Abortion of marginable children is a social good.....

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Big-Government/2014/Social-and-Family/african-americans-abortion-billboard-AFP.jpgArchitect Jonathan Gruber: Abortion of 'Marginal Children' a 'Social Good'







Embattled MIT professor Jonathan Gruber has not only gotten in trouble for bragging about helping President Obama put one over on the American people with Obamacare, he’s also been uncovered as an abortion advocate—but not a run-of-the-mill advocate of “women’s rights.”

No, Gruber’s abortion advocacy is of a particularly pungent eugenics variety. He’s on record repeatedly making the case from social science that abortion is a “social good” because it reduces the number of “marginal children,” by which he means urban poor—those he says can be counted on to commit crimes if they were ever born.

Gruber co-authored a paper during the Clinton years which argued that legal abortion had saved the U.S. taxpayer upwards of $14 billion in welfare benefits and that it also lowered crime.

Gruber’s work heavily influenced other researchers, including a paper called The Impact of Legalized Abortion by Steven Levitt of the University of Chicago, whose later book Freakonomics and whose ongoing work makes the strongest case that abortion legalizations in the 1970s caused a dramatic drop in crime twenty years later.

Pro-lifers have always wondered why the black community has not responded more aggressively to the fact that so many abortion clinics are located in poor neighborhoods and why the black abortion rate is so much higher than whites.

A documentary called Maafa 21 argues that abortion is a part of what they called a “black genocide.”

African-American marketing expert Ryan Scott Bomberger founded an organization called The Radiance Foundation that makes commercials for the unborn child with a special emphasis on the high incidence of black abortion. Emmy-wining Bomberger’s toomanyaborted.com campaign looks specifically at black abortion. One meme calls abortion a “civil wrong” and that blacks are “still not free at last” because of abortion. Bomberger is being sued by the NAACP for calling the group “pro-abortion.”

A group called 41 Percent tracks all abortions in New York City, which has an abortion rate at twice the national average, points out that the abortion rate in the largely black borough of The Bronx is an astounding 47%.

These are the types of communities Gruber meant when he referred the “marginal children” who were the most likely to end up on welfare and committing crimes if they were allowed to be born.
 
when That billboard was put up in NYC

It was called RACIST!

Shameful!
 
can we have an honest discussion about BABY KILLING?

and what it really is!?
 
"They" only need #thosepeople until they can import some lighter tan variants to supplant them as voters.

Given the enmity between the two groups in actual gangland, it is surprising that the Democrats can herd both groups of cats into the same bag and tell both that their policies are improving their lives.
 
Or we could be conservatives, not give women a choice and have fuck tons of un wanted kids flooding the already strained foster/prison system and bitch about what a pain in the ass that is.

Cuz that's smart!!

:rolleyes:

Any of you conservative types want to step forward and tell us how we should have a few million unwanted bastards running around each year and that it would be a good thing???

ANYONE????:confused:
 
Last edited:
Or we could be conservatives, not give women a choice and have fuck tons of un wanted kids flooding the already strained foster/prison system and bitch about what a pain in the ass that is.

Cuz that's smart!!

:rolleyes:

Well at least that's honest. Execute them before they can become criminals for the win.
 
It's been done.


http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/



Abortion and crime: who should you believe?


1) Five states legalized abortion three years before Roe v. Wade. Crime started falling three years earlier in these states, with property crime (done by younger people) falling before violent crime.
2) After abortion was legalized, the availability of abortions differed dramatically across states. In some states like North Dakota and in parts of the deep South, it was virtually impossible to get an abortion even after Roe v. Wade. If one compares states that had high abortion rates in the mid 1970s to states that had low abortion rates in the mid 1970s, you see the following patterns with crime. For the period from 1973-1988, the two sets of states (high abortion states and low abortion states) have nearly identical crime patterns. Note, that this is a period before the generations exposed to legalized abortion are old enough to do much crime. So this is exactly what the Donohue-Levitt theory predicts. But from the period 1985-1997, when the post Roe cohort is reaching peak crime ages, the high abortion states see a decline in crime of 30% relative to the low abortion states. Our original data ended in 1997. If one updated the study, the results would be similar.)
3) All of the decline in crime from 1985-1997 experienced by high abortion states relative to low abortion states is concentrated among the age groups born after Roe v. Wade. For people born before abortion legalization, there is no difference in the crime patterns for high abortion and low abortion states, just as the Donohue-Levitt theory predicts.
4) When we compare arrest rates of people born in the same state, just before and just after abortion legalization, we once again see the identical pattern of lower arrest rates for those born after legalization than before.
5) The evidence from Canada, Australia, and Romania also support the hypothesis that abortion reduces crime.
6) Studies have shown a reduction in infanticide, teen age drug use, and teen age childbearing consistent with the theory that abortion will reduce other social ills similar to crime.
These six points all support the hypothesis. There is one fact that, without more careful analysis, argues against the Donohue-Levitt story:
7) The homicide rate of young males (especially young Black males) temporarily skyrocketed in the late 1980s, especially in urban centers like Los Angeles, New York City, and Washington, DC, before returning to regular levels soon thereafter. These young males who were hitting their peak crime years were born right around the time abortion was legalized.
. . . and so on.
 
Well at least that's honest. Execute them before they can become criminals for the win.

14 billion and a reduction in crime ain't no joke man......only retards like Sanity Sam want to raise crime and spend more.

Execute? Jesus titty fuckin' christ...LOL

so you agree with Gruber?

Not entirely, but I don't think giving folks the option to save the nation 14 billion and reducing the crime rates is a negative thing.
 
14 billion and a reduction in crime ain't no joke man......only retards like Sanity Sam want to raise crime and spend more.

Execute? Jesus titty fuckin' christ...LOL



Not entirely, but I don't think giving folks the option to save the nation 14 billion and reducing the crime rates is a negative thing.

dummy....I wanna KILL EM ALL:D
 
It's been done.


http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/



Abortion and crime: who should you believe?


. . . and so on.

Yes, but no one believes the statistics about crime and the alleged war on poverty that spawned the single parent "new normal."

The war on poverty spawned (literally) the shocking levels of violence, and abortion partially solved the problem that government created.

Margaret Sanger was ahead of her time. Society needs less of #thosepeople is the theory.

How about encouraging #those people to have healthy families and quit incentivising the temporary nature of relationships in our modern, enlightened world?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top