulder strap'.

Apart from that I wish I'd written it.
Furst is an American but lived in France for years. So I don't know if the usage was intentional or not. Just out of curiosity, what would be the "non-Yanqui" version of those phrases?

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
'pinned up at the back.'

'a handbag'*



*(This phrase spoken alone with sliding vowels and falsetto is almost guaranteed to bring a smile to most Brit's faces*)

*(most Brits* being those that are familiar with the film version of The Importance of Being Earnest)

*(and possibly the horsey too.)
 
The death of Mickey Spillane brings to mind his method of describing a character. This is Velda, the secretary of his protag, Mike Hammer.

"There wasn't any kitten-softness about her now. She was big and she was lovely, with the kind of curves that made you want to turn around and have another look. The lush fullness of her lips had tightened into the faintest kind of snarl and her eyes were the carnivorous eyes you could expect to see in the jungle watching you from behind a clump of bushes."

==

Gauche: Thanks for the info.

A couple more questions. Is there a UK usage difference between "handbag" and "purse?" Number two: To this US guy, "purse" and "handbag" are virtually synonymous. Unless I'm even more out-of-step with the times than usual, isn't there a fair chance using "handbag" instead of "purse on a shoulder strap" might not convey the right image to US readers?

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Last edited:
Rumple Foreskin said:
Anyone who likes Chandler will probably like Furst. There are a lot of similarities in mood and style between the two.

If you get a chance to read one of Furst's novels, please let me know, one RC fan to another, what you think.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
I love Furst. My favorite is Kingdom of Shadows. With the Hungarians. Brilliant stuff, and meticulously researched as to the historical background.
 
cantdog said:
I love Furst. My favorite is Kingdom of Shadows. With the Hungarians. Brilliant stuff, and meticulously researched as to the historical background.
Cantdog, I always knew you had impeccable taste. :)

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Gauche: Thanks for the info.

A couple more questions. Is there a UK usage difference between "handbag" and "purse?" Number two: To this US guy, "purse" and "handbag" are virtually synonymous. Unless I'm even more out-of-step with the times than usual, isn't there a fair chance using "handbag" instead of "purse on a shoulder strap" might not convey the right image to US readers?

Rumple Foreskin :cool:

For U.S readers it seems just fine Rump, my comment was purely personal preference. If I hear a character use those phrases I know they're American but if I see them written down it's just not proper English.

In the UK a purse and a handbag are two seperate itmes. Even though modernly women can buy handbags over here that are the size of a purse, but because they have a shoulder strap they are a handbag.

Basically a 'purse' has no strap and contains mainly cash and cards (receipts, lottery tickets, scraps of paper, shopping lists, cards retained from flower delivery with personal message, photographs, payment slips...) whereas a 'handbag' has a strap and contains: a 'purse', floating change, handkerchief, lippy, mascara, tampons, keys, scissors, pens, wd40, tissues, toilet roll, sunglasses, sunblock, safety pins, cigarettes, mp3 player, lighter and matches, Preperation H, hairbrush, hairspray, paperclips, 5 and 30 amp fuses, most recent holiday snaps, mobile, spare knickers, two pairs of cheap headphones, cuttings from the local newspaper and lip balm amongst other things.
 
Furst's structure is idiosyncratic, too. His stories read like a novella, in that he is mainly concerned to convey the protagonist's personality to the reader, as it is challenged in the plot's tangled situations. He seldom has the protagonist resolve the situation, but rather has him resolve his personal dilemmas as they are teased out by that situation.


But unlike Chandler he evokes a historical gestalt. His WW II is the personal WW II as those who had to live in it experienced it. And his history is the real thing. He really does know the era. He doesn't bludgeon you with his erudition about the era, but it's not made up. And his writing just gets better as he goes.
 
cantdog said:
Furst's structure is idiosyncratic, too. His stories read like a novella, in that he is mainly concerned to convey the protagonist's personality to the reader, as it is challenged in the plot's tangled situations. He seldom has the protagonist resolve the situation, but rather has him resolve his personal dilemmas as they are teased out by that situation.


But unlike Chandler he evokes a historical gestalt. His WW II is the personal WW II as those who had to live in it experienced it. And his history is the real thing. He really does know the era. He doesn't bludgeon you with his erudition about the era, but it's not made up. And his writing just gets better as he goes.
I agree on both points.

Also, his writing seems to get tighter with each novel.

Gauche: have you been going through my wife's, uh, handbag?

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Back
Top