Abortion Pill [RU-486] risks

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
Deaths After Abortion Pill to Be Studied [RU-486]

[Note: This is not the 'morning after' pill, often discussed]

By GARDINER HARRIS, The New York Times




WASHINGTON (Nov. 23) -- Federal drug regulators have discovered that all four women in this country who died after taking an abortion pill suffered from a rare and highly lethal bacterial infection, a finding that is leading to new scrutiny of the drug's safety.

Since all four deaths occurred in California, an unusual clustering, the Food and Drug Administration quietly tested to see if abortion pills distributed in California were somehow contaminated. They were not.

Stumped, officials from the F.D.A. and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have decided to convene a scientific meeting early next year to discuss this medical mystery, according to two drug agency officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic.

Among other issues, the experts hope to explore whether the abortion pill, called Mifeprex or RU-486, somehow makes patients vulnerable to an infection with Clostridium sordellii, the lethal bacteria. If so, they will explore how such an infection "could be more easily diagnosed and even prevented," one official said.

Monty Patterson, whose daughter Holly died on Sept. 17, 2003, less than a month after her 18th birthday, said he believed that Mifeprex {mifeprostone} inhibits the immune system, making women more vulnerable to bacteria.

Mr. Patterson's campaign against Mifeprex helped persuade the family of at least one other woman who died to have tissue samples tested for the presence of the rare bacteria, he said.



"I believe this drug should be taken off the market," Mr. Patterson said.

For now, there is no indication that the F.D.A. is considering restricting access to the drug. Indeed, it has advised doctors against giving antibiotics as a precaution to prevent the rare infections since antibiotic therapy carries its own risks.

Mifeprex has been used in more than 500,000 medical abortions in the United States since its approval in September 2000. The risks of death from infection after using the pill are similar to the risks after surgical abortion or childbirth, said Dr. Steven Galson, director of the F.D.A.'s center for drugs.

Warnings about the drug's possible link with Clostridium sordellii were placed on Mifeprex's label in July, and the drug agency without announcement updated this information on its Web site on Nov. 4 after it discovered that all of the deaths involved the lethal bacteria.

"I think everyone would like to know what exactly is going on regarding these rare and really serious Clostridium sordellii infections that we have seen happen in California," said Dr. Cynthia Summers, a spokeswoman for Danco Laboratories, maker of Mifeprex. "I don't have an answer for you, and because of that I don't have any running theories."
Information about the Clostridium sordellii infections has emerged slowly because the drug agency largely relies on voluntary reports by doctors, patients and others to identify drug problems and side effects.
Ms. Patterson died seven days after taking Mifeprex. She lived in Livermore, Calif.


On Dec. 29, 2003, Vivian Tran, 22, of Costa Mesa, Calif., died six days after taking Mifeprex.

On Jan. 14, 2004, Chanelle Bryant, 22, of Pasadena, Calif., died six days after taking Mifeprex. And on May 24, 2005, Oriane Shevin, 34, of Los Angeles died five days after taking Mifeprex.

In each case, Clostridium sordellii infected the women's uteruses, flourished and then entered their bloodstreams. The bacterium can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and weakness but may not induce fever, so victims often fail to realize how sick they are until it is too late and succumb to toxic shock. Antibiotics are often ineffective once an infection has flourished because even in death, the bacteria release toxins.

The families of Ms. Patterson, Ms. Tran and Ms. Bryant have all filed suit against Danco, claiming the company failed to warn patients of the drug's dangers.

A woman who died in Canada after taking Mifeprex during clinical testing in 2001 also suffered from a Clostridium sordellii infection. No similar deaths have been reported in Europe, where Mifeprex is widely used. But in the United States, most physicians give Mifeprex and
an[other] accompanying drug, misoprostol {Arthrotec; Cytotec}, in a regimen that involves inserting misoprostol vaginally.

