Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another empty thread from Sanity "family values" Sam.
Or we could be conservatives, not give women a choice and have fuck tons of un wanted kids flooding the already strained foster/prison system and bitch about what a pain in the ass that is.
Cuz that's smart!!
![]()
so you agree with Gruber?
That was for Bootay Boi
. . . and so on.1) Five states legalized abortion three years before Roe v. Wade. Crime started falling three years earlier in these states, with property crime (done by younger people) falling before violent crime.
2) After abortion was legalized, the availability of abortions differed dramatically across states. In some states like North Dakota and in parts of the deep South, it was virtually impossible to get an abortion even after Roe v. Wade. If one compares states that had high abortion rates in the mid 1970s to states that had low abortion rates in the mid 1970s, you see the following patterns with crime. For the period from 1973-1988, the two sets of states (high abortion states and low abortion states) have nearly identical crime patterns. Note, that this is a period before the generations exposed to legalized abortion are old enough to do much crime. So this is exactly what the Donohue-Levitt theory predicts. But from the period 1985-1997, when the post Roe cohort is reaching peak crime ages, the high abortion states see a decline in crime of 30% relative to the low abortion states. Our original data ended in 1997. If one updated the study, the results would be similar.)
3) All of the decline in crime from 1985-1997 experienced by high abortion states relative to low abortion states is concentrated among the age groups born after Roe v. Wade. For people born before abortion legalization, there is no difference in the crime patterns for high abortion and low abortion states, just as the Donohue-Levitt theory predicts.
4) When we compare arrest rates of people born in the same state, just before and just after abortion legalization, we once again see the identical pattern of lower arrest rates for those born after legalization than before.
5) The evidence from Canada, Australia, and Romania also support the hypothesis that abortion reduces crime.
6) Studies have shown a reduction in infanticide, teen age drug use, and teen age childbearing consistent with the theory that abortion will reduce other social ills similar to crime.
These six points all support the hypothesis. There is one fact that, without more careful analysis, argues against the Donohue-Levitt story:
7) The homicide rate of young males (especially young Black males) temporarily skyrocketed in the late 1980s, especially in urban centers like Los Angeles, New York City, and Washington, DC, before returning to regular levels soon thereafter. These young males who were hitting their peak crime years were born right around the time abortion was legalized.
It's been done.
http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/
Abortion and crime: who should you believe?
. . . and so on.
actually, that is what Gruber was saying
Kill em, before they kill
sorta like that crazy poster, BUSYBODY
but when BUSYBODY says that.....and about MOOSEFUCKS as well, he is EVIL and a hater
When a PhD fro MIT says it
GENIUES![]()
Well at least that's honest. Execute them before they can become criminals for the win.
so you agree with Gruber?
14 billion and a reduction in crime ain't no joke man......only retards like Sanity Sam want to raise crime and spend more.
Execute? Jesus titty fuckin' christ...LOL
Not entirely, but I don't think giving folks the option to save the nation 14 billion and reducing the crime rates is a negative thing.
dummy....I wanna KILL EM ALL![]()
yeah, I know
they are professional frowners![]()
It's been done.
http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/
Abortion and crime: who should you believe?
. . . and so on.