Afrikaner community under assault in South Africa

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
Effort to eliminate one of the last two Afrikaner villages in South Africa have begun:

KBK spokeswoman Marisa Haasbroek said: "This transaction was conducted by a separate financial institution, a cooperative bank called KSKK, not [KBK]. I cannot comment on behalf of KSKK."

KSKK stands for Kleinfontein Spaar en Krediet Koöperasie and its website says it is a deposit-taking financial institution owned by its shareholders. They could not be reached for comment at the time of going to press.

Legal expert Malose Matsaung says the owners of the settlement are hiding behind the constitution.

"Kleinfontein residents cannot discriminate against Mr Shabalala on the basis of his race, ethnic origin, culture and so on unless they can prove their discrimination is fair. Such fairness can only be determined by the [courts]."

http://www.sundayworld.co.za/news/2013/06/02/the-plot-thickens-black-man-kicked-out-of-kleinfontein
 
There are only two settlements anywhere in the world that are entirely populated by white Afrikaners. Both of them have less than 2,000 residents. Why would the "powers that be" even care? How can the tiny Kleinfontein and the slightly larger Orania settlements cause anyone any harm? Real tolerance would simply let them be as they aren't hurting anyone.
 
The guy talk s about tolerance. :rolleyes:

You're an idiot, renard.

You're always gaining on vettebitch.
 
Effort to eliminate one of the last two Afrikaner villages in South Africa have begun:

so they're under assault... because a consumer bought property legally, and then the owners trying doing a run around the law to forbid him from owning the property he purchased?

fuck, you're stupid
 
There are only two settlements anywhere in the world that are entirely populated by white Afrikaners. Both of them have less than 2,000 residents. Why would the "powers that be" even care? How can the tiny Kleinfontein and the slightly larger Orania settlements cause anyone any harm? Real tolerance would simply let them be as they aren't hurting anyone.

you mean like letting the guy that bought the house being allowed to move into it?

real tolerance would simply be let him be as he isnt hurting anyone
 
What a surprise, Rory wants to commit genocide on Afrikaners. They can't even have a few villages for themselves. What a nice human being, "Rory" is.
 
What a surprise, Rory wants to commit genocide on Afrikaners. They can't even have a few villages for themselves. What a nice human being, "Rory" is.

Allowing more than one kind of person into a neighborhood != genocide.
 
Allowing more than one kind of person into a neighborhood != genocide.

When you look at the totality of the circumstances in this case, yes. The settlement was created with the aim of allowing a small minority group to survive in some measure. Mr. Shabalala can live anywhere else he wishes, but is deliberately trying to change the nature of the settlement. Its a private community which was started for a specific purpose, that is helping a belegered and dwindling minority group have a small place for itself.
 
When you look at the totality of the circumstances in this case, yes. The settlement was created with the aim of allowing a small minority group to survive in some measure. Mr. Shabalala can live anywhere else he wishes, but is deliberately trying to change the nature of the settlement. Its a private community which was started for a specific purpose, that is helping a belegered and dwindling minority group have a small place for itself.

There are Afrikaners all over SA, they're hardly an endangered species.
 
When you look at the totality of the circumstances in this case, yes. The settlement was created with the aim of allowing a small minority group to survive in some measure. Mr. Shabalala can live anywhere else he wishes, but is deliberately trying to change the nature of the settlement. Its a private community which was started for a specific purpose, that is helping a belegered and dwindling minority group have a small place for itself.

One... they are not a minority.. they are everywhere in South Africa

Two.. they dont allow anyone but Afrikanners into their enclave... not black, not asian, not jew, not Roman catholic, not non afrikanner speaker

three.. if this had been a group that was any other colour than white.. you'd be throwing a fit
 
Reminder you of a particular GB poster, anyone?

"Opportunistic, intolerant, bad-mannered and bossy." That was how the leadership of the Afrikaner-only community of Kleinfontein, Pretoria, described the DA Youth during its protest outside the enclave yesterday.

Settlement resident and board member Danie de Beer said the news that the DA's youth wing would march on Kleinfontein had been disconcerting and there was some fear in the community.

He said the DA wanted media attention to drum up support for next year's elections. "They accused us of being racist. I found them bossy and bad-mannered."

http://www.timeslive.co.za/thetimes/2013/05/24/kleinfontein-s-top-brass-find-da-youth-bad-mannered
 
Last edited:
There are Afrikaners all over SA, they're hardly an endangered species.

Yes, they are over the longterm. These people have a human right to live the way they wish. The DA, the historically white "liberal" party, is the one stirring this up. The one thing these beleaguered communities have going for them is that they have a semi-positive relationship with the ANC. The DA is a pathetic joke of a party with less than 20% support. They are trying to play on black hatred of Boers to expand beyond their white electoral base and using a small, controversial group of scapegoats to do it.
 
Back
Top