Federal drug regulators have not approved this regimen, but it is not unusual for doctors to use drugs differently from how they are officially approved. Studies indicate that this regimen is effective, requires a lower dose of misoprostol, and allows women to undergo the most emotional and painful part of the procedure at home. What is unknown is whether it may somehow contribute to bacterial infections.



Any hint that Mifeprex may cause problems usually leads to a firestorm of criticism directed at the F.D.A., and the meeting scheduled for next year is bound to incite controversy. A 1996 federal advisory committee that recommended the drug's approval met under intense security in a windowless building surrounded by federal marshals.

Wendy Wright, executive vice president of Concerned Women for America, a conservative group, said that the latest news about deaths involving Mifeprex proved that the drug was unsafe. Ms. Wright also speculated that more women were dying after using the drug but that their deaths were going unreported.

"I'm pleased that the F.D.A. is taking a serious look at this," she said, "and hope that they will no longer allow this drug to be available to cause the deaths of more women."

Dr. Scott J. Spear, chairman of the national medical committee of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the nation's largest provider of abortions, said there was no evidence that the vaginal administration of misoprostol increased the risks of bacterial infections.

"They're all in California, so is this a local issue?" Dr. Spear said. "I think it's dangerous to speculate in the absence of good data."
Mifeprex is sold through physicians, who dispense the drug directly to patients. Physicians are required to give their patients a medication guide that lists the drug's risks.

11/23/05
Copyright © 2005 The New York Times Company.

======
For more direct info:

FDA website

http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/mifepristone/default.htm


manufacturers website
http://www.earlyoptionpill.com/pdfs/dancopress1.pdf
 
Last edited:
If they're inserting another drug (misoprostol) into the vagina, which is not an approved use by the FDA, why is the focus on Mifeprex? If no one in Europe is dying from Mifeprex, wouldn't you logically look at what US doctors are doing here that's different from what they're doing in Europe?

And where does that deadly bacteria come from in the first place??? Is it flying around in the air in California hospitals?

And, seriously, they give women pills to induce abortion, stick other drugs in their vaginas, and then send them home without a course of anitbiotics?? My dentist treats me better than that, and I'm not about to (painfully) expel blood and tissue from my womb when he fills a tooth.
 
That's interesting, Pure. The only argument I have heard about the pill lately is this:

http://www.newstarget.com/011930.html Posted Sep 27, 2005 PT

FDA stalling of OTC morning after pill causes women's health chief to resign

The Food and Drug Administration's Assistant Commissioner, Susan Wood, who is in charge of women's health for the regulatory body, resigned Wednesday, Aug. 31 in protest of the agency indefinitely postponing the decision to allow over-the-counter sales of emergency contraception; a move that has sparked a congressional hearing into the FDA's motivations.

"There's fairly widespread concern about FDA's credibility" among agency veterans as a result, Wood told The Associated Press hours after submitting her resignation Wednesday.
"I have spent the last 15 years working to ensure that science informs good health-policy decisions," Wood, director of FDA's Office of Women's Health, wrote in an e-mail about her departure to agency colleagues.
"I can no longer serve as staff when scientific and clinical evidence, fully evaluated and recommended by the professional staff here, has been overruled."
"It is time for the FDA to stop playing games with the health and well-being of millions of American women," said a statement by Sens.
FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford is out of town, but the agency issued a statement Wednesday saying Wood had helped make "significant strides" in advancing women's health and that "her decision to leave is unfortunate as we work toward solving the complex policy and regulatory issues related to Plan B."
The morning-after pill is a high dose of regular birth control that, taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, can lower the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent.
Instead, Crawford announced Friday that while over-the-counter sales to women 17 and older would be safe, younger teens would still need a prescription because of concern about whether they could use the drug properly --- and that the agency didn't how know how to enforce an age limit.
FDA scientists have publicly called the pill safe, used by millions of women with few side effects, and in December 2003 the agency's scientific advisers overwhelmingly backed over-the-counter sales for all ages.
When FDA first raised the teen concern last year, maker Barr Pharmaceuticals proposed the age limit, saying it could be enforced just like drugstores enforce age limits on cigarette sales.


and this one -

http://www.house.gov/maloney/press/109th/20050125PlanB.htm

January 25, 2005

FDA Violating Law by Stalling on Morning-After Pill, Says “Sound Science” Amendment Author
FDA still has not granted over-the-counter status for Plan B ®



And for an alternate viewpoint, there's this one -

http://www.care-net.org/news/pr/pr14.pdf#search='supports%20FDA%20morning%20after%20pill'

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 7, 2004
CONTACT: Kristin Hansen, (703) 478-5661 x31
CARE NET APPLAUDS FDA DECISION ON
‘MORNING-AFTER PILL’
“The FDA is right not to sacrifice the next generation of young people on the altar of reckless medical and social experimentation,” Entsminger said.
STERLING, VA – Care Net President Kurt Entsminger applauded the decision by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Thursday to reject over-the-counter sales of the “morning-after pill” due to concern over teenagers’ health. “We are grateful that the FDA was able to see the forest for the trees in this highly-politicized issue involving women’s health,” Entsminger said.




I think it's very convenient. Now they can point to these deaths (which may or may not be caused by the drugs) as a reason for continued delaying of approval.

Perhaps I'm biased, as I live in a state that has been damaged by religious viewpoints over scientific ones, but this truly bothers me.
 
Yes, sweetsubsarah, these preliminary findings will undoubtedly be 'used' by certain groups. I just thought the data would be of interest, as it might have been to "Holly."

The drug dangers, it might be mentioned, are in a different category, than for 'morning after' pills. For, in that case, many women have taken 'morning after' pills (in lower doses) as 'birth control pills' so there are many pieces of data about effects of estrogen, etc.

ADDED: In other words, the safety and effectiveness of the "morning after pills" are beyond doubt, and only politics can account for FDA stalling.

Thanks sweetsubsarah
 
Last edited:
LadyJeanne said:
If they're inserting another drug (misoprostol) into the vagina, which is not an approved use by the FDA, why is the focus on Mifeprex? If no one in Europe is dying from Mifeprex, wouldn't you logically look at what US doctors are doing here that's different from what they're doing in Europe?

And where does that deadly bacteria come from in the first place??? Is it flying around in the air in California hospitals?

And, seriously, they give women pills to induce abortion, stick other drugs in their vaginas, and then send them home without a course of anitbiotics?? My dentist treats me better than that, and I'm not about to (painfully) expel blood and tissue from my womb when he fills a tooth.

I have to wonder about that too. They have found no contaminated Mifeprex, but what about the Misoprostol that was used with it. If deaths only occur when the Mis. is used, then why not look at it? Was it contaminated? If it was inserted vaginally, and is contaminated, the bacteria could easily migrate to the uterus. Since the FDA is usually very cautious, I can't help but think they did investigate that, but why was it not mentioned? Maybe the writer of the article is opposed to abortion and is trying to put on a spin.
 
For clarity

Mifeprex is the brandname for mifepristone. It is also called RU-486

Arthrotec and Cytotec are brandnames for misoprostol.

Mifeprex has been used alone to induce abortion up to 49 days LMP, which is, iow, up to about a month after intercourse (and clearly after conception and implantation).

In the US, Mifeprex is often used WITH misoprostol for this abortion effect, the latter being inserted vaginally.

(The 'morning after' pill is actually one {actually 4} of the ordinary birth control pills, in high dosage, and works up to 72 hours after intercourse. IOW there may or may not have been conception.)
 
Last edited:
I too am interested in this. Not from an abortion, pro or con, viewpoint but because of the medical grounds upon which this is based.

Where is the Bacterium coming from? How is it being introduced into the Uterus? Why?

