champagne1982
Dangerous Liaison
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2002
- Posts
- 7,672
I have noticed that dominants, maitres and/or sadists seem to be very reluctant to accept critique at face value. Apparently, once they have swallowed their every tendency to be self-reliant and asked for critique or review, they seem to prefer to receive the shallow pats on the back that they consider their droit du sang.
I know I'm being presumptive, but what the hell?
So, when these poets receive a less-than-glowing comment on their poem(s) I have found that, sometimes, they begin to personalize the criticism and react as if the reviewer had commented unfavourably about them and not on the poetry they'd asked about.
I guess, the point to what I'm saying is, is that no one can deny anyone else their opinion but you can ask for it to be kept private. Beware though, once you've asked, publicly, for those opinions, you should be ready to get all kinds. Some of them may be the truth.
I know I'm being presumptive, but what the hell?
So, when these poets receive a less-than-glowing comment on their poem(s) I have found that, sometimes, they begin to personalize the criticism and react as if the reviewer had commented unfavourably about them and not on the poetry they'd asked about.
I guess, the point to what I'm saying is, is that no one can deny anyone else their opinion but you can ask for it to be kept private. Beware though, once you've asked, publicly, for those opinions, you should be ready to get all kinds. Some of them may be the truth.
Last edited:
