About That Border Wall...

Israel is also a smaller country.

Walls haven't been particularly relevant in decades if we're being honest.

No one has legitimately tried in decades.

You can secure the fuck out of a boarder....just a matter of will power and or money. Which is also the reason they are a temporary measure not a long term solution.

Point is M'uricuh doesn't have it in them to put troops on the border and gun down anyone trying to pass illegally. The bleeding hearts would fucking lose their shit.
 
No one has legitimately tried in decades.

You can secure the fuck out of a boarder....just a matter of will power and or money. Which is also the reason they are a temporary measure not a long term solution.

Point is M'uricuh doesn't have it in them to put troops on the border and gun down anyone trying to pass illegally. The bleeding hearts would fucking lose their shit.

Because it's a bad idea. It's the same reason nobody has legit tried capitalism in. . .recorded history. And it's because once you get enough people together to have a system at least a few know why this is just slightly smarter than using your pants as a hat.

No, you cannot secure a border. It's simply not possible. You can make an argument that you can get it down to an "acceptable rate" but you can't secure it. And what an acceptable rate it is, is ultimately measured by when do you hit the rate of diminishing returns?

I'll take the title of bleeding heart on this one. Jobs in my country are not so scarce that I'm going to be okay with gunning down people who cross the border. Get back to me when we're in a Depression and people are starving in the streets.
 
Because it's a bad idea. It's the same reason nobody has legit tried capitalism in. . .recorded history. And it's because once you get enough people together to have a system at least a few know why this is just slightly smarter than using your pants as a hat.

It's a good one if you want a sudden stop to people just strolling into the country.

No, you cannot secure a border. It's simply not possible. You can make an argument that you can get it down to an "acceptable rate" but you can't secure it. And what an acceptable rate it is, is ultimately measured by when do you hit the rate of diminishing returns?

A well guarded/wired wall is about as close as it gets.

I'll take the title of bleeding heart on this one. Jobs in my country are not so scarce that I'm going to be okay with gunning down people who cross the border. Get back to me when we're in a Depression and people are starving in the streets.

Doesn't matter....the GOP wills spend the money on a boss ass wall...then just let them walk bye anyhow because M'uricuh is full of fucking pussies.

Point being we can't even exicute a bad plan....we're going to half ass it, making it a huge waste of time/money when had we been serious, the only meaningful number of illegal immigrants crossing the borders would be ones with expired visas/passports. The runners/smuggling bit? That shit would be reduced to hardly ever and they would likely be chinese folks in containers on boats, not Jose breaching the worlds most advanced/deadliest fucking DMZ EVER created.

By the time the people are starving....too god damn late.
 
Last edited:
In order

People are not just 'strolling' into the country. Bitches are dying in the desert trying to get here. And 40% come in legally and don't leave so nearly half the problem gives zero shits about a wall.

Yes a guarded wall is about as close as it gets. However I was talking about diminishing returns. I could (if I had the money) hire enough guards to stand shoulder to shoulder around my house preventing robbers, possums and black widows. However I've had one break in during my entire life, three possums (one that was friends with my cat. It was terrible I'd feed her and once she finished she'd call the possum to eat the rest of her food!) and while black widows surround my house none have ever entered nor bit me (but one bit one of my iguanas I think.) The money I would spend on those guards would dwarf the money I've lost otherwise and would quickly dwarf the value of everything I own.

Finally this is a plan that we shouldn't do and if we do anybody who is half assing it is at least saving us the money from going full bore retard.
 
In order

People are not just 'strolling' into the country. Bitches are dying in the desert trying to get here. And 40% come in legally and don't leave so nearly half the problem gives zero shits about a wall.

Most of that 60% are just strolling in, that is to say they are on foot.

So other than the vietnamese/chinese shipping containers full of teen girls that hit LA/Oakland every day a wall would be a great deterrent.

Yes a guarded wall is about as close as it gets. However I was talking about diminishing returns. I could (if I had the money) hire enough guards to stand shoulder to shoulder around my house preventing robbers, possums and black widows. However I've had one break in during my entire life, three possums (one that was friends with my cat. It was terrible I'd feed her and once she finished she'd call the possum to eat the rest of her food!) and while black widows surround my house none have ever entered nor bit me (but one bit one of my iguanas I think.) The money I would spend on those guards would dwarf the money I've lost otherwise and would quickly dwarf the value of everything I own.

Finally this is a plan that we shouldn't do and if we do anybody who is half assing it is at least saving us the money from going full bore retard.

Yes I agree it's an economically unsound and about as 'cut your nose off' as it gets. Even said as much. But it doesn't mean a wall doesn't work or it is totally ineffective.

That's no fun though...it would be much more so to watch rich white guys freak out when the lawn is no longer getting mowed.....the food no longer harvested.
 
Again, A wall won't work. There are TWO borders.

Station the USMC /NG along the southern border and 4 divisions of the Army on the northern border with standing orders to treat anyone not getting in line at the border control station as a hostile threat to the US.

1 mile DMZ, mined to high hell, rifleman every 300m with all the cool guy toys. Re-enforced concrete 30ft high walls, covered with layer of C wire that's buried 100 feet down.

I promise you RJ.... immigrants would no longer simply walk into our country.


Cost effective with a real reason behind it? Not at all.

But " A wall won't work" is a a load of shit....a wall can work...a wall can work very well.
 
Last edited:
^^ Cosigning that.
Most of that 60% are just strolling in, that is to say they are on foot.

So other than the vietnamese/chinese shipping containers full of teen girls that hit LA/Oakland every day a wall would be a great deterrent.

Yes I agree it's an economically unsound and about as 'cut your nose off' as it gets. Even said as much. But it doesn't mean a wall doesn't work or it is totally ineffective.

That's no fun though...it would be much more so to watch rich white guys freak out when the lawn is no longer getting mowed.....the food no longer harvested.

Except that's not true. 60% are getting in sure but they aren't strolling/ON FOOT. Some of them are as you point out Asians coming in by boat. Some are Cubans swimming (hey it's clearly possible) or taking boats. Some are on planes, some use tunnels. Some of them are in cars. I'm sure you've seen pictures of how they hollow out parts of cars and sneak people in. We have no accurate way of guaging that but for shits and giggles lets assume 10% are smart enough to get clever.

Again, A wall won't work. There are TWO borders.

There is one border no matter how you slice it.
 
^^ Cosigning that.


Except that's not true. 60% are getting in sure but they aren't strolling/ON FOOT. Some of them are as you point out Asians coming in by boat. Some are Cubans swimming (hey it's clearly possible) or taking boats. Some are on planes, some use tunnels. Some of them are in cars. I'm sure you've seen pictures of how they hollow out parts of cars and sneak people in. We have no accurate way of guaging that but for shits and giggles lets assume 10% are smart enough to get clever.



There is one border no matter how you slice it.

I don't know about you, but there's one with Canada! It's there, and that's where the "white" illegals, the "students" whose visas expire come from.

NOT all illegals are brown!
 
Station the USMC /NG along the southern border and 4 divisions of the Army on the northern border with standing orders to treat anyone not getting in line at the border control station as a hostile threat to the US.

1 mile DMZ, mined to high hell, rifleman every 300m with all the cool guy toys. Re-enforced concrete 30ft high walls, covered with layer of C wire that's buried 100 feet down.

I promise you RJ.... immigrants would no longer simply walk into our country.


Cost effective with a real reason behind it? Not at all.

But " A wall won't work" is a a load of shit....a wall can work...a wall can work very well.

Ask China how there's worked!
 
And Botany, who in the fuck are we going to pay for it? Cut the largest part of the budget, DEFENSE, to do it?
 
Ask China how there's worked!

Even 2000 years ago it worked quite well. It wasn't fool proof but a far cry better than nothing at all.

If we put ourselves to task Mexicans/Canadians wouldn't be able to get within a mile of the place before being snatch off the face of the earth...

I really don't think you have any concept of what our military is capable of when the bleeding hearts aren't in command.

We can put automated motion activated machine guns every couple hundred meters that can knock coke cans out of windows from a mile out, they see in IR, Thermal, Night vison and even UV. 1 guy in a control room can cover mega miles of border. Raccoon and really any non flying anything alive would have an extraordinarily difficult time making it past the security measures we are capable of putting in place.

Welcome to 2015......

And Botany, who in the fuck are we going to pay for it? Cut the largest part of the budget, DEFENSE, to do it?

Technically we wouldn't have to cut shit because it is a defense measure, if we were to do it the GOP would probably just spend more.
 
Last edited:
Even 2000 years ago it worked quite well. It wasn't fool proof but a far cry better than nothing at all.

If we put ourselves to task Mexicans/Canadians wouldn't be able to get within a mile of the place before being snatch off the face of the earth...

I really don't think you have any concept of what our military is capable of when the bleeding hearts aren't in command.

We can put automated motion activated machine guns every couple hundred meters that can knock coke cans out of windows from a mile out, they see in IR, Thermal, Night vison and even UV. 1 guy in a control room can cover mega miles of border. Raccoon and really any non flying anything alive would have an extraordinarily difficult time making it past the security measures we are capable of putting in place.

Welcome to 2015......



Technically we wouldn't have to cut shit because it is a defense measure, if we were to do it the GOP would probably just spend more.
Yeah, someone needs to mow down all those borderland property owners who take a greased palm and turn a blind eye to trespassers.
 
Yeah, someone needs to mow down all those borderland property owners who take a greased palm and turn a blind eye to trespassers.

Oh look the LW eyer is here to pop off with random bleeding heart hysterical bullshit.....:rolleyes:
 
Mebbe the border states could establish a game park right along the border. Charge $50 a head for a licence and another $ 50 for every trophy (Hispanic) shot. Every gun nut in the US would head south, and the revenue gained would prolly reduce state taxes.

Immigration and gun control in one package, with lower taxes - can't be beat - betcha' Texans would vote for it.
 
Yeah, someone needs to mow down all those borderland property owners who take a greased palm and turn a blind eye to trespassers.

Mebbe the border states could establish a game park right along the border. Charge $50 a head for a licence and another $ 50 for every trophy (Hispanic) shot. Every gun nut in the US would head south, and the revenue gained would prolly reduce state taxes.

Immigration and gun control in one package, with lower taxes - can't be beat - betcha' Texans would vote for it.
But if you kill off the landowners, somebody has to take care of their property.
 
Ask Stalin. His wall did well. The system that built it fell before the wall actually did.
 
Back
Top