Cat
 
Seriously, I think it's great that the FDA is on this like ducks on a bug, after only four deaths. As opposed to the thousands of deaths connected with drugs the FDA helped rush to market to treat arthritis, obesity and other less controversial conditions than a broken condom, a forgotten pill, or rape.

This could help take our minds off the revelation by an FDA whistle-blower that it withheld positive research on the morning-after pill until after the election, at the behest of the Bush administration.

Gotta have more babies to support a service economy, or the troops, or something. Let's all get to it!
 
seacat,
maybe it's lurking about, but gets spread or encouraged by the procedure.

"Clostridium sordelli is a very common soil and enteric bacterium
that is presented in a very small number of obstetrican and gynecologic cases," after childbirth and some other procedures.

from the Danco website
----

some numbers regarding shereads' point
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904509.html

The risk of death associated with abortion increases with the length of pregnancy, from one death for every 500,000 abortions at 8 or fewer weeks to one per 27,000 at 16–20 weeks and 1 per 8,000 at 21 or more weeks.

The risk of death associated with childbirth is about ten times as high as that associated with abortion.


----
In the US, the risk of pregnancy-related death is about 6 per 100,000 for white women, 10 per 100,000 for Hispanic women, and 25 for (nonHispanic) Black women.

http://pregnancy.about.com/library/blhispanicfacts.htm
 
Last edited:
Better drug news:

A vaccination that prevented cervical cancer in 100% of test subjects. Fairly amazing news, especially for those of you with young daughters who will be able to receive the vaccine at the optimum time.

Pretty amazing news, actually. Thanksgiving-worthy.

Have a happy one, Pure and company.

[/threadjack]

Edited to add: Oops. Make that 94% after 4 years, not 100%. But still.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/02/health/main652837.shtml
 
Last edited:
Pure said:
seacat,

In the US, the risk of pregnancy-related death is about 6 per 100,000 for white women, 10 per 100,000 for Hispanic women, and 25 for (nonHispanic) Black women.

Not counting murder by the baby's father, which remains a leading cause of death among pregnant women.

For a society that allegededly loves children and worships the concept of family, we're awfully ambivalent about the process of making babies, aren't we?
 
Interesting,

I just did some research, and while I don't have my toxobiology books at hand I can say this. C. Sordii is a common bacterium. It has been known to invade/invest itself in wound sites on all parts of the body.

From what I have been able to discover/read the only way it could have been introduced into the host body, ie. the women in this article, was during the vaginal introduction of the secondary medication. (Misoprostol) if this is the case then the use of RU-486 is only secondary to the infection. It is the introduction of the bacterium which is the problem. To whit the deaths are not caused by the use of RU-486 but the use of the secondary drug and the way it is introduced into the body. (Has anyone here ever heard of Sterile Field Technique?)

Let me put this in laymans terms. A woman goes in to get a treatment of RU-486. She is given the pill, and told to lay on the table. The doc steps between her spread legs and jams his fingers up her twat pushing a lozenge of the secondary med deep inside of her. Somehwere along the line either his gloves or the lozenge has come into contact with something contaminated with C.Sordii.
It isn't the RU_486 at fault, it is the doc or tech giving her the secondary meds.

Cat
 
I'll bet the anti-abortionists will love that story... Wouldn't it be interesting to compare the mortality rate of Mifeprex with that of other drugs, and see how the media cover them?

I know, I know - I'm getting horribly cynical with age ;)
 
Probably youre aware of this, shereads, but the HPV vaccine ["cervical cancer vaccine"] is already a subject of controversy.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/10/31/MNG2LFGJFT1.DTL

For one approach would be to vaccinate all girls when they reach, say 12 years old (or perhaps vaccinate everyone reaching that age).

This issue has been raised in another thread, by LadyJeanne and others

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=384249&highlight=cervical+cancer

I know some religious folks opposed anesthetics. You know 'pain' is part of God's plan, don't ya?